Germline polymorphisms in genes maintaining the replication fork predict the efficacy of oxaliplatin and irinotecan in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Aged
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
/ administration & dosage
Bevacizumab
/ administration & dosage
Biomarkers, Tumor
/ genetics
Camptothecin
/ administration & dosage
Cell Cycle Proteins
/ genetics
Colonic Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
DNA Replication
DNA-Binding Proteins
/ genetics
Female
Fluorouracil
/ administration & dosage
Germ-Line Mutation
Humans
Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins
/ genetics
Leucovorin
/ administration & dosage
Male
Neoplasm Metastasis
Organoplatinum Compounds
/ administration & dosage
Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide
Survival Rate
Journal
British journal of cancer
ISSN: 1532-1827
Titre abrégé: Br J Cancer
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0370635
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2022
01 2022
Historique:
received:
28
07
2021
accepted:
06
10
2021
revised:
27
09
2021
pubmed:
25
10
2021
medline:
23
2
2022
entrez:
24
10
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The TIMELESS-TIPIN complex protects the replication fork from replication stress induced by chemotherapeutic drugs. We hypothesised genetic polymorphisms of the TIMELESS-TIPIN complex may affect the response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) of cytotoxic drugs in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We analysed data from the MAVERICC trial, which compared FOLFOX/bevacizumab and FOLFIRI/bevacizumab in untreated patients with mCRC. Genomic DNA extracted from blood samples was genotyped using an OncoArray. Eight functional single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in TIMELESS and TIPIN were tested for associations with clinical outcomes. In total, 324 patients were included (FOLFOX/bevacizumab arm, n = 161; FOLFIRI/bevacizumab arm, n = 163). In the FOLFOX/bevacizumab arm, no SNPs displayed confirmed associations with survival outcomes. In the FOLFIRI/bevacizumab arm, TIMELESS rs2291739 was significantly associated with OS in multivariate analysis (G/G vs. any A allele, hazard ratio = 3.06, 95% confidence interval = 1.49-6.25, p = 0.004). TIMELESS rs2291739 displayed significant interactions with treatment regarding both PFS and OS. TIMELESS rs2291739 might have different effects on therapeutic efficacy between oxaliplatin- and irinotecan-based chemotherapies. Upon further validation, our findings may be useful for personalised approaches in the first-line treatment of mCRC.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The TIMELESS-TIPIN complex protects the replication fork from replication stress induced by chemotherapeutic drugs. We hypothesised genetic polymorphisms of the TIMELESS-TIPIN complex may affect the response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) of cytotoxic drugs in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).
METHODS
We analysed data from the MAVERICC trial, which compared FOLFOX/bevacizumab and FOLFIRI/bevacizumab in untreated patients with mCRC. Genomic DNA extracted from blood samples was genotyped using an OncoArray. Eight functional single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in TIMELESS and TIPIN were tested for associations with clinical outcomes.
RESULTS
In total, 324 patients were included (FOLFOX/bevacizumab arm, n = 161; FOLFIRI/bevacizumab arm, n = 163). In the FOLFOX/bevacizumab arm, no SNPs displayed confirmed associations with survival outcomes. In the FOLFIRI/bevacizumab arm, TIMELESS rs2291739 was significantly associated with OS in multivariate analysis (G/G vs. any A allele, hazard ratio = 3.06, 95% confidence interval = 1.49-6.25, p = 0.004). TIMELESS rs2291739 displayed significant interactions with treatment regarding both PFS and OS.
CONCLUSIONS
TIMELESS rs2291739 might have different effects on therapeutic efficacy between oxaliplatin- and irinotecan-based chemotherapies. Upon further validation, our findings may be useful for personalised approaches in the first-line treatment of mCRC.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34689170
doi: 10.1038/s41416-021-01592-7
pii: 10.1038/s41416-021-01592-7
pmc: PMC8727586
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biomarkers, Tumor
0
Cell Cycle Proteins
0
DNA-Binding Proteins
0
Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins
0
Organoplatinum Compounds
0
TIMELESS protein, human
0
Tipin protein, human
0
Bevacizumab
2S9ZZM9Q9V
Leucovorin
Q573I9DVLP
Fluorouracil
U3P01618RT
Camptothecin
XT3Z54Z28A
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase II
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
72-78Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.
Références
Negrini S, Gorgoulis VG, Halazonetis TD. Genomic instability-an evolving hallmark of cancer. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2010;11:220–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm2858.
doi: 10.1038/nrm2858.
pubmed: 20177397
pmcid: 20177397
Macheret M, Halazonetis TD. DNA replication stress as a hallmark of cancer. Annu Rev Pathol. 2015;10:425–48. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-pathol-012414-040424.
doi: 10.1146/annurev-pathol-012414-040424.
pubmed: 25621662
Berti M, Cortez D, Lopes M. The plasticity of DNA replication forks in response to clinically relevant genotoxic stress. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2020;21:633–51. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41580-020-0257-5.
doi: 10.1038/s41580-020-0257-5.
pubmed: 32612242
Di Micco R, Fumagalli M, Cicalese A, Piccinin S, Gasparini P, Luise C, et al. Oncogene-induced senescence is a DNA damage response triggered by DNA hyper-replication. Nature. 2006;444:638–42. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05327.
doi: 10.1038/nature05327.
pubmed: 17136094
Bartkova J, Horejsi Z, Koed K, Kramer A, Tort F, Zieger K, et al. DNA damage response as a candidate anti-cancer barrier in early human tumorigenesis. Nature. 2005;434:864–70. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03482.
doi: 10.1038/nature03482.
pubmed: 15829956
Lecona E, Fernandez-Capetillo O. Replication stress and cancer: it takes two to tango. Exp cell Res. 2014;329:26–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yexcr.2014.09.019.
doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2014.09.019.
pubmed: 25257608
pmcid: 4878650
Bartek J, Mistrik M, Bartkova J. Thresholds of replication stress signaling in cancer development and treatment. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2012;19:5–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.2220.
doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2220.
pubmed: 22218289
Cleary JM, Aguirre AJ, Shapiro GI, D’Andrea AD. Biomarker-guided development of DNA repair inhibitors. Mol Cell. 2020;78:1070–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2020.04.035.
doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2020.04.035.
pubmed: 32459988
pmcid: 7316088
Mateo J, Lord CJ, Serra V, Tutt A, Balmana J, Castroviejo-Bermejo M, et al. A decade of clinical development of PARP inhibitors in perspective. Ann Oncol. 2019;30:1437–47. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdz192.
doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdz192.
pubmed: 31218365
pmcid: 31218365
Leman AR, Noguchi E. Local and global functions of Timeless and Tipin in replication fork protection. Cell cycle. 2012;11:3945–55. https://doi.org/10.4161/cc.21989.
doi: 10.4161/cc.21989.
pubmed: 22987152
pmcid: 3507490
Kemp MG, Akan Z, Yilmaz S, Grillo M, Smith-Roe SL, Kang TH, et al. Tipin-replication protein A interaction mediates Chk1 phosphorylation by ATR in response to genotoxic stress. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:16562–71. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M110.110304.
doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.110304.
pubmed: 20233725
pmcid: 2878033
Cho WH, Kang YH, An YY, Tappin I, Hurwitz J, Lee JK. Human Tim-Tipin complex affects the biochemical properties of the replicative DNA helicase and DNA polymerases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:2523–7. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1222494110.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1222494110.
pubmed: 23359676
pmcid: 3574903
Byun TS, Pacek M, Yee MC, Walter JC, Cimprich KA. Functional uncoupling of MCM helicase and DNA polymerase activities activates the ATR-dependent checkpoint. Genes Dev. 2005;19:1040–52. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.1301205.
doi: 10.1101/gad.1301205.
pubmed: 15833913
pmcid: 1091739
Errico A, Costanzo V. Mechanisms of replication fork protection: a safeguard for genome stability. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 2012;47:222–35. https://doi.org/10.3109/10409238.2012.655374.
doi: 10.3109/10409238.2012.655374.
pubmed: 22324461
Mazzoccoli G, Panza A, Valvano MR, Palumbo O, Carella M, Pazienza V, et al. Clock gene expression levels and relationship with clinical and pathological features in colorectal cancer patients. Chronobiol Int. 2011;28:841–51. https://doi.org/10.3109/07420528.2011.615182.
