Utilisation Trend of Long-Acting Insulin Analogues including Biosimilars across Europe: Findings and Implications.
Journal
BioMed research international
ISSN: 2314-6141
Titre abrégé: Biomed Res Int
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101600173
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
26
03
2021
accepted:
06
08
2021
entrez:
22
10
2021
pubmed:
23
10
2021
medline:
9
2
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Diabetes mellitus rates and associated costs continue to rise across Europe enhancing health authority focus on its management. The risk of complications is enhanced by poor glycaemic control, with long-acting insulin analogues developed to reduce hypoglycaemia and improve patient convenience. There are concerns though with their considerably higher costs, but moderated by reductions in complications and associated costs. Biosimilars can help further reduce costs. However, to date, price reductions for biosimilar insulin glargine appear limited. In addition, the originator company has switched promotional efforts to more concentrated patented formulations to reduce the impact of biosimilars. There are also concerns with different devices between the manufacturers. As a result, there is a need to assess current utilisation rates for insulins, especially long-acting insulin analogues and biosimilars, and the rationale for patterns seen, among multiple European countries to provide future direction. Typically increasing use of long-acting insulin analogues across Europe including both Western and Central and Eastern European countries reflects perceived patient benefits despite higher prices. However, activities by the originator company to switch patients to more concentrated insulin glargine coupled with lowering prices towards biosimilars have limited biosimilar uptake, with biosimilars not currently launched in a minority of European countries. A number of activities were identified to address this. Enhancing the attractiveness of the biosimilar insulin market is essential to encourage other biosimilar manufacturers to enter the market as more long-acting insulin analogues lose their patents to benefit all key stakeholder groups. There are concerns with the availability and use of insulin glargine biosimilars among European countries despite lower costs. This can be addressed.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Diabetes mellitus rates and associated costs continue to rise across Europe enhancing health authority focus on its management. The risk of complications is enhanced by poor glycaemic control, with long-acting insulin analogues developed to reduce hypoglycaemia and improve patient convenience. There are concerns though with their considerably higher costs, but moderated by reductions in complications and associated costs. Biosimilars can help further reduce costs. However, to date, price reductions for biosimilar insulin glargine appear limited. In addition, the originator company has switched promotional efforts to more concentrated patented formulations to reduce the impact of biosimilars. There are also concerns with different devices between the manufacturers. As a result, there is a need to assess current utilisation rates for insulins, especially long-acting insulin analogues and biosimilars, and the rationale for patterns seen, among multiple European countries to provide future direction.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Typically increasing use of long-acting insulin analogues across Europe including both Western and Central and Eastern European countries reflects perceived patient benefits despite higher prices. However, activities by the originator company to switch patients to more concentrated insulin glargine coupled with lowering prices towards biosimilars have limited biosimilar uptake, with biosimilars not currently launched in a minority of European countries. A number of activities were identified to address this. Enhancing the attractiveness of the biosimilar insulin market is essential to encourage other biosimilar manufacturers to enter the market as more long-acting insulin analogues lose their patents to benefit all key stakeholder groups.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
There are concerns with the availability and use of insulin glargine biosimilars among European countries despite lower costs. This can be addressed.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34676266
doi: 10.1155/2021/9996193
pmc: PMC8526244
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals
0
Hypoglycemic Agents
0
Insulin, Long-Acting
0
Insulin Glargine
2ZM8CX04RZ
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
9996193Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Brian Godman et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have no relevant conflicts of interest to declare. However, a number of the coauthors work for health authorities or are advisers to them.
