Danger in discharge summaries: abbreviations create confusion for both author and recipient.
Australia
communication
general practitioner
inpatient
primary care
Journal
Internal medicine journal
ISSN: 1445-5994
Titre abrégé: Intern Med J
Pays: Australia
ID NLM: 101092952
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2023
04 2023
Historique:
revised:
26
09
2021
received:
08
08
2021
accepted:
06
10
2021
medline:
17
5
2023
pubmed:
13
10
2021
entrez:
12
10
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The transition from hospital inpatient care to medical care in the community is a high-risk period for adverse events. Inadequate communication, including low-quality or unavailable discharge summaries, has been shown to impact patient care. To assess use of abbreviations in clinical handover documents from inpatient hospital teams to general practitioners (GP), and the interpretation of these abbreviations by GP and hospital-based junior doctors. This is a retrospective audit of 802 discharge summaries completed during a 1-week period in 2017 by a Queensland regional health service. GP and local junior doctors then attempted interpretation of 20 relevant abbreviations. A total of 99% (794) discharge summaries included abbreviations. A total of 1612 different abbreviations was used on 16 327 occasions. The median number of abbreviations per discharge summary was 17 (range 0-86). A total of 254 GP and 62 junior doctors responded to a survey, which found that no abbreviation was interpreted the same by all respondents. GP and junior doctors were unable to offer any interpretation in 17.9% and 15.2% of cases respectively. GP offered a greater range of interpretations than junior doctors, with a median of 9 and 3 different interpretations per abbreviation respectively. A total of 94% (239) of GP felt that the use of abbreviations in discharge summaries had the potential to impact patient care. A total of 152 (60%) GP felt that time spent clarifying abbreviations in discharge summaries could be excessive. Abbreviations are often used in discharge summaries, yet poorly understood. This has the potential to impact patient care in the transition period after hospitalisation.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The transition from hospital inpatient care to medical care in the community is a high-risk period for adverse events. Inadequate communication, including low-quality or unavailable discharge summaries, has been shown to impact patient care.
AIMS
To assess use of abbreviations in clinical handover documents from inpatient hospital teams to general practitioners (GP), and the interpretation of these abbreviations by GP and hospital-based junior doctors.
METHODS
This is a retrospective audit of 802 discharge summaries completed during a 1-week period in 2017 by a Queensland regional health service. GP and local junior doctors then attempted interpretation of 20 relevant abbreviations.
RESULTS
A total of 99% (794) discharge summaries included abbreviations. A total of 1612 different abbreviations was used on 16 327 occasions. The median number of abbreviations per discharge summary was 17 (range 0-86). A total of 254 GP and 62 junior doctors responded to a survey, which found that no abbreviation was interpreted the same by all respondents. GP and junior doctors were unable to offer any interpretation in 17.9% and 15.2% of cases respectively. GP offered a greater range of interpretations than junior doctors, with a median of 9 and 3 different interpretations per abbreviation respectively. A total of 94% (239) of GP felt that the use of abbreviations in discharge summaries had the potential to impact patient care. A total of 152 (60%) GP felt that time spent clarifying abbreviations in discharge summaries could be excessive.
CONCLUSIONS
Abbreviations are often used in discharge summaries, yet poorly understood. This has the potential to impact patient care in the transition period after hospitalisation.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
550-558Informations de copyright
© 2021 Royal Australasian College of Physicians.
Références
Forster AJ, Murff HJ, Peterson JF, Gandhi TK, Bates DW. The incidence and severity of adverse events affecting patients after discharge from the hospital. Ann Intern Med 2003; 138: 161-7.
Forster AJ, Clark HD, Menard A, Dupuis N, Chernish R, Chandok N et al. Adverse events among medical patients after discharge from hospital [published correction appears in CMAJ. 2004 Mar 2;170(5):771]. Can Med Assoc J 2004; 170: 345-9.
Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care. National Guidelines for On-Screen Presentation of Discharge Summaries. Sydney: Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care; 2018 [cited 2018 May]. Available from URL: https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/National-guidelines-for-on-screen-presentation-of-discharge-summaries-Feb-2018.pdf
Kripalani S, LeFevre F, Phillips CO, Williams MV, Basaviah P, Baker DW. Deficits in communication and information transfer between hospital-based and primary care physicians: implications for patient safety and continuity of care. JAMA 2007; 297: 831-41.
Unnewehr M, Schaaf B, Marev R, Fitch J, Friederichs H. Optimizing the quality of hospital discharge summaries - a systematic review and practical tools. Postgrad Med 2015; 127: 630-9.
Moore C, Wisnivesky J, Williams S, McGinn T. Medical errors related to discontinuity of care from an inpatient to an outpatient setting. J Gen Intern Med 2003; 18: 646-51.
van Walraven C, Seth R, Austin PC, Laupacis A. Effect of discharge summary availability during post-discharge visits on hospital readmission. J Gen Intern Med 2002; 17: 186-92.
Oxford Dictionaries. Definition of abbreviation in English. Oxford University Press; 2018 [cited Feb 2019]. Available from URL: https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/abbreviation
Shilo L, Shilo G. Analysis of abbreviations used by residents in admission notes and discharge summaries. QJM 2018; 111: 179-83.
Sheppard JE, Weidner LC, Zakai S, Fountain-Polley S, Williams J. Ambiguous abbreviations: an audit of abbreviations in paediatric note keeping. Arch Dis Child 2008; 93: 204-6.
Koh KC, Lau KM, Yusof SA, Mohamad AI, Shahabuddin FS, Ahmat NH et al. A study on the use of abbreviations among doctors and nurses in the medical department of a tertiary hospital in Malaysia. Med J Malaysia 2015; 70: 334-40.
Liu H, Lussier YA, Friedman C. Disambiguating ambiguous biomedical terms in biomedical narrative text: an unsupervised method. J Biomed Inform 2001; 34: 249-61.
Das-Purkayastha P, McLeod K, Canter R. Specialist medical abbreviations as a foreign language. J R Soc Med 2004; 97: 456.
Awan S, Abid S, Tariq M, Zubairi ABS, Kamal A, Arshad S et al. Use of medical abbreviations and acronyms: knowledge among medical students and postgraduates. Postgrad Med J 2016; 92: 721-5.
Parakh P, Hindy P, Fruchter G. Are we speaking the same language? Acronyms in gastroenterology. Am J Gastroenterol 2011; 106: 8-9.
Sinha S, McDermott F, Srinivas G, Houghton PW. Use of abbreviations by healthcare professionals: what is the way forward? Postgrad Med J 2011; 87: 450-2.
Sherriff A, Ally H, Mahomed W, Rae H, Schanknecht R, Sealanyane S et al. The understanding of medical abbreviations across different medical departments in a South African hospital setting. Commun Med 2017; 14: 15-24.
Parvaiz MA, Subramanian A, Kendall NS. The use of abbreviations in medical records in a multidisciplinary world - an imminent disaster. Commun Med 2008; 5: 25-33.
Hamiel U, Hecht I, Nemet A, Pe'er L, Man V, Hilely A et al. Frequency, comprehension and attitudes of physicians towards abbreviations in the medical record. Postgrad Med J 2018; 94: 254-8.
Holper S, Barmanray R, Colman B, Yates CJ, Liew D, Smallwood D. Ambiguous medical abbreviation study: challenges and opportunities. Intern Med J 2020; 50: 1073-8.
Politis J, Lau S, Yeoh J, Brand C, Russell D, Liew D. Overview of shorthand medical glossary (OMG) study. Intern Med J 2015; 45: 423-7.
Chemali M, Hibbert EJ, Sheen A. General practitioner understanding of abbreviations used in hospital discharge letters. Med J Aust 2015; 203: 147.e1-4.
Macneil J, Baiol S. Mutual comprehension of urological abbreviations. J Clin Urol 2017; 10: 523-8.
Hippisley-Cox J, Pringle M, Cater R, Wynn A, Hammersley V, Coupland C et al. The electronic patient record in primary care - regression or progression? A cross sectional study [published correction appears in BMJ. 2003 Aug 30;327(7413):483]. BMJ 2003; 326: 1439-43.
Capraro A, Stack A, Harper MB, Kimia A. Detecting unapproved abbreviations in the electronic medical record. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2012; 38: 178-83.