Benefit of Stimulus Size V Perimetry for Patients With a Dense Central Scotoma From Leber's Hereditary Optic Neuropathy.


Journal

Translational vision science & technology
ISSN: 2164-2591
Titre abrégé: Transl Vis Sci Technol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101595919

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 10 2021
Historique:
entrez: 21 10 2021
pubmed: 22 10 2021
medline: 26 10 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Leber's hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON) is the most common mtDNA optic neuropathy. It most frequently causes dense bilateral central scotomas that are often characterized in clinical studies by Humphrey visual field testing (HVF) using a stimulus size III. This provides numerical quantification of the visual field defect using the mean deviation. However, this size III testing strategy has limitations. We used stimulus size V to monitor these patients and evaluated intertest variability and dynamic range to determine the testing reliability and reproducibility. This was a longitudinal retrospective cohort study comparing Stimulus III and Stimulus V HVF of 62 LHON patients who had reached the plateau stage of the disease. The intertest variability and mean defect were calculated for both stimulus sizes for 38 patients. The mean defect for stimulus size V was calculated using an algorithm developed by the University of Iowa Visual Field Reading Center. Stimulus size V HVFs had lower inter-test variability as measured by mean defect standard deviation (Z = 169, P < 0.01). The floor effect seen with Stimulus III HVF in LHON, was less pronounced with Stimulus V HVF. The correlation of stimulus size III and V mean defect was strong (r = 0.90, P < 0.01), and a mathematical model was constructed to calculate the Stimulus size V mean defect from the Stimulus size III results (MDstimV = 0.988 x MDStimIII + 1.35, R2 = 0.82 P < 0.01). Stimulus size V HVF had lower intertest variability and a better dynamic range than Stimulus size III HVF in LHON patients. This makes the stimulus V HVF a more reliable metric to follow LHON patients especially in clinical trials. The mathematical model presented can be used to generate a Stimulus V equivalent mean defect from Stimulus III HVFs. Using Stimulus V HVF in LHON patients increases its ability to detect and quantify a response to treatment, making it a useful metric for future LHON clinical trials and the clinical setting.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34673906
pii: 2778011
doi: 10.1167/tvst.10.12.31
pmc: PMC8543387
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

31

Références

Am J Hum Genet. 2016 Jun 2;98(6):1271
pubmed: 27259056
J Neuroophthalmol. 2017 Dec;37(4):371-381
pubmed: 28991104
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2015 Mar 27;4(2):10
pubmed: 25883877
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1991;229(3):228-31
pubmed: 1869056
PLoS Med. 2007 Oct 16;4(10):e296
pubmed: 17941714
Ophthalmology. 1996 Mar;103(3):504-14
pubmed: 8600429
J Ophthalmol. 2018 Mar 21;2018:5985702
pubmed: 29750122
Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 1998 Aug;76(4):431-7
pubmed: 9716329
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013 Feb 15;54(2):1345-51
pubmed: 23341012
Ophthalmology. 2020 May;127(5):679-688
pubmed: 31932089
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2018 Jan 1;59(1):439-445
pubmed: 29356822
J Epidemiol. 2017 Sep;27(9):447-450
pubmed: 28392196
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2014 Sep 25;3(5):6
pubmed: 25371855
Arch Ophthalmol. 2010 May;128(5):570-6
pubmed: 20457977
Prog Retin Eye Res. 2004 Jan;23(1):53-89
pubmed: 14766317
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016 Mar;57(3):1370-5
pubmed: 27007794
Am J Ophthalmol. 2006 Jun;141(6):1061-1067
pubmed: 16765674
Ophthalmology. 2010 Mar;117(3):623-7
pubmed: 20031228
Arch Ophthalmol. 2008 Apr;126(4):473-9
pubmed: 18413515
BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 15;9(3):e025307
pubmed: 30878986
Am J Ophthalmol. 2004 Feb;137(2):271-7
pubmed: 14962416
Am J Ophthalmol. 1991 Jun 15;111(6):750-62
pubmed: 2039048
Eur J Hum Genet. 2007 Oct;15(10):1079-89
pubmed: 17406640
Ophthalmology. 2017 Jun;124(6):843-850
pubmed: 28196731
Lancet. 2006 Jul 1;368(9529):70-82
pubmed: 16815381
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016 Jan 1;57(1):288-94
pubmed: 26824408

Auteurs

Alvaro J Mejia-Vergara (AJ)

Department of Ophthalmology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Doheny Eye Institute, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Department of Ophthalmology, Oftlamo-Sanitas Eye Institute, School of Medicine, Fundación Universitaria Sanitas, Bogotá, Colombia.
Department of Ophthalmology, Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogotá, Colombia.

Alfredo A Sadun (AA)

Department of Ophthalmology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Doheny Eye Institute, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Alexander F Chen (AF)

Doheny Eye Institute, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Michael F Smith (MF)

University of Iowa, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Iowa City, IA, USA.

Michael Wall (M)

University of Iowa, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Iowa City, IA, USA.

Rustum Karanjia (R)

Department of Ophthalmology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Doheny Eye Institute, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Department of Ophthalmology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH