Effect of Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy on the Survival Rate of Patients with Peritoneal Carcinomatosis of Gastric Origin.

Gastric cancer Overall survival Peritoneal carcinoma Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) Systemic chemotherapy

Journal

Journal of gastrointestinal cancer
ISSN: 1941-6636
Titre abrégé: J Gastrointest Cancer
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101479627

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Dec 2022
Historique:
accepted: 20 08 2021
pubmed: 23 10 2021
medline: 5 11 2022
entrez: 22 10 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a new surgical technique for the treatment of initially unresectable peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC). Our objective was to compare the results of PIPAC associated with systemic chemotherapy (PIPAC_CHEM) with those of systemic chemotherapy alone (ONLY_CHEM) in patients with gastric PC without metastasis other than peritoneal, and the WHO performance status < 3. This was a retrospective, single center, comparative non-randomized study. Seventeen PIPAC_CHEM patients were compared to 29 ONLY_CHEM patients. The primary endpoint was overall survival at 6 months from diagnosis of PC. Ninety-eight patients were screened and 46 were included (PIPAC_CHEM, n = 17; ONLY_CHEM, n = 29). The PIPAC_ CHEM population was significantly younger (median 64 years [56; 68] vs 74 years [61; 79]; p = 0.0054). Median PIPAC session per patient is 2 [1-3]. Six-month survival was significantly higher in the PIPAC_CHEM group than in the ONLY_CHEM group 16/17 (94.1% [65-99.2]) vs 19/29 (65.5% [45.4-79.7]), respectively; p = 0.029. Over the entire follow-up, median survival [95% CI] was 12.8 months [7.2-34.3] with PIPAC vs 9.1 months [5.4-11.5] without, p = 0.056. At 6 months, median length of additional hospitalization was significantly less for PIPAC_CHEM (median 2 days [2-7]) than without PIPAC (median 11 days [3-21]) (p = 0.045). The overall survival at 6 months after the diagnosis of carcinomatosis was significantly better for PIPAC_CHEM patients. This difference appears to continue until at least 18 months. At 6 months, days of additional hospitalization was significantly less in the PIPAC_CHEM group. Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT 04,879,953.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34677795
doi: 10.1007/s12029-021-00698-8
pii: 10.1007/s12029-021-00698-8
doi:

Substances chimiques

Aerosols 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

971-979

Informations de copyright

© 2021. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Références

Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:394–424.
doi: 10.3322/caac.21492 pubmed: 30207593
Coccolini F, Cotte E, Glehen O, Lotti M, Poiasina E, Catena F, et al. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer. Meta-analysis of randomized trials. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2014;40:12–26.
Sadeghi B, Arvieux C, Glehen O, Beaujard AC, Rivoire M, Baulieux J, et al. Peritoneal carcinomatosis from non-gynecologic malignancies: results of the EVOCAPE 1 multicentric prospective study. Cancer. 2000;88:358–63.
doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(20000115)88:2<358::AID-CNCR16>3.0.CO;2-O pubmed: 10640968
Dehal A, Smith JJ, Nash GM. Cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy: an evidence-based review-past, present and future. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2016;7:143–57.
pubmed: 26941992 pmcid: 4754310
Franko J, Shi Q, Meyers JP, Maughan TS, Adams RA, Seymour MT, et al. Prognosis of patients with peritoneal metastatic colorectal cancer given systemic therapy: an analysis of individual patient data from prospective randomised trials from the Analysis and Research in Cancers of the Digestive System (ARCAD) database. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17:1709–19.
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30500-9 pubmed: 27743922
Bonnot P-E, Piessen G, Kepenekian V, Decullier E, Pocard M, Meunier B, et al. Cytoreductive surgery with or without hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for gastric cancer with peritoneal metastases (CYTO-CHIP study): a propensity score analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37:2028–40.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.01688 pubmed: 31084544
van Driel WJ, Koole SN, Sikorska K, Schagen van Leeuwen JH, Schreuder HWR, Hermans RHM, et al. Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:230–40.
Solaß W, Hetzel A, Nadiradze G, Sagynaliev E, Reymond MA. Description of a novel approach for intraperitoneal drug delivery and the related device. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:1849–55.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2148-0 pubmed: 22580869
Khomyakov V, Ryabov A, Ivanov A, Bolotina L, Utkina A, Volchenko N, et al. Bidirectional chemotherapy in gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis combining intravenous XELOX with intraperitoneal chemotherapy with low-dose cisplatin and Doxorubicin administered as a pressurized aerosol: an open-label, Phase-2 study (PIPAC-GA2). Pleura Peritoneum. 2016;1:159–66.
doi: 10.1515/pp-2016-0017 pubmed: 30911619 pmcid: 6386494
Nadiradze G, Giger-Pabst U, Zieren J, Strumberg D, Solass W, Reymond M-A. Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) with Low-Dose Cisplatin and Doxorubicin in Gastric Peritoneal Metastasis. J Gastrointest Surg. 2016;20:367–73.
doi: 10.1007/s11605-015-2995-9 pubmed: 26511950
Alyami M, Bonnot P-E, Mercier F, Laplace N, Villeneuve L, Passot G, et al. Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) for unresectable peritoneal metastasis from gastric cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021;47:123–7.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.05.021 pubmed: 32561204
Alyami M, Hübner M, Grass F, Bakrin N, Villeneuve L, Laplace N, et al. Pressurised intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy: rationale, evidence, and potential indications. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20:e368–77.
doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30318-3 pubmed: 31267971
Jacquet P, Sugarbaker PH. Clinical research methodologies in diagnosis and staging of patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis. Cancer Treat Res. 1996;82:359–74.
doi: 10.1007/978-1-4613-1247-5_23 pubmed: 8849962
Alyami M, Sgarbura O, Khomyakov V, Horvath P, Vizzielli G, So J, et al. Standardizing training for Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020;46:2270–5.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.05.007 pubmed: 32561205
Solass W, Kerb R, Mürdter T, Giger-Pabst U, Strumberg D, Tempfer C, et al. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy of peritoneal carcinomatosis using pressurized aerosol as an alternative to liquid solution: first evidence for efficacy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:553–9.
doi: 10.1245/s10434-013-3213-1 pubmed: 24006094
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–13.
doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae pubmed: 15273542 pmcid: 1360123
Thomassen I, van Gestel YR, van Ramshorst B, Luyer MD, Bosscha K, Nienhuijs SW, et al. Peritoneal carcinomatosis of gastric origin: a population-based study on incidence, survival and risk factors. Int J Cancer. 2014;134:622–8.
doi: 10.1002/ijc.28373 pubmed: 23832847
Eveno C, Jouvin I, Pocard M. PIPAC EstoK 01: Pressurized IntraPeritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy with cisplatin and doxorubicin (PIPAC C/D) in gastric peritoneal metastasis: a randomized and multicenter phase II study. Pleura Peritoneum. 2018;3:20180116.
doi: 10.1515/pp-2018-0116 pubmed: 30911659 pmcid: 6405009
Oliver Goetze T, Al-Batran S-E, Pabst U, Reymond M, Tempfer C, Bechstein WO, et al. Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) in combination with standard of care chemotherapy in primarily untreated chemo naïve upper gi-adenocarcinomas with peritoneal seeding - a phase II/III trial of the AIO/CAOGI/ACO. Pleura Peritoneum. 2018;3:20180113.
doi: 10.1515/pp-2018-0113 pubmed: 30911658 pmcid: 6404998

Auteurs

Fatah Tidadini (F)

Department of Digestive and Emergency Surgery, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France.
Lyon Center for lnnovation in Cancer- EA 3738, Lyon 1 University, Lyon, EA, France.

Julio Abba (J)

Department of Digestive and Emergency Surgery, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France.

Jean-Louis Quesada (JL)

Clinical Pharmacology Unit, INSERM CIC1406, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France.

Magalie Baudrant (M)

Department of Digestive and Emergency Surgery, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France.

Aline Bonne (A)

Department of Digestive and Emergency Surgery, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France.

Alison Foote (A)

Clinical Pharmacology Unit, INSERM CIC1406, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France.

Jean-Luc Faucheron (JL)

Department of Digestive and Emergency Surgery, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France.

Olivier Glehen (O)

Lyon Center for lnnovation in Cancer- EA 3738, Lyon 1 University, Lyon, EA, France.

Laurent Villeneuve (L)

Lyon Center for lnnovation in Cancer- EA 3738, Lyon 1 University, Lyon, EA, France.

Catherine Arvieux (C)

Department of Digestive and Emergency Surgery, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France. carvieux@chu-grenoble.fr.
Lyon Center for lnnovation in Cancer- EA 3738, Lyon 1 University, Lyon, EA, France. carvieux@chu-grenoble.fr.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH