Towards harmonizing clinical linear energy transfer (LET) reporting in proton radiotherapy: a European multi-centric study.
Proton therapy
linear energy transfer (LET)
multi-centric study
relative biological effectiveness (RBE)
Journal
Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden)
ISSN: 1651-226X
Titre abrégé: Acta Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8709065
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2022
Feb 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
24
10
2021
medline:
5
2
2022
entrez:
23
10
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Clinical data suggest that the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) in proton therapy (PT) varies with linear energy transfer (LET). However, LET calculations are neither standardized nor available in clinical routine. Here, the status of LET calculations among European PT institutions and their comparability are assessed. Eight European PT institutions used suitable treatment planning systems with their center-specific beam model to create treatment plans in a water phantom covering different field arrangements and fulfilling commonly agreed dose objectives. They employed their locally established LET simulation environments and procedures to determine the corresponding LET distributions. Dose distributions Treatment plans from six institutions fulfilled all clinical goals and were eligible for common analysis. Harmonizing the reported LET among PT centers is feasible and allows for consistent multi-centric analysis and reporting of tumor control and toxicity in view of a variable RBE. It may serve as basis for harmonized variable RBE dose prescription in PT.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Clinical data suggest that the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) in proton therapy (PT) varies with linear energy transfer (LET). However, LET calculations are neither standardized nor available in clinical routine. Here, the status of LET calculations among European PT institutions and their comparability are assessed.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
METHODS
Eight European PT institutions used suitable treatment planning systems with their center-specific beam model to create treatment plans in a water phantom covering different field arrangements and fulfilling commonly agreed dose objectives. They employed their locally established LET simulation environments and procedures to determine the corresponding LET distributions. Dose distributions
RESULTS
RESULTS
Treatment plans from six institutions fulfilled all clinical goals and were eligible for common analysis.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Harmonizing the reported LET among PT centers is feasible and allows for consistent multi-centric analysis and reporting of tumor control and toxicity in view of a variable RBE. It may serve as basis for harmonized variable RBE dose prescription in PT.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34686122
doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2021.1992007
doi:
Substances chimiques
Protons
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM