Quality of Life After Bariatric Surgery-a Systematic Review with Bayesian Network Meta-analysis.
Bariatric surgery
Network meta-analysis
Quality of life
Journal
Obesity surgery
ISSN: 1708-0428
Titre abrégé: Obes Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9106714
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 2021
12 2021
Historique:
received:
06
06
2021
accepted:
24
08
2021
revised:
23
08
2021
pubmed:
12
10
2021
medline:
11
3
2022
entrez:
11
10
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Comprehensive analysis and comparison of HRQoL following different bariatric interventions through systematic review with network meta-analysis. Different types of bariatric surgeries have been developed throughout the years. Apart from weight loss and comorbidities remission, improvement of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is an important outcome of metabolic surgery. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Scopus databases have been searched up to April 2020. Inclusion criteria to the analysis were (1) study with at least 2 arms comparing bariatric surgeries; (2) reporting of HRQoL with a validated tool; (3) follow-up period of 1, 2, 3, or 5 years. Network meta-analysis was conducted using Bayesian statistics. The primary outcome was HRQoL. Forty-seven studies were included in the analysis involving 26,629 patients and 11 different surgeries such as sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), gastric bypass (LRYGB), one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB), and other. At 1 year, there was significant difference in HRQoL in favor of LSG, LRYGB, and OAG compared with lifestyle intervention (SMD: 0.44; 95% CrI 0.2 to 0.68 for LSG, SMD: 0.56; 95% CrI 0.31 to 0.8 for LRYGB; and SMD: 0.43; 95% CrI 0.06 to 0.8 for OAGB). At 5 years, LSG, LRYGB, and OAGB showed better HRQoL compared to control (SMD: 0.92; 95% CrI 0.58 to 1.26, SMD: 1.27; 95% CrI 0.94 to 1.61, and SMD: 1.01; 95% CrI 0.63 to 1.4, respectively). LSG and LRYGB may lead to better HRQoL across most follow-up time points. Long-term analysis shows that bariatric intervention results in better HRQoL than non-surgical interventions.
Sections du résumé
OBJECTIVE
Comprehensive analysis and comparison of HRQoL following different bariatric interventions through systematic review with network meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND
Different types of bariatric surgeries have been developed throughout the years. Apart from weight loss and comorbidities remission, improvement of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is an important outcome of metabolic surgery.
METHODS
MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Scopus databases have been searched up to April 2020. Inclusion criteria to the analysis were (1) study with at least 2 arms comparing bariatric surgeries; (2) reporting of HRQoL with a validated tool; (3) follow-up period of 1, 2, 3, or 5 years. Network meta-analysis was conducted using Bayesian statistics. The primary outcome was HRQoL.
RESULTS
Forty-seven studies were included in the analysis involving 26,629 patients and 11 different surgeries such as sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), gastric bypass (LRYGB), one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB), and other. At 1 year, there was significant difference in HRQoL in favor of LSG, LRYGB, and OAG compared with lifestyle intervention (SMD: 0.44; 95% CrI 0.2 to 0.68 for LSG, SMD: 0.56; 95% CrI 0.31 to 0.8 for LRYGB; and SMD: 0.43; 95% CrI 0.06 to 0.8 for OAGB). At 5 years, LSG, LRYGB, and OAGB showed better HRQoL compared to control (SMD: 0.92; 95% CrI 0.58 to 1.26, SMD: 1.27; 95% CrI 0.94 to 1.61, and SMD: 1.01; 95% CrI 0.63 to 1.4, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS
LSG and LRYGB may lead to better HRQoL across most follow-up time points. Long-term analysis shows that bariatric intervention results in better HRQoL than non-surgical interventions.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34633614
doi: 10.1007/s11695-021-05687-1
pii: 10.1007/s11695-021-05687-1
pmc: PMC8595157
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
5213-5223Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
Rajan TM, Menon V. Psychiatric disorders and obesity: a review of association studies. J Postgrad Med. 2017;63(3):182–90.
pubmed: 28695871
pmcid: 5525483
Fiorani C, et al. Long-term quality of life outcomes after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass-a comparative study. Obes Surg. 2020.
Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30(6):473–83.
pubmed: 1593914
pmcid: 1593914
Moorehead MK, et al. The validation of the Moorehead-Ardelt Quality of Life Questionnaire II. Obes Surg. 2003;13(5):684–92.
pubmed: 14627461
Eypasch E, et al. Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index: development, validation and application of a new instrument. Br J Surg. 1995;82(2):216–22.
pubmed: 7749697
Kolotkin RL, et al. Assessing Impact of Weight on Quality of Life. Obes Res. 1995;3(1):49–56.
pubmed: 7712359
Hutton B, et al. The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanations. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162(11):777–84.
pubmed: 26030634
Weiner S, et al. The Bariatric Quality of Life index: a measure of well-being in obesity surgery patients. Obes Surg. 2005;15(4):538–45.
pubmed: 15954234
Therrien F, et al. The Laval Questionnaire: a new instrument to measure quality of life in morbid obesity. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2011;9:66.
pubmed: 21843326
pmcid: 3168398
Velanovich V. The development of the GERD-HRQL symptom severity instrument. Dis Esophagus. 2007;20(2):130–4.
The WHOQOL Group. Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment. Psychol Med. 1998;28(3):551–8.
Yiengprugsawan V, Kelly M, Tawatsupa B. SF-8TM Health Survey. In: Michalos AC, editor. Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research. Dordrecht: Springer, Netherlands; 2014. p. 5940–2.
Oria HE, Moorehead MK. Bariatric analysis and reporting outcome system (BAROS). Obes Surg. 1998;8(5):487–99.
pubmed: 9819079
Niero M, et al. A new approach to multicultural item generation in the development of two obesity-specific measures: the Obesity and Weight Loss Quality of Life (OWLQOL) questionnaire and the Weight-Related Symptom Measure (WRSM). Clin Ther. 2002;24(4):690–700.
pubmed: 12017412
Fu R, et al. Handling continuous outcomes in quantitative synthesis. In Methods guide for effectiveness and comparative effectiveness reviews. AHRQ Publication: Oregon; 2013.
Wells G, Shea B, O’Connell J. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing The Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-analyses. Ottawa Health Research Institute Web site; 2014. 7.
Higgins JP, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343:d5928.
pubmed: 22008217
pmcid: 22008217
Dias S, et al. Network meta-analysis for decision making. 2018.
Thorlund K, et al. Pooling health-related quality of life outcomes in meta-analysis-a tutorial and review of methods for enhancing interpretability. Res Synth Methods. 2011;2(3):188–203.
pubmed: 26061786
Shi HY, et al. Responsiveness and minimal clinically important differences after cholecystectomy: GIQLI versus SF-36. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008;12(7):1275–82.
pubmed: 18454301
Lee WJ, et al. Laparoscopic vertical banded gastroplasty and laparoscopic gastric bypass: a comparison. Obes Surg. 2004;14(5):626–34.
pubmed: 15186629
Lee W-J, et al. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y versus mini-gastric bypass for the treatment of morbid obesity: a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. Ann Surg. 2005;242(1):20–8.
pubmed: 15973097
pmcid: 1357700
Muller M, et al. Quality of life after bariatric surgery-a comparative study of laparoscopic banding vs. bypass. Obes Surg. 2008;18(12):1551–7.
pubmed: 18461420
Campos GM, et al. Better weight loss, resolution of diabetes, and quality of life for laparoscopic gastric bypass vs banding: results of a 2-cohort pair-matched study. Arch Surg (Chicago, Ill: 1960). 2011;146(2):149–55.
Svanevik M, et al. Patient-reported outcome measures 2 years after standard and distal gastric bypass—a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Obes Surg. 2018;28(3):606–14.
pubmed: 28865057
Alley JB, et al. Quality of life after sleeve gastrectomy and adjustable gastric banding. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012;8(1):31–40.
pubmed: 21620778
Lee WJ, et al. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y vs. mini-gastric bypass for the treatment of morbid obesity: a 10-year experience. Obes Surg. 2012;22(12):1827–34.
pubmed: 23011462
Carlin AM, et al. The comparative effectiveness of sleeve gastrectomy, gastric bypass, and adjustable gastric banding procedures for the treatment of morbid obesity. Ann Surg. 2013;257(5):791–7.
pubmed: 23470577
Karlsen TI, et al. Health related quality of life after gastric bypass or intensive lifestyle intervention: a controlled clinical study. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013; 11(1).