Références
J Pak Med Assoc. 2014 Sep;64(9):1090-3
pubmed: 25823196
Front Pharmacol. 2017 Jun 08;8:288
pubmed: 28642700
World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Feb 14;21(6):1728-37
pubmed: 25684937
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2020 May;86(5):852-860
pubmed: 31782975
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Jan 14;11:582154
pubmed: 33628172
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2011 Feb;11(1):121-9
pubmed: 21351864
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2017 Nov;133:40-49
pubmed: 28888148
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2020 Mar;161:108053
pubmed: 32035117
Diabetes Care. 2016 Aug;39 Suppl 2:S172-9
pubmed: 27440830
Front Pharmacol. 2014 Jun 17;5:106
pubmed: 24987370
Postgrad Med J. 2016 Mar;92(1085):152-64
pubmed: 26842973
BMJ. 2010 Jun 01;340:c2548
pubmed: 20516014
J Comp Eff Res. 2021 Aug;10(12):1019-1052
pubmed: 34241546
BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Jun 11;4(3):e001410
pubmed: 31263585
Front Pharmacol. 2018 Jan 18;8:942
pubmed: 29403372
BMC Med. 2012 Nov 20;10:142
pubmed: 23167972
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Jan 08;11:591134
pubmed: 33519450
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2020 Feb;18(1):5-16
pubmed: 31696433
Curr Med Res Opin. 2021 Sep;37(9):1529-1545
pubmed: 34166174
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Jun 1;180(6):902-903
pubmed: 32227137
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2016 Oct;16(5):609-618
pubmed: 26671843
Expert Rev Respir Med. 2019 Jul;13(7):679-689
pubmed: 31189394
PLoS Med. 2013;10(6):e1001460
pubmed: 23750120
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2014 Jul;2(7):553-61
pubmed: 24794703
Adv Ther. 2020 May;37(5):2413-2426
pubmed: 32306247
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2013 Aug;13(4):469-82
pubmed: 23977975
BMJ Open. 2016 Jan 13;6(1):e010210
pubmed: 26769791
Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2018 Nov;18(4):e447-e454
pubmed: 30988962
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016 Mar;4(3):275-285
pubmed: 26857998
Am J Manag Care. 2018 Jul;24(8 Spec No.):SP265-SP272
pubmed: 30020738
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Aug;36(8):2414-2426
pubmed: 33742305
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2010 Dec;10(6):707-22
pubmed: 21155704
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2020 Dec;20(6):653-659
pubmed: 31510811
Diabetologia. 2021 May;64(5):954-962
pubmed: 33483763
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2016;16(2):149-52
pubmed: 26914489
BMC Endocr Disord. 2019 Dec 3;19(1):132
pubmed: 31796048
Pharmacoeconomics. 2011 Oct;29(10):875-82
pubmed: 21797288
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Nov 9;11:CD005613
pubmed: 33166419
Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2015 Feb;13(2):279-89
pubmed: 25495147
Lancet Public Health. 2019 Dec;4(12):e597-e598
pubmed: 31759895
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Apr;20(4):1040-1043
pubmed: 29135080
Diabetes Care. 2018 May;41(5):963-970
pubmed: 29475843
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019 May;7(5):385-396
pubmed: 30926258
Health Policy. 2010 Mar;94(3):221-9
pubmed: 19879009
J Diabetes Res. 2018 Feb 12;2018:2052101
pubmed: 29619381
BMC Med. 2014 Jun 13;12:98
pubmed: 24927744
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019 Jan;7(1):25-33
pubmed: 30470520
Diabetes Care. 2020 Aug;43(8):1767-1773
pubmed: 32527798
Int J Clin Pract. 2013 Sep;67(9):853-62
pubmed: 23560825
Front Pharmacol. 2011 Jan 07;1:141
pubmed: 21833180
J Diabetes Complications. 2009 Jan-Feb;23(1):7-11
pubmed: 18413176
Presse Med. 2018 Oct;47(10):854-866
pubmed: 30262205
Acta Diabetol. 2015 Aug;52(4):649-62
pubmed: 25585592
Int J Clin Pract. 2014 Jun;68(6):692-9
pubmed: 24548693
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 28;12(8):e0182081
pubmed: 28846690
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2014 Feb;12(1):19-32
pubmed: 24385261
Acta Diabetol. 2019 Mar;56(3):355-364
pubmed: 30506484
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2011 Aug;11(4):469-79
pubmed: 21831028
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2018 Dec;18(6):655-666
pubmed: 30014725
Global Health. 2020 Jul 16;16(1):64
pubmed: 32677998
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2020 Jun 22;12:333-343
pubmed: 32606850
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2019 Jan;35(2):106-115
pubmed: 30922418
J Comp Eff Res. 2019 May;8(7):535-547
pubmed: 31023070
Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Jan;73(1):198-206
pubmed: 23467636
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2020 Jun;8(1):
pubmed: 32546549
J Med Econ. 2020 Nov;23(11):1311-1320
pubmed: 32746676
Front Public Health. 2020 Dec 14;8:585832
pubmed: 33381485
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2019 Sep 3;7(1):e000664
pubmed: 31543973
World J Gastroenterol. 2017 Sep 14;23(34):6294-6305
pubmed: 28974896
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2013 Aug;11(4):383-93
pubmed: 23754677
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2016 Sep;18(9):907-15
pubmed: 27161418
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2020 Oct 21;13:2261-2280
pubmed: 33117004
BMJ Open. 2017 Jun 21;7(6):e016730
pubmed: 28637743
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019 Jan;21(1):129-135
pubmed: 30112792
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Jul;20(7):1787-1792
pubmed: 29536603
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2015 Apr;17(4):386-94
pubmed: 25641260
BMC Public Health. 2020 Sep 17;20(1):1415
pubmed: 32943028
Can J Diabetes. 2019 Oct;43(7):504-509.e1
pubmed: 31256905
Adv Ther. 2018 Jan;35(1):43-55
pubmed: 29313285
CNS Drugs. 2019 May;33(5):431-456
pubmed: 30963507
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2019 Jun;53(6):509-527
pubmed: 30957510
Patient. 2018 Aug;11(4):377-389
pubmed: 29322308
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2017 Feb;15(1):85-93
pubmed: 27587010
Pharmacoeconomics. 2017 Dec;35(12):1271-1285
pubmed: 28836222
BioDrugs. 2020 Apr;34(2):245-251
pubmed: 32215829
Front Pharmacol. 2017 Aug 23;8:497
pubmed: 28878667
Front Pharmacol. 2019 Mar 28;10:279
pubmed: 30983996
Diabet Med. 2019 Jun;36(6):726-733
pubmed: 30888075
Pharmacoeconomics. 2019 May;37(5):627-630
pubmed: 30847759
Front Pharmacol. 2020 Sep 11;11:1205
pubmed: 33071775
Adv Ther. 2020 Sep;37(9):3863-3877
pubmed: 32681460
Hosp Pract (1995). 2021 Oct;49(4):266-272
pubmed: 33734004
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Mar;20(3):541-548
pubmed: 28862801
Front Pharmacol. 2020 Mar 03;11:144
pubmed: 32194401
Curr Diab Rep. 2018 Jun 16;18(8):48
pubmed: 29907884
J Comp Eff Res. 2012 Nov;1(6):527-38
pubmed: 24236472
J Med Econ. 2017 Sep;20(9):991-999
pubmed: 28649943
Curr Med Res Opin. 2007 Dec;23(12):3131-6
pubmed: 17988433
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2020 Apr 2;18:15
pubmed: 32265598
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2020 Mar;22(3):365-372
pubmed: 31691472
Lancet. 2021 Dec 19;396(10267):2019-2082
pubmed: 33189186
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2015;15(5):755-8
pubmed: 26368060
Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2018 May-Jun;22(3):379-386
pubmed: 30090731
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 4;3:CD013498
pubmed: 33662147
Lancet. 2020 May 30;395(10238):1678-1680
pubmed: 32401713
BMJ Glob Health. 2018 Sep 25;3(5):e000850
pubmed: 30271626
Front Pharmacol. 2014 Oct 08;5:219
pubmed: 25339902
J Med Econ. 2019 Aug;22(8):722-727
pubmed: 30913928
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2011 Jun;11(3):343-9
pubmed: 21671703
Diabetes Ther. 2020 Nov;11(11):2555-2593
pubmed: 32975710
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2013 Dec;11(6):677-85
pubmed: 24105097
Diabet Med. 2015 Apr;32(4):459-66
pubmed: 25439048