doi: 10.3109/07420528.2011.615182.
pubmed: 22080729
Pasero P, Tourriere H. Overexpression of the Fork Protection Complex: a strategy to tolerate oncogene-induced replication stress in cancer cells. Mol Cell Oncol. 2019;6:1607455 https://doi.org/10.1080/23723556.2019.1607455.
doi: 10.1080/23723556.2019.1607455.
pubmed: 31211234
pmcid: 6548472
Bianco JN, Bergoglio V, Lin YL, Pillaire MJ, Schmitz AL, Gilhodes J, et al. Overexpression of Claspin and Timeless protects cancer cells from replication stress in a checkpoint-independent manner. Nat Commun. 2019;10:910 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-08886-8.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-08886-8.
pubmed: 30796221
pmcid: 6385232
Perego P, Robert J. Oxaliplatin in the era of personalized medicine: from mechanistic studies to clinical efficacy. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2016;77:5–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-015-2901-x.
doi: 10.1007/s00280-015-2901-x.
pubmed: 26589793
Pommier Y. Topoisomerase I inhibitors: camptothecins and beyond. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006;6:789–802. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc1977.
doi: 10.1038/nrc1977.
pubmed: 16990856
Zellweger R, Dalcher D, Mutreja K, Berti M, Schmid JA, Herrador R, et al. Rad51-mediated replication fork reversal is a global response to genotoxic treatments in human cells. J Cell Biol. 2015;208:563–79. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201406099.
doi: 10.1083/jcb.201406099.
pubmed: 25733714
pmcid: 4347635
Parikh AR, Lee FC, Yau L, Koh H, Knost J, Mitchell EP, et al. MAVERICC, a randomized, biomarker-stratified, phase II study of mFOLFOX6-bevacizumab versus FOLFIRI-bevacizumab as first-line chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2019;25:2988–95. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-1221
doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-1221
pubmed: 30224341
Pommier Y, Barcelo JM, Rao VA, Sordet O, Jobson AG, Thibaut L, et al. Repair Topoisomerase I-Mediated DNA Damage. Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol.2006;81:179–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0079-6603(06)81005-6 .
doi: 10.1016/s0079-6603(06)81005-6
pubmed: 16891172
pmcid: 2576451
Park H, Sternglanz R. Identification and characterization of the genes for two topoisomerase I-interacting proteins from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast. 1999;15:35–41. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0061(19990115)15:1<35::AID-YEA340>3.0.CO;2-R.
doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0061(19990115)15:1<35::AID-YEA340>3.0.CO;2-R
pubmed: 10028183
Hosono Y, Abe T, Higuchi M, Kajii K, Sakuraba S, Tada S, et al. Tipin functions in the protection against topoisomerase I inhibitor. J Biol Chem. 2014;289:11374–84. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M113.531707.
doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.531707.
pubmed: 24573676
pmcid: 4036274
McHugh PJ, Spanswick VJ, Hartley JA. Repair of DNA interstrand crosslinks: molecular mechanisms and clinical relevance. Lancet Oncol. 2001;2:483–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(01)00454-5.
doi: 10.1016/s1470-2045(01)00454-5.
pubmed: 11905724
Kartalou M, Essigmann JM. Recognition of cisplatin adducts by cellular proteins. Mutat Res. 2001;478:1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0027-5107(01)00142-7
doi: 10.1016/s0027-5107(01)00142-7
pubmed: 11406166
Hashimoto S, Anai H, Hanada K. Mechanisms of interstrand DNA crosslink repair and human disorders. Genes Environ. 2016;38:9 https://doi.org/10.1186/s41021-016-0037-9.
doi: 10.1186/s41021-016-0037-9.
pubmed: 27350828
pmcid: 4918140
Deans AJ, West SC. DNA interstrand crosslink repair and cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2011;11:467–80. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc3088.
doi: 10.1038/nrc3088.
pubmed: 21701511
pmcid: 3560328
Ben-Yehoyada M, Wang LC, Kozekov ID, Rizzo CJ, Gottesman ME, Gautier J. Checkpoint signaling from a single DNA interstrand crosslink. Mol Cell. 2009;35:704–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2009.08.014.
doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.08.014.
pubmed: 19748363
pmcid: 2756577