O’Brien PE, et al. Intensive medical weight loss or laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding in the treatment of mild to moderate obesity: long-term follow-up of a prospective randomised trial. Obes Surg. 2013;23(9):1345–53.
pubmed: 23760764
Kaseja K, Majewski WD, Kolpiewicz B. A comparison of efectiveness, and an assessment of the quality of life of patients after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Ann Acad Med Stetin. 2014;60(2):7–12.
pubmed: 26591099
Duarte MIXDT, et al. Impact on quality of life, weight loss and comorbidities: a study comparing the biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch and the banded Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Arq Gastroenterol. 2014;51(4):320–7.
pubmed: 25591161
Strain GW, et al. The effects of weight loss after bariatric surgery on health-related quality of life and depression. Nutr Diabetes. 2014;4:e132.
pubmed: 25177912
pmcid: 4183970
Schauer P, et al. Bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy for diabetes - 3-year outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(21):2002–13.
pubmed: 24679060
pmcid: 5451259
Bhandari M, et al. Comparison between banded and nonbanded Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with 2-year follow-up: a preliminary retrospective analysis. Obes Surg. 2016;26(1):213–8.
pubmed: 26482162
Major P, et al. Quality of life after bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2015;25(9):1703–10.
pubmed: 25676156
pmcid: 4522031
Lee WJ, et al. Medium-term results of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a matched comparison with gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2015;25(8):1431–8.
pubmed: 25648253
Barr AC, et al. GERD and acid reduction medication use following gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Endosc. 2017;31(1):410–5.
pubmed: 27287901
Bužgová R, et al. Evaluation of quality of life, clinical parameters, and psychological distress after bariatric surgery: comparison of the laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and laparoscopic greater curvature plication. Bariatr Surg Pract Patient Care. 2016;11(4):169–76.
Figura A, et al. Improvement in self-reported eating-related psychopathology and physical health-related quality of life after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a pre-post analysis and comparison with conservatively treated patients with obesity. Eat Behav. 2017;24:17–25.
pubmed: 27951428
Risstad H, et al. Standard vs distal Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in patients with body mass index 50 to 60: a double-blind, randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg. 2016;151(12):1146–55.
pubmed: 27626242
Ignat M, et al. Randomized trial of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy in achieving excess weight loss. Br J Surg. 2017;104(3):248–56.
pubmed: 27901287
Janik MR, et al. Quality of life and bariatric surgery: cross-sectional study and analysis of factors influencing outcome. Obes Surg. 2016;26(12):2849–55.
pubmed: 27179520
pmcid: 5118395
Nickel F, et al. Gastrointestinal quality of life improves significantly after sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass-a prospective cross-sectional study within a 2-year follow-up. Obes Surg. 2017;27(5):1292–7.
pubmed: 27878423
Omotosho P, et al. Gastric bypass significantly improves quality of life in morbidly obese patients with type 2 diabetes. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(7):2857–64.
pubmed: 26823053
pmcid: 4912933
Panosian J, et al. Physical activity in obese type 2 diabetes after gastric bypass or medical management. Am J Med. 2017;130(1):83–92.
pubmed: 27555097
Accardi R, et al. Different quality of life outcomes between Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding. Bariatr Surg Pract Patient Care. 2017;12(1):29–34.
Elrefai M, et al. Quality of life after bariatric surgery: comparison of four different surgical procedures. Bariatr Surg Pract Patient Care. 2017;12(2):61–6.
Biter LU, et al. Quality of life 1 year after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a randomized controlled trial focusing on gastroesophageal reflux disease. Obes Surg. 2017;27(10):2557–65.
pubmed: 28474319
Peterli R, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus Roux-Y-gastric bypass for morbid obesity-3-year outcomes of the prospective randomized Swiss Multicenter Bypass Or Sleeve Study (SM-BOSS). Ann Surg. 2017;265(3):466–73.
pubmed: 28170356
Svanevik M, et al. Patient-reported outcome measures 2 years after standard and distal gastric bypass-a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Obes Surg. 2018;28(3):606–14.
pubmed: 28865057
Versteegden DPA, Van Himbeeck MJJ, Nienhuijs SW. Improvement in quality of life after bariatric surgery: sleeve versus bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;14(2):170–4.
pubmed: 29150392
Schauer PR, et al. Bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy for diabetes - 5-year outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(7):641–51.
pubmed: 28199805
pmcid: 5451258
Salminen P, et al. Effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy vs laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass on weight loss at 5 years among patients with morbid obesity: the SLEEVEPASS randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2018;319(3):241–54.
