Growth performance, visceral organ weights, and gut health of weaned pigs fed diets with different dietary fiber solubility and lipid sources.
fiber solubility
growth performance
gut health
lipid source
weaned pig
Journal
Journal of animal science
ISSN: 1525-3163
Titre abrégé: J Anim Sci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8003002
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Nov 2021
01 Nov 2021
Historique:
received:
27
07
2021
accepted:
14
10
2021
pubmed:
18
10
2021
medline:
20
11
2021
entrez:
17
10
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The objective of this study was to determine the interactive effects of dietary fiber solubility and lipid source on growth performance, visceral organ weights, gut histology, and gut microbiota composition of weaned pigs. A total of 280 nursery pigs [initial body weight (BW) = 6.84 kg] weaned at 21 d were housed in 40 pens (7 pigs/pen). The pigs were fed four diets (10 pens/diet) in a randomized complete block design in two phases: Phase 1 from 0 to 2 wk and Phase 2 from 2 to 5 wk. The diets were corn-soybean meal-based with either sugar beet pulp (SBP) or soybean hulls (SBH) as a fiber source and either soybean oil (SBO) or choice white grease (CWG) as a lipid source in a 2 × 2 factorial arrangement. The BW and feed intake were determined by phase, whereas visceral organ weights, intestinal histology, and gut microbial composition were determined at the end of the trial. Dietary fiber solubility and lipid source did not interact (P > 0.05) on average daily feed intake and average daily gain across all phases. However, the gain to feed ratio (G:F) for CWG-containing diets was lower (P < 0.05) than that for SBO-containing diets for Phase 1. Also, G:F for SBP-containing diets was lower (P < 0.05) than that for SBH-containing diets for Phase 1 and for the entire study period. Pigs fed SBP-containing diets had greater (P < 0.05) stomach weight, and tended to have greater (P < 0.10) small and large intestine weights relative to BW than those fed SBH-containing diets. Duodenal villous height to crypt depth ratio for CWG-based diets tended to be greater (P = 0.09) than that for SBO-based diets. Fiber solubility and lipid source interacted (P < 0.05) on relative abundance of Bacteroides in the colon such that the relative abundance of the Bacteroides for CWG was greater (P < 0.05) than that for the SBO in SBP-based diet, but not in SBH-based diet. Relative abundance of Butyricicoccus in the colon for SBH-based diet was greater (P < 0.05) than that for SBP-based diet. In conclusion, inclusion of SBH instead of SBP in corn-soybean meal-based diets for weaned pigs can result in increased feed efficiency and relative abundance of Butyricicoccus in the colon, which is associated with improved gut health. Also, inclusion of SBO instead of CWG in the diets for weaned pigs can result in improved feed efficiency during Phase 1 feeding; however, the pigs may recover from the low feed efficiency induced by dietary inclusion of CWG instead of SBO after Phase 1 feeding.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34657148
pii: 6398708
doi: 10.1093/jas/skab292
pmc: PMC8598925
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Dietary Fiber
0
Soybean Oil
8001-22-7
Types de publication
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial, Veterinary
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : South Dakota State University Agricultural Experiment Station
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Références
Biochim Biophys Acta. 1994 Sep 15;1214(2):148-60
pubmed: 7918595
Food Funct. 2020 Dec 1;11(12):10758-10773
pubmed: 33231591
Br Poult Sci. 2018 Aug;59(4):422-429
pubmed: 29620417
Animal. 2014 Nov;8(11):1777-87
pubmed: 25046106
Nutrients. 2019 Feb 16;11(2):
pubmed: 30781503
Int J Mol Sci. 2018 Aug 15;19(8):
pubmed: 30111703
ACS Omega. 2019 Sep 04;4(12):15158-15167
pubmed: 31552361
Br J Nutr. 2019 Feb;121(4):469-480
pubmed: 30526712
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2014 Jan;87(1):30-40
pubmed: 23909466
J Anim Sci. 2004 Sep;82(9):2615-22
pubmed: 15446478
Aging (Albany NY). 2020 May 25;12(10):9173-9187
pubmed: 32452830
PLoS One. 2013;8(4):e59581
pubmed: 23573202
J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 2004 Dec;88(11-12):367-80
pubmed: 15584946
Eur J Nutr. 2021 Sep;60(6):3279-3301
pubmed: 33591390
Microbiome. 2020 Feb 11;8(1):15
pubmed: 32046785
Br J Nutr. 1991 Mar;65(2):217-32
pubmed: 1645992
Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2007 May;91(4):303-14
pubmed: 17072533
Eur J Nutr. 2021 Feb;60(1):89-99
pubmed: 32193633
J Nutr. 1994 Aug;124(8 Suppl):1377S-1382S
pubmed: 8064387
Br J Nutr. 2014 Dec 14;112(11):1837-49
pubmed: 25327182
J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2018 Aug 21;9:56
pubmed: 30167305
J Dairy Sci. 1991 Oct;74(10):3583-97
pubmed: 1660498
Gastroenterology. 2009 Nov;137(5):1716-24.e1-2
pubmed: 19706296
J AOAC Int. 2012 May-Jun;95(3):824-44
pubmed: 22816275
J Anim Sci. 2012 Dec;90 Suppl 4:318-20
pubmed: 23365366
Poult Sci. 2010 Oct;89(10):2197-212
pubmed: 20852111
J Anim Sci. 2017 Jun;95(6):2593-2604
pubmed: 28727030
Gut Microbes. 2012 Jul-Aug;3(4):289-306
pubmed: 22572875
Sci Rep. 2018 Apr 12;8(1):5880
pubmed: 29651010
J Anim Sci. 2020 Dec 1;98(12):
pubmed: 33295982
J Anim Sci. 2004 Oct;82(10):2937-44
pubmed: 15484945
Lancet. 1989 Oct 28;2(8670):1008-10
pubmed: 2572741
J Anim Sci. 2017 Feb;95(2):727-739
pubmed: 28380581
Sci Rep. 2017 Jul 17;7(1):5621
pubmed: 28717237
Front Microbiol. 2016 Sep 21;7:1416
pubmed: 27708624
J Agric Food Chem. 2001 May;49(5):2322-6
pubmed: 11368597
Poult Sci. 2014 Sep;93(9):2380-93
pubmed: 25012855
Front Microbiol. 2020 May 07;11:859
pubmed: 32457725
Arch Anim Nutr. 2006 Oct;60(5):390-401
pubmed: 17036748
Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2017 Apr;30(4):531-537
pubmed: 27507180
mSystems. 2018 Nov 6;3(6):
pubmed: 30417112
Anim Health Res Rev. 2012 Jun;13(1):100-9
pubmed: 22853934
J Anim Sci. 2006 Apr;84(4):843-52
pubmed: 16543561
J Anim Sci. 1995 Dec;73(12):3639-48
pubmed: 8655439
Gastroenterology. 1995 Jun;108(6):1745-52
pubmed: 7768379