Nivolumab versus placebo in patients with relapsed malignant mesothelioma (CONFIRM): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, phase 3 trial.
Aged
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological
/ therapeutic use
B7-H1 Antigen
/ metabolism
Double-Blind Method
Female
Humans
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors
/ therapeutic use
Male
Mesothelioma, Malignant
/ drug therapy
Nivolumab
/ therapeutic use
Peritoneal Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Pleural Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Progression-Free Survival
Recurrence
Survival Rate
Journal
The Lancet. Oncology
ISSN: 1474-5488
Titre abrégé: Lancet Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100957246
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2021
11 2021
Historique:
received:
12
06
2021
revised:
02
08
2021
accepted:
04
08
2021
pubmed:
18
10
2021
medline:
18
11
2021
entrez:
17
10
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
No phase 3 trial has yet shown improved survival for patients with pleural or peritoneal malignant mesothelioma who have progressed following platinum-based chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of nivolumab, an anti-PD-1 antibody, in these patients. This was a multicentre, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel group, randomised, phase 3 trial done in 24 hospitals in the UK. Adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, with histologically confirmed pleural or peritoneal mesothelioma, who had received previous first-line platinum-based chemotherapy and had radiological evidence of disease progression, were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive nivolumab at a flat dose of 240 mg every 2 weeks over 30 min intravenously or placebo until disease progression or a maximum of 12 months. The randomisation sequence was generated within an interactive web response system (Alea); patients were stratified according to epithelioid versus non-epithelioid histology and were assigned in random block sizes of 3 and 6. Participants and treating clinicians were masked to group allocation. The co-primary endpoints were investigator-assessed progression-free survival and overall survival, analysed according to the treatment policy estimand (an equivalent of the intention-to-treat principle). All patients who were randomly assigned were included in the safety population, reported according to group allocation. This trial is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03063450. Between May 10, 2017, and March 30, 2020, 332 patients were recruited, of whom 221 (67%) were randomly assigned to the nivolumab group and 111 (33%) were assigned to the placebo group). Median follow-up was 11·6 months (IQR 7·2-16·8). Median progression-free survival was 3·0 months (95% CI 2·8-4·1) in the nivolumab group versus 1·8 months (1·4-2·6) in the placebo group (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0·67 [95% CI 0·53-0·85; p=0·0012). Median overall survival was 10·2 months (95% CI 8·5-12·1) in the nivolumab group versus 6·9 months (5·0-8·0) in the placebo group (adjusted HR 0·69 [95% CI 0·52-0·91]; p=0·0090). The most frequently reported grade 3 or worse treatment-related adverse events were diarrhoea (six [3%] of 221 in the nivolumab group vs two [2%] of 111 in the placebo group) and infusion-related reaction (six [3%] vs none). Serious adverse events occurred in 90 (41%) patients in the nivolumab group and 49 (44%) patients in the placebo group. There were no treatment-related deaths in either group. Nivolumab represents a treatment that might be beneficial to patients with malignant mesothelioma who have progressed on first-line therapy. Stand up to Cancer-Cancer Research UK and Bristol Myers Squibb.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
No phase 3 trial has yet shown improved survival for patients with pleural or peritoneal malignant mesothelioma who have progressed following platinum-based chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of nivolumab, an anti-PD-1 antibody, in these patients.
METHODS
This was a multicentre, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel group, randomised, phase 3 trial done in 24 hospitals in the UK. Adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, with histologically confirmed pleural or peritoneal mesothelioma, who had received previous first-line platinum-based chemotherapy and had radiological evidence of disease progression, were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive nivolumab at a flat dose of 240 mg every 2 weeks over 30 min intravenously or placebo until disease progression or a maximum of 12 months. The randomisation sequence was generated within an interactive web response system (Alea); patients were stratified according to epithelioid versus non-epithelioid histology and were assigned in random block sizes of 3 and 6. Participants and treating clinicians were masked to group allocation. The co-primary endpoints were investigator-assessed progression-free survival and overall survival, analysed according to the treatment policy estimand (an equivalent of the intention-to-treat principle). All patients who were randomly assigned were included in the safety population, reported according to group allocation. This trial is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03063450.
FINDINGS
Between May 10, 2017, and March 30, 2020, 332 patients were recruited, of whom 221 (67%) were randomly assigned to the nivolumab group and 111 (33%) were assigned to the placebo group). Median follow-up was 11·6 months (IQR 7·2-16·8). Median progression-free survival was 3·0 months (95% CI 2·8-4·1) in the nivolumab group versus 1·8 months (1·4-2·6) in the placebo group (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0·67 [95% CI 0·53-0·85; p=0·0012). Median overall survival was 10·2 months (95% CI 8·5-12·1) in the nivolumab group versus 6·9 months (5·0-8·0) in the placebo group (adjusted HR 0·69 [95% CI 0·52-0·91]; p=0·0090). The most frequently reported grade 3 or worse treatment-related adverse events were diarrhoea (six [3%] of 221 in the nivolumab group vs two [2%] of 111 in the placebo group) and infusion-related reaction (six [3%] vs none). Serious adverse events occurred in 90 (41%) patients in the nivolumab group and 49 (44%) patients in the placebo group. There were no treatment-related deaths in either group.
INTERPRETATION
Nivolumab represents a treatment that might be beneficial to patients with malignant mesothelioma who have progressed on first-line therapy.
FUNDING
Stand up to Cancer-Cancer Research UK and Bristol Myers Squibb.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34656227
pii: S1470-2045(21)00471-X
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(21)00471-X
pmc: PMC8560642
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological
0
B7-H1 Antigen
0
CD274 protein, human
0
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors
0
Nivolumab
31YO63LBSN
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03063450']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase III
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1530-1540Investigateurs
Gillian Price
(G)
Paul Shaw
(P)
Judith Cave
(J)
Jay Naik
(J)
Amy Ford
(A)
Tom Geldhart
(T)
Gairin Dancey
(G)
Dionysis Papadatos
(D)
Andy Polychronis
(A)
Petra Jankowska
(P)
Angela Scott
(A)
Jill Gardiner
(J)
Mathilda Cominos
(M)
Lynn Campbell
(L)
Carol MacGregor
(C)
Lois Mullholand
(L)
Meenali Chitnis
(M)
Gary Dougherty
(G)
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of interests DAF reports grants from Astex Therapeutics, Boehringer Ingelheim, Merck Sharp & Dohme, and Bayer; personal fees from Aldeyra, Inventiva, and Paredox; non-financial support from Clovis, Eli Lilly, and Bristol Myers Squibb; and personal fees and non-financial support from Roche, during the study. GG reports grants from Jannsen-Cilag, Novartis, Astex, Roche, Heartflow, Bristol Myers Squibb, BioNtech; grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca; and personal fees from Celldex, outside the submitted work. JL reports grants from Cancer Research UK and non-financial support from Bristol Myers Squibb, during the study. CO reports personal fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, outside the submitted work. RC reports personal fees from Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Roche, and AstraZeneca, during the study. All other authors declare no competing interests.
Références
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 16;10(3):e0121071
pubmed: 25774992
Ann Oncol. 2020 Dec;31(12):1734-1745
pubmed: 32976938
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Apr;16(4):447-56
pubmed: 25800891
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jul 15;21(14):2636-44
pubmed: 12860938
Lung Cancer. 2001 Feb-Mar;31(2-3):311-7
pubmed: 11165412
Lancet Oncol. 2019 Feb;20(2):239-253
pubmed: 30660609
Clin Cancer Res. 2019 Sep 15;25(18):5485-5492
pubmed: 31164373
J Thorac Oncol. 2018 Oct;13(10):1569-1576
pubmed: 29908324
Oncoimmunology. 2017 Jul 27;6(11):e1356146
pubmed: 29147606
Lancet. 2021 Jan 30;397(10272):375-386
pubmed: 33485464
J Thorac Oncol. 2014 Jul;9(7):1036-1040
pubmed: 24926549
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Sep;18(9):1261-1273
pubmed: 28729154
Nat Rev Cancer. 2017 Jul 25;17(8):475-488
pubmed: 28740119
N Engl J Med. 2015 May 21;372(21):2018-28
pubmed: 25891174
Lancet Respir Med. 2021 Jun;9(6):585-592
pubmed: 33515500
Lung Cancer. 2009 Jan;63(1):94-7
pubmed: 18486273
Hum Pathol. 2019 May;87:11-17
pubmed: 30794891