Deep-learning-based synthesis of post-contrast T1-weighted MRI for tumour response assessment in neuro-oncology: a multicentre, retrospective cohort study.


Journal

The Lancet. Digital health
ISSN: 2589-7500
Titre abrégé: Lancet Digit Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101751302

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
12 2021
Historique:
received: 28 04 2021
revised: 14 07 2021
accepted: 10 08 2021
pubmed: 25 10 2021
medline: 1 1 2022
entrez: 24 10 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) are widely used to enhance tissue contrast during MRI scans and play a crucial role in the management of patients with cancer. However, studies have shown gadolinium deposition in the brain after repeated GBCA administration with yet unknown clinical significance. We aimed to assess the feasibility and diagnostic value of synthetic post-contrast T1-weighted MRI generated from pre-contrast MRI sequences through deep convolutional neural networks (dCNN) for tumour response assessment in neuro-oncology. In this multicentre, retrospective cohort study, we used MRI examinations to train and validate a dCNN for synthesising post-contrast T1-weighted sequences from pre-contrast T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery sequences. We used MRI scans with availability of these sequences from 775 patients with glioblastoma treated at Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany (775 MRI examinations); 260 patients who participated in the phase 2 CORE trial (1083 MRI examinations, 59 institutions); and 505 patients who participated in the phase 3 CENTRIC trial (3147 MRI examinations, 149 institutions). Separate training runs to rank the importance of individual sequences and (for a subset) diffusion-weighted imaging were conducted. Independent testing was performed on MRI data from the phase 2 and phase 3 EORTC-26101 trial (521 patients, 1924 MRI examinations, 32 institutions). The similarity between synthetic and true contrast enhancement on post-contrast T1-weighted MRI was quantified using the structural similarity index measure (SSIM). Automated tumour segmentation and volumetric tumour response assessment based on synthetic versus true post-contrast T1-weighted sequences was performed in the EORTC-26101 trial and agreement was assessed with Kaplan-Meier plots. The median SSIM score for predicting contrast enhancement on synthetic post-contrast T1-weighted sequences in the EORTC-26101 test set was 0·818 (95% CI 0·817-0·820). Segmentation of the contrast-enhancing tumour from synthetic post-contrast T1-weighted sequences yielded a median tumour volume of 6·31 cm Generating synthetic post-contrast T1-weighted MRI from pre-contrast MRI using dCNN is feasible and quantification of the contrast-enhancing tumour burden from synthetic post-contrast T1-weighted MRI allows assessment of the patient's response to treatment with no significant difference by comparison with true post-contrast T1-weighted sequences with administration of GBCAs. This finding could guide the application of dCNN in radiology to potentially reduce the necessity of GBCA administration. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) are widely used to enhance tissue contrast during MRI scans and play a crucial role in the management of patients with cancer. However, studies have shown gadolinium deposition in the brain after repeated GBCA administration with yet unknown clinical significance. We aimed to assess the feasibility and diagnostic value of synthetic post-contrast T1-weighted MRI generated from pre-contrast MRI sequences through deep convolutional neural networks (dCNN) for tumour response assessment in neuro-oncology.
METHODS
In this multicentre, retrospective cohort study, we used MRI examinations to train and validate a dCNN for synthesising post-contrast T1-weighted sequences from pre-contrast T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery sequences. We used MRI scans with availability of these sequences from 775 patients with glioblastoma treated at Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany (775 MRI examinations); 260 patients who participated in the phase 2 CORE trial (1083 MRI examinations, 59 institutions); and 505 patients who participated in the phase 3 CENTRIC trial (3147 MRI examinations, 149 institutions). Separate training runs to rank the importance of individual sequences and (for a subset) diffusion-weighted imaging were conducted. Independent testing was performed on MRI data from the phase 2 and phase 3 EORTC-26101 trial (521 patients, 1924 MRI examinations, 32 institutions). The similarity between synthetic and true contrast enhancement on post-contrast T1-weighted MRI was quantified using the structural similarity index measure (SSIM). Automated tumour segmentation and volumetric tumour response assessment based on synthetic versus true post-contrast T1-weighted sequences was performed in the EORTC-26101 trial and agreement was assessed with Kaplan-Meier plots.
FINDINGS
The median SSIM score for predicting contrast enhancement on synthetic post-contrast T1-weighted sequences in the EORTC-26101 test set was 0·818 (95% CI 0·817-0·820). Segmentation of the contrast-enhancing tumour from synthetic post-contrast T1-weighted sequences yielded a median tumour volume of 6·31 cm
INTERPRETATION
Generating synthetic post-contrast T1-weighted MRI from pre-contrast MRI using dCNN is feasible and quantification of the contrast-enhancing tumour burden from synthetic post-contrast T1-weighted MRI allows assessment of the patient's response to treatment with no significant difference by comparison with true post-contrast T1-weighted sequences with administration of GBCAs. This finding could guide the application of dCNN in radiology to potentially reduce the necessity of GBCA administration.
FUNDING
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34688602
pii: S2589-7500(21)00205-3
doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(21)00205-3
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Contrast Media 0
Gadolinium AU0V1LM3JT

