SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks on Danish mink farms and mitigating public health interventions.
Journal
European journal of public health
ISSN: 1464-360X
Titre abrégé: Eur J Public Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9204966
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 02 2022
01 02 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
9
10
2021
medline:
5
2
2022
entrez:
8
10
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
First severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections on Danish mink farms were reported in June 2020 and thereupon spread geographically. We provide population-level evidence on excess human incidence rates in Danish municipalities affected by disease outbreaks on mink farms and evaluate the effectiveness of two non-pharmaceutical interventions, i.e. culling of infected mink and local lockdowns. We use information on SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks on mink farms in 94 Danish municipalities together with data on human SARS-CoV-2 cases and tested persons in Weeks 24-51 of 2020. Difference-in-difference estimation and panel event studies for weekly human incidence rates are applied to (i) identify epidemiological trends of human SARS-CoV-2 infections associated with disease outbreaks on mink farms, and (ii) quantify the mitigating effects from the two non-pharmaceutical interventions. SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks on mink farms in a municipality associate with an increase in weekly human incidence rates by about 75%; spatial spillover effects to neighbouring municipalities are also observed. Local lockdowns reduce human incidence rates, while culling of mink appears to be more effective in combination with a lockdown. The temporal lag between an outbreak on a mink farm and a significant increase in human incidence rates is estimated to be 1-3 weeks; lockdowns and culling of mink neutralize this effect 4-8 weeks after the initial outbreak. SARS-CoV-2 infections among farmed mink in Denmark significantly link to local human infection trends. Strict animal and human disease surveillance in regions with mink farming should be pursued internationally to mitigate future epidemic developments.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
First severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections on Danish mink farms were reported in June 2020 and thereupon spread geographically. We provide population-level evidence on excess human incidence rates in Danish municipalities affected by disease outbreaks on mink farms and evaluate the effectiveness of two non-pharmaceutical interventions, i.e. culling of infected mink and local lockdowns.
METHODS
We use information on SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks on mink farms in 94 Danish municipalities together with data on human SARS-CoV-2 cases and tested persons in Weeks 24-51 of 2020. Difference-in-difference estimation and panel event studies for weekly human incidence rates are applied to (i) identify epidemiological trends of human SARS-CoV-2 infections associated with disease outbreaks on mink farms, and (ii) quantify the mitigating effects from the two non-pharmaceutical interventions.
RESULTS
SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks on mink farms in a municipality associate with an increase in weekly human incidence rates by about 75%; spatial spillover effects to neighbouring municipalities are also observed. Local lockdowns reduce human incidence rates, while culling of mink appears to be more effective in combination with a lockdown. The temporal lag between an outbreak on a mink farm and a significant increase in human incidence rates is estimated to be 1-3 weeks; lockdowns and culling of mink neutralize this effect 4-8 weeks after the initial outbreak.
CONCLUSIONS
SARS-CoV-2 infections among farmed mink in Denmark significantly link to local human infection trends. Strict animal and human disease surveillance in regions with mink farming should be pursued internationally to mitigate future epidemic developments.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34623404
pii: 6384575
doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckab182
pmc: PMC8549281
doi:
Banques de données
figshare
['10.6084/m9.figshare.14039666']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
151-157Subventions
Organisme : Open-Access-Fund of the Helmut-Schmidt-University/ University of the Federal Armed Forces Hamburg
Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association.
Références
Science. 2021 Jan 8;371(6525):172-177
pubmed: 33172935
Science. 2003 Jun 20;300(5627):1961-6
pubmed: 12766206
Lancet. 2013 Aug 24;382(9893):662-4
pubmed: 23831143
Nat Commun. 2021 Feb 8;12(1):846
pubmed: 33558479
Nature. 2020 Aug;584(7820):257-261
pubmed: 32512579
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Jan;21(1):18-19
pubmed: 33227234
Emerg Infect Dis. 2021 Feb;27(2):547-551
pubmed: 33207152
Euro Surveill. 2021 Feb;26(5):
pubmed: 33541485
Annu Rev Public Health. 2018 Apr 1;39:453-469
pubmed: 29328877
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2020 Sep;103(3):955-959
pubmed: 32700664
J Reg Sci. 2021 Jun 20;:
pubmed: 34230689
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Oct;20(10):1151-1160
pubmed: 32559451
Lancet Public Health. 2020 Nov;5(11):e612-e623
pubmed: 33065023
Euro Surveill. 2020 Jun;25(23):
pubmed: 32553059
Animals (Basel). 2021 Jan 12;11(1):
pubmed: 33445704
J Virol. 2010 Jan;84(1):21-6
pubmed: 19828604
Eur J Public Health. 2020 Dec 11;30(6):1176-1180
pubmed: 32818263