Generation of False-Positive SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Results with Testing Conditions outside Manufacturer Recommendations: A Scientific Approach to Pandemic Misinformation.
COVID-19
Panbio
SARS-CoV-2
antigen
clinical methods
diagnostics
epidemiology
false positive
virology
Journal
Microbiology spectrum
ISSN: 2165-0497
Titre abrégé: Microbiol Spectr
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101634614
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
31 10 2021
31 10 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
21
10
2021
medline:
17
11
2021
entrez:
20
10
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Antigen-based rapid diagnostics tests (Ag-RDTs) are useful tools for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) detection. However, misleading demonstrations of the Abbott Panbio coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) Ag-RDT on social media claimed that SARS-CoV-2 antigen could be detected in municipal water and food products. To offer a scientific rebuttal to pandemic misinformation and disinformation, this study explored the impact of using the Panbio SARS-CoV-2 assay with conditions falling outside manufacturer recommendations. Using Panbio, various water and food products, laboratory buffers, and SARS-CoV-2-negative clinical specimens were tested with and without manufacturer buffer. Additional experiments were conducted to assess the role of each Panbio buffer component (tricine, NaCl, pH, and Tween 20) as well as the impact of temperature (4°C, 20°C, and 45°C) and humidity (90%) on assay performance. Direct sample testing (without the kit buffer) resulted in false-positive signals resembling those obtained with SARS-CoV-2 positive controls tested under proper conditions. The likely explanation of these artifacts is nonspecific interactions between the SARS-CoV-2-specific conjugated and capture antibodies, as proteinase K treatment abrogated this phenomenon, and thermal shift assays showed pH-induced conformational changes under conditions promoting artifact formation. Omitting, altering, and reverse engineering the kit buffer all supported the importance of maintaining buffering capacity, ionic strength, and pH for accurate kit function. Interestingly, the Panbio assay could tolerate some extremes of temperature and humidity outside manufacturer claims. Our data support strict adherence to manufacturer instructions to avoid false-positive SARS-CoV-2 Ag-RDT reactions, otherwise resulting in anxiety, overuse of public health resources, and dissemination of misinformation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34668722
doi: 10.1128/Spectrum.00683-21
pmc: PMC8528119
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antigens, Viral
0
Buffers
0
Drinking Water
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0068321Références
Biophys Rev. 2020 Feb;12(1):85-104
pubmed: 32006251
J Virol Methods. 2020 Nov;285:113948
pubmed: 32783913
Euro Surveill. 2021 Nov;26(44):
pubmed: 34738515
J Clin Virol. 2021 May;138:104796
pubmed: 33773413
Ann Clin Biochem. 1999 Nov;36 ( Pt 6):704-21
pubmed: 10586307
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021 Mar;27(3):472.e7-472.e10
pubmed: 33189872
Malar J. 2010 Jul 22;9:215
pubmed: 20650003
Mol Microbiol. 2016 Jan;99(2):236-53
pubmed: 26395460
J Clin Virol. 2020 Jul;128:104442
pubmed: 32540034
Lancet Respir Med. 2020 Dec;8(12):1167-1168
pubmed: 33007240
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Jan 18;7:589080
pubmed: 33537325
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2021 Aug;40(8):1721-1726
pubmed: 33742322
Parasit Vectors. 2016 May 05;9:267
pubmed: 27151313
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2021 May 12;34(3):
pubmed: 33980687
J Bacteriol. 2013 Feb;195(4):740-56
pubmed: 23222727
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2020 Jun 30;7(7):ofaa269
pubmed: 32704517
J Clin Virol. 2020 Dec;133:104659
pubmed: 33160179
J Virol Methods. 2021 Sep;295:114184
pubmed: 34029634
Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Feb;103:23-24
pubmed: 33212261
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021 Feb 16;:
pubmed: 33601009
EClinicalMedicine. 2021 Jan;31:100677
pubmed: 33521610