pubmed: 5833550
pmcid: 5833550
Homan J, et al. A longer biliopancreatic limb in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass improves weight loss in the first years after surgery: results of a randomized controlled trial. Obes Surg. 2018;28(12):3744–55.
pubmed: 30073496
Peterli R, et al. Effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy vs laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass on weight loss in patients with morbid obesity: the SM-BOSS Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2018;319(3):255–65.
pubmed: 5833546
pmcid: 5833546
Elias K, et al. Changes in bowel habits and patient-scored symptoms after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;14(2):144–9.
pubmed: 29108895
Silva JN, et al. How is bariatric surgery improving the quality of life of obese patients: a Portuguese cross-sectional study. Acta Med Port. 2018;31(7–8):391–8.
pubmed: 30189167
Catheline JM, et al. Prospective, multicentric, comparative study between sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, 277 patients, 3 years follow-up. J Visc Surg. 2019;156(6):497–506.
pubmed: 31103560
Nabil TM, et al. Conventional versus distal laparoscopic one-anastomosis gastric bypass: a randomized controlled trial with 1-year follow-up. Obes Surg. 2019;29(10):3103–10.
pubmed: 31177364
Skogar ML, Sundbom M. Early complications, long-term adverse events, and quality of life after duodenal switch and gastric bypass in a matched national cohort. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2020.
Lechaux D, Le Foll D, Rascle O. Weight loss and quality of life after sleeve gastrectomy or one-anastomosis gastric bypass: results of a prospective study of 120 women with morbid obesity. Obes Surg. 2020.
Monpellier VM, et al. Health-related quality of life after sleeve gastrectomy equal to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass patients? Qual Life Res. 2020.
Poelemeijer YQM, et al. Measuring quality of life in bariatric surgery: a multicentre study. Surg Endosc. 2020.
Park CH, et al. Comparative efficacy of bariatric surgery in the treatment of morbid obesity and diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2019;29(7):2180–90.
Lindekilde N, et al. The impact of bariatric surgery on quality of life: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2015;16(8):639–51.
pubmed: 26094664
Hu Z, et al. A comprehensive comparison of LRYGB and LSG in obese patients including the effects on QoL, comorbidities, weight loss, and complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2020;30(3):819–27.
pubmed: 31834563
Lee Y, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a systematic review and meta-analysis of weight loss, comorbidities, and biochemical outcomes from randomized controlled trials. Ann Surg. 2019.
Campos GM, et al. Better weight loss, resolution of diabetes, and quality of life for laparoscopic gastric bypass vs banding: results of a 2-cohort pair-matched study. Arch Surg. 2011;146(2):149–55.
pubmed: 21339424
Homan J, et al. Treatment of vitamin and mineral deficiencies after biliopancreatic diversion with or without duodenal switch: a major challenge. Obes Surg. 2018;28(1):234–41.
pubmed: 28861696
Shoar S, et al. Banded versus nonbanded Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019;15(5):688–95.
pubmed: 31255232
Boerboom A, et al. A long biliopancreatic and short alimentary limb results in more weight loss in revisional RYGB surgery. Outcomes of the randomized controlled ELEGANCE REDO trial. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019;15(1):60–9.
pubmed: 30471927
Boerboom A, et al. A long biliopancreatic and short alimentary limb results in more weight loss in revisional RYGB surgery. Outcomes of the randomized controlled ELEGANCE REDO trial. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019;15(1):60–9.
pubmed: 30471927
Moon RC, et al. Short-term results of long biliopancreatic limb Roux-en-Y gastric bypass-is it superior? Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2020;16(4):492–6.
pubmed: 31987734
Rutledge R, Kular K, Manchanda N. The mini-gastric bypass original technique. Int J Surg. 2019;61:38–41.
pubmed: 30476553
Poublon N, et al. One anastomosis gastric bypass vs. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, remedy for insufficient weight loss and weight regain after failed restrictive bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2020.
Ramos AC, et al. IFSO (International Federation for Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders) Consensus Conference Statement on One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB-MGB): results of a modified Delphi study. Obes Surg. 2020;30(5):1625–34.
pubmed: 32152841
Robert M, et al. Efficacy and safety of one anastomosis gastric bypass versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for obesity (YOMEGA): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2019;393(10178):1299–309.
pubmed: 30851879
Strain GW, et al. The impact of biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD/DS) over 9 years. Obes Surg. 2017;27(3):787–94.
pubmed: 27686233