Types de publication

Clinical Trial, Phase II Clinical Trial, Phase III Journal Article Multicenter Study Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e784-e794

Commentaires et corrections

Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of interests SH reports grants from the German Research Council and Dietmar-Hopp Foundation, outside of the submitted work. JD reports grants from ViewRay, the Clinical Research Institute, Accuray, RaySearch Laboratories, Vision RT, Merck, Astellas Pharma, AstraZeneca, Siemens Healthcare, Solution Akademie, Egomed, Quintiles, Pharmaceutical Research Association, Boehringer Ingelheim, PTW-Freiburg, and Nanobiotix, outside of the submitted work. MP reports non-financial support from Pfizer, and grants and personal fees from Bayer, outside of the submitted work. MP also has a licensed patent for IDH1 vaccines, a patent H3 vaccine pending, and a patent AHR inhibitor with royalties paid to Bayer. AI reports grants and travel funding from Carthera; research grants from Transgene, Sanofi, Air Liquide, and Nutritheragene; travel funding from Leo Pharma; and is on the advisory board for Novocure and Leo Pharma, outside the submitted work. MjvdB reports personal fees from Roche, Cellgene, Bristol Myers Squibb, Agios, Merck Sharpe & Dohme, and Boehringer Ingelheim; and grants and personal fees from AbbVie, outside of the submitted work. BN is on the scientific advisory board for Karyopharm and BTG Pharmaceuticals and is on the data safety and monitoring board for the University of Pennsylvania (Philadelphia, PA, USA), outside of the submitted work. J-CT reports personal fees from BrainLab and carThera, outside of the submitted work. WW reports grants from Apogenix, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Pfizer; grants and personal fees from Merck Sharp and Dohme and Roche; and personal fees from Bristol Myers Squibb and Celldex, outside of the submitted work. MB reports personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Merck, Bayer, Teva, B Braun, Springer, and Vascular Dynamics; grants and personal fees from Novartis, Codman, and Guerbet; and grants from Siemens, Hopp Foundation, the German Research Council, the EU, Stryker, and Medtronic, outside of the submitted work. All other authors declare no competing interests.

Auteurs

Chandrakanth Jayachandran Preetha (C)

Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.

Hagen Meredig (H)

Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.

Gianluca Brugnara (G)

Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.

Mustafa A Mahmutoglu (MA)

Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.

Martha Foltyn (M)

Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.

Fabian Isensee (F)

Medical Image Computing, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.

Tobias Kessler (T)

Neurology Clinic, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Neurooncology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.

Irada Pflüger (I)

Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.

Marianne Schell (M)

Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.

Ulf Neuberger (U)

Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.

Jens Petersen (J)

Medical Image Computing, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.

Antje Wick (A)

Neurology Clinic, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.

Sabine Heiland (S)

Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.

Jürgen Debus (J)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Heidelberg, Germany.

Michael Platten (M)

Clinical Cooperation Unit Neuroimmunology and Brain Tumor Immunology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Neurology, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.

Ahmed Idbaih (A)

Sorbonne Université, Inserm, Institut du Cerveau, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpitaux Universitaires La Pitié Salpêtrière-Charles Foix, Service de Neurologie 2-Mazarin, Paris, France.

Alba A Brandes (AA)

Department of Medical Oncology, Azienda USL of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

Frank Winkler (F)

Neurology Clinic, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Neurooncology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.

Martin J van den Bent (MJ)

Brain Tumor Center, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands.

Burt Nabors (B)

Department of Neurology and O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, Division of Neuro-Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.

Roger Stupp (R)

Malnati Brain Tumor Institute of the Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Neurological Surgery and Department of Neurology, Northwestern Medicine and Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.

Klaus H Maier-Hein (KH)

Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Medical Image Computing, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.

Thierry Gorlia (T)

European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium.

Jörg-Christian Tonn (JC)

Department of Neurosurgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.

Michael Weller (M)

Department of Neurology, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Wolfgang Wick (W)

Neurology Clinic, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; Clinical Cooperation Unit Neurooncology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany.

Martin Bendszus (M)

Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.

Philipp Vollmuth (P)

Department of Neuroradiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany. Electronic address: philipp.vollmuth@med.uni-heidelberg.de.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH