The culture of research communication in neonatal intensive care units: key stakeholder perspectives.
Journal
Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association
ISSN: 1476-5543
Titre abrégé: J Perinatol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8501884
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 2021
12 2021
Historique:
received:
14
12
2020
accepted:
22
09
2021
revised:
30
07
2021
pubmed:
20
10
2021
medline:
19
2
2022
entrez:
19
10
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To assess the perspectives of neonatologists, neonatal nurses, and parents on research-related education and communication practices in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Questionnaire circulated through interest groups and administered using the internet. 323 respondents responded to the survey. 52 were neonatologists, 188 were neonatal nurses, and 83 were parents of NICU graduates. Analysis was descriptive. Differences were noted between stakeholder groups with respect to whether current medications meet the needs of sick neonates, research as central to the mission of the NICU, availability of appropriate education/training for all members of the research team, and adequacy of information provided to parents before, during, and after a research study is completed. Engagement of nurses and parents at all stages of NICU research is currently suboptimal; relevant good practices, including education, should be shared among neonatal units.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34663901
doi: 10.1038/s41372-021-01220-5
pii: 10.1038/s41372-021-01220-5
pmc: PMC8752437
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2826-2833Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
Pediatrics. 2003 Apr;111(4 Pt 2):e482-8
pubmed: 12671168
Trials. 2015 Nov 04;16:502
pubmed: 26537492
J Perinatol. 2004 Dec;24(12):783-91
pubmed: 15372063
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 05;11(8):e0160947
pubmed: 27494396
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2015 Mar;79(3):370-8
pubmed: 25041601
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2010 Jun;5(2):47-55
pubmed: 20569149
Perspect Clin Res. 2013 Jan;4(1):89-99
pubmed: 23533990
Acta Paediatr. 2014 Oct;103(10):1035-8
pubmed: 24920539
Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015 Dec;20(6):436-41
pubmed: 26497942
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2003 Jul;88(4):F280-5; discussion F285-6
pubmed: 12819158
PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e21604
pubmed: 21765898
Neonatology. 2019;115(4):328-334
pubmed: 30836358
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012 Oct;25(10):2126-9
pubmed: 22191692
Clin Trials. 2015 Jun;12(3):246-56
pubmed: 25691600
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011 Oct;24 Suppl 1:135-7
pubmed: 21942613
Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Jul;104(7):1518-1525
pubmed: 33423822
Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed. 2017 Feb;102(1):51-54
pubmed: 27450458
Pediatr Res. 2016 Oct;80(4):462-4
pubmed: 27384407
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2019 Sep;53(5):609-614
pubmed: 30983385
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2006 Sep;91(5):F374-6
pubmed: 16923938
BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2015 Feb 11;4(1):
pubmed: 26734365
J Genet Couns. 2018 Feb;27(1):263-273
pubmed: 28932961
Implement Sci. 2014 Jan 08;9:6
pubmed: 24401288
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2016 Dec;82(6):1410-1411
pubmed: 27696484
JAMA Pediatr. 2015 Oct;169(10):887-8
pubmed: 26258395
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2019 Sep;53(5):615-617
pubmed: 30621453