Presentation, Management, and In-Hospital Outcomes of Patients with Acute Heart Failure in South India by Sex: A Secondary Analysis of a Prospective, Interrupted Time Series Study.
Guideline-directed medical therapy
Heart failure
Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction
India
Sex-specific differences
Journal
Global heart
ISSN: 2211-8179
Titre abrégé: Glob Heart
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101584391
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
31
03
2021
accepted:
25
08
2021
entrez:
25
10
2021
pubmed:
26
10
2021
medline:
18
11
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Sex differences in presentation, management, and outcomes of heart failure (HF) have been observed, but it is uncertain whether these differences exist in South India. We describe sex differences in presentation, management, and in-hospital outcomes in patients hospitalized with HF in South India and explore sex-based differences in the effect of the quality improvement intervention in a secondary analysis of a prospective, interrupted time series study. The Heart Failure Quality Improvement in Kerala (HF QUIK) study evaluated the effect of a quality improvement toolkit on process of care measures and clinical outcomes in patients hospitalized with HF in eight hospitals in Kerala using an interrupted time series design from February 2018 to August 2018. The primary outcome was guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) at hospital discharge for patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). We performed sex-stratified analyses using mixed effect logistic regression models. Among 1,400 patients, 536 (38.3%) were female. Female patients were older (69.6 vs. 65 years, p < 0.001), were less likely to have an ischemic etiology of HF (control period: 78.2% vs. 87.5%; intervention period: 83.6% vs. 91.5%; p < 0.05 for both) and were less likely to undergo coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention. The quality improvement intervention had similar effects on the odds of GDMT at discharge in females with HFrEF (adjusted OR 1.79, 95% CI 0.92, 3.47) and males with HFrEF (adjusted OR 1.68, 95% CI 1.07, 2.64, p We observed sex-specific differences in presentation and procedural management of patients with HF but no differences in the effect of the quality improvement intervention on discharge GDMT rates. Both male and female patients with HFrEF remained undertreated in the study intervention period, demonstrating the need for implementation strategies to close the HFrEF treatment gap in South India.
Sections du résumé
Background
Sex differences in presentation, management, and outcomes of heart failure (HF) have been observed, but it is uncertain whether these differences exist in South India.
Objective
We describe sex differences in presentation, management, and in-hospital outcomes in patients hospitalized with HF in South India and explore sex-based differences in the effect of the quality improvement intervention in a secondary analysis of a prospective, interrupted time series study.
Methods
The Heart Failure Quality Improvement in Kerala (HF QUIK) study evaluated the effect of a quality improvement toolkit on process of care measures and clinical outcomes in patients hospitalized with HF in eight hospitals in Kerala using an interrupted time series design from February 2018 to August 2018. The primary outcome was guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) at hospital discharge for patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). We performed sex-stratified analyses using mixed effect logistic regression models.
Results
Among 1,400 patients, 536 (38.3%) were female. Female patients were older (69.6 vs. 65 years, p < 0.001), were less likely to have an ischemic etiology of HF (control period: 78.2% vs. 87.5%; intervention period: 83.6% vs. 91.5%; p < 0.05 for both) and were less likely to undergo coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention. The quality improvement intervention had similar effects on the odds of GDMT at discharge in females with HFrEF (adjusted OR 1.79, 95% CI 0.92, 3.47) and males with HFrEF (adjusted OR 1.68, 95% CI 1.07, 2.64, p
Conclusions
We observed sex-specific differences in presentation and procedural management of patients with HF but no differences in the effect of the quality improvement intervention on discharge GDMT rates. Both male and female patients with HFrEF remained undertreated in the study intervention period, demonstrating the need for implementation strategies to close the HFrEF treatment gap in South India.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34692388
doi: 10.5334/gh.1043
pmc: PMC8485866
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
63Subventions
Organisme : FIC NIH HHS
ID : D43 TW010543
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright: © 2021 The Author(s).
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
In the past three years, MDH received funding from the World Heart Federation to serve as its senior program advisor for the Emerging Leaders program, which has been supported by Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Bupa, and AstraZeneca. MDH also received support from the American Heart Association, Verily, and AstraZeneca and American Medical Association for work unrelated to this research. The George Institute for Global Health’s wholly owned enterprise, George Health Enterprises, has received investment funds to develop fixed-dose combination products containing aspirin, statin and blood pressure lowering drugs. MDH and AA plan to submit patents for heart failure polypills.
Références
Lancet. 2018 Nov 10;392(10159):1736-1788
pubmed: 30496103
Lancet Glob Health. 2017 Jul;5(7):e665-e672
pubmed: 28476564
Lancet Glob Health. 2018 Sep;6(9):e1008-e1018
pubmed: 30103979
Circulation. 2015 Oct 27;132(17):1667-78
pubmed: 26503749
JAMA Cardiol. 2020 Jul 1;5(7):757-764
pubmed: 32319999
Eur Heart J. 2016 Jan 1;37(1):24-34
pubmed: 26530104
Eur J Heart Fail. 2016 Aug;18(8):891-975
pubmed: 27207191
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 27;16(1):e0245659
pubmed: 33503044
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Feb;10(5):e018574
pubmed: 33619973
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2021 Sep;30(9):1253-1258
pubmed: 33667122
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Jun;175(6):996-1004
pubmed: 25895156
Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Mar;8(3):e411-e422
pubmed: 32087174
PLoS One. 2013 Apr 24;8(4):e62061
pubmed: 23637963
JAMA. 2018 Feb 13;319(6):567-578
pubmed: 29450524
Eur Heart J. 2019 Dec 14;40(47):3859-3868c
pubmed: 31800034
Int J Cardiol. 2021 Mar 1;326:139-143
pubmed: 33049297
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2015 Jul;8(4):421-7
pubmed: 26175533
Indian Heart J. 2019 May - Jun;71(3):235-241
pubmed: 31543196
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Jul 3;72(1):79-95
pubmed: 29957235
J Card Fail. 2018 Dec;24(12):842-848
pubmed: 29885494
JAMA. 2020 Dec 8;324(22):2259-2260
pubmed: 33211084
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Jan 8;73(1):29-40
pubmed: 30621948
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Apr 1;63(12):1123-1133
pubmed: 24491689
Eur J Heart Fail. 2015 Aug;17(8):794-800
pubmed: 26011246
Natl Med J India. 2010 Sep-Oct;23(5):283-8
pubmed: 21250584
JACC Heart Fail. 2019 Jun;7(6):505-515
pubmed: 31146874
Int J Cardiol. 2021 Apr 15;329:123-129
pubmed: 33358838
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2021 Dec 29;28(15):1682-1690
pubmed: 33571994
Heart. 2019 Mar;105(6):431-438
pubmed: 30700515
Am Heart J. 2017 Jul;189:193-199
pubmed: 28625377
Glob Heart. 2015 Dec;10(4):273-80
pubmed: 26410401
J Biomed Inform. 2019 Jul;95:103208
pubmed: 31078660
Lancet. 2019 Oct 5;394(10205):1254-1263
pubmed: 31447116
Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2021 Oct;18(5):284-289
pubmed: 34213729