Relative importance of climate and spatial processes in shaping species composition, functional structure and beta diversity of phytoplankton in a large river.

Biogeographical pattern Climatic heterogeneity Danube River Dispersal limitation Metacommunity structure Riverine phytoplankton

Journal

The Science of the total environment
ISSN: 1879-1026
Titre abrégé: Sci Total Environ
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 0330500

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 Feb 2022
Historique:
received: 08 04 2021
revised: 27 09 2021
accepted: 05 10 2021
pubmed: 13 10 2021
medline: 24 12 2021
entrez: 12 10 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Although metacommunity dynamics of lentic phytoplankton are relatively well-documented, studies on the role of environmental and spatial processes in shaping phytoplankton communities of large rivers are still scarce. Here, we examined six phytoplankton data sets, which were collected in 1978-2017 from large river-scale segments (mean spatial extent 1117 km) in the Danube River. Our aim was to elucidate role of climatic, spatial and temporal predictors in variation of phytoplankton beta diversity using variance partitioning for compositions of species and functional groups sensu Reynolds. We hypothesised that phytoplankton beta diversity (measured as average distance to group centroid) would be positively related to both climatic heterogeneity and spatial extent used as a proxy for dispersal limitation. Additionally, we tested alternative dispersal models to evaluate different spatial processes structuring phytoplankton community. Our results revealed that spatial variables were more important than climatic factors in controlling both species and functional group composition. Climatic heterogeneity showed significant positive relationship with beta diversity. In contrast, there was no significant relationship between beta diversity and spatial extent, suggesting that spatial effect on beta-diversity was attenuated by anthropogenic disturbance. The better performance of non-directional model compared to model of water directionality suggested that spatial dynamics of phytoplankton metacommunity was in large part regulated by differences in the regional species pools. Spatial and temporal variables outperformed environmental (including climatic) factors in explaining phytoplankton metacommunity structure, indicating that phytoplankton exhibited strong biogeographical patterns. Thus, dispersal limitation interfered with species-sorting processes in determining phytoplankton community structure. In conclusion, our findings revealed that the development of a more reliable bioassessment program of the Danube River should be based on separation into basin regions.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34637877
pii: S0048-9697(21)05969-6
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150891
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

150891

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest Authors declare no conflict of interests.

Auteurs

Alexander G Rusanov (AG)

St. Petersburg Federal Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Limnology RAS, Laboratory of Hydrobiology, 9, Sevastyanova st., St. Petersburg 196105, Russia. Electronic address: rusanov@limno.ru.

Tibor Bíró (T)

University of Public Service, Faculty of Water Sciences, Bajcsy-Zsilinszky utca 12-14, H-6500 Baja, Hungary. Electronic address: Biro.Tibor@uni-nke.hu.

Keve T Kiss (KT)

University of Public Service, Faculty of Water Sciences, Bajcsy-Zsilinszky utca 12-14, H-6500 Baja, Hungary; Centre for Ecological Research, Institute of Aquatic Ecology, Karolina út 29, H-1113 Budapest, Hungary. Electronic address: kiss.keve@ecolres.hu.

Krisztina Buczkó (K)

Centre for Ecological Research, Institute of Aquatic Ecology, Karolina út 29, H-1113 Budapest, Hungary. Electronic address: buczko.krisztina@okologia.mta.hu.

István Grigorszky (I)

University of Debrecen, Department of Hydrobiology, Egyetem tér 1., H-4032 Debrecen, Hungary. Electronic address: grigorszky.istvan@science.unideb.hu.

András Hidas (A)

Centre for Ecological Research, Institute of Aquatic Ecology, Karolina út 29, H-1113 Budapest, Hungary. Electronic address: hidas.andras@okologia.mta.hu.

Mónika Duleba (M)

Centre for Ecological Research, Institute of Aquatic Ecology, Karolina út 29, H-1113 Budapest, Hungary. Electronic address: duleba.monika@okologia.mta.hu.

Zsuzsa Trábert (Z)

Centre for Ecological Research, Institute of Aquatic Ecology, Karolina út 29, H-1113 Budapest, Hungary. Electronic address: trabert.zsuzsa@okologia.mta.hu.

Angéla Földi (A)

Centre for Ecological Research, Institute of Aquatic Ecology, Karolina út 29, H-1113 Budapest, Hungary. Electronic address: foldi.angela@okologia.mta.hu.

Éva Ács (É)

University of Public Service, Faculty of Water Sciences, Bajcsy-Zsilinszky utca 12-14, H-6500 Baja, Hungary; Centre for Ecological Research, Institute of Aquatic Ecology, Karolina út 29, H-1113 Budapest, Hungary. Electronic address: acs.eva@ecolres.hu.

Articles similaires

Rivers Turkey Biodiversity Environmental Monitoring Animals
Humans Disease Outbreaks Rivers COVID-19 Epidemiologists

Hydrochemical characterization and pCO

Kunarika Bhanot, M K Sharma, R D Kaushik
1.00
Rivers Environmental Monitoring Carbon Dioxide Water Pollutants, Chemical India
Foraminifera France Bays Environmental Monitoring Geologic Sediments

Classifications MeSH