Contact allergy to haptens in the Swedish baseline series: Results from the Swedish Patch Test Register (2010 to 2017).
Sweden
Swedish baseline series
contact allergy
contact dermatitis
eczema
fragrance
methylchloroisothiazolinone
methylisothiazolinone
nickel
patch test
preservative
Journal
Contact dermatitis
ISSN: 1600-0536
Titre abrégé: Contact Dermatitis
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7604950
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2022
Mar 2022
Historique:
revised:
20
10
2021
received:
13
07
2021
accepted:
21
10
2021
pubmed:
28
10
2021
medline:
3
3
2022
entrez:
27
10
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Allergic contact dermatitis has considerable public health impact and causative haptens vary over time. To report the prevalence of contact allergy to allergens in the Swedish baseline series 2010 to 2017, as registered in the Swedish Patch Test Register. Results and demographic information for patients tested with the Swedish baseline series in 2010 to 2017 were analysed. Data for 21 663 individuals (females 69%) were included. Females had significantly more positive patch tests (54% vs 40%). The reaction prevalence rates were highest for nickel sulfate (20.7%), fragrance mix I (7.1%), Myroxylon pereirae (6.9%), potassium dichromate (6.9%), cobalt chloride (6.8%), methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone (MCI/MI; 6.4%), MI (3.7%), colophonium (3.5%), fragrance mix II (3.2%), and formaldehyde (3.2%). Myroxylon pereirae reaction prevalence increased from 5% in 2010 to 9% in 2017 and that for methyldibromo glutaronitrile from 3.1% to 4.6%. MCI/MI and MI reactions decreased in prevalence after 2014. Nickel reaction prevalence decreased among females aged 10 to 19 years. Nickel remains the most common sensitizing agent, with reaction prevalence decreasing among females younger than 20 years. The changes in MCI/MI and MI reaction prevalence mirrored those in Europe. The register can reveal changes in contact allergy prevalence over time among patients patch tested in Sweden.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Allergic contact dermatitis has considerable public health impact and causative haptens vary over time.
OBJECTIVES
OBJECTIVE
To report the prevalence of contact allergy to allergens in the Swedish baseline series 2010 to 2017, as registered in the Swedish Patch Test Register.
METHODS
METHODS
Results and demographic information for patients tested with the Swedish baseline series in 2010 to 2017 were analysed.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Data for 21 663 individuals (females 69%) were included. Females had significantly more positive patch tests (54% vs 40%). The reaction prevalence rates were highest for nickel sulfate (20.7%), fragrance mix I (7.1%), Myroxylon pereirae (6.9%), potassium dichromate (6.9%), cobalt chloride (6.8%), methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone (MCI/MI; 6.4%), MI (3.7%), colophonium (3.5%), fragrance mix II (3.2%), and formaldehyde (3.2%). Myroxylon pereirae reaction prevalence increased from 5% in 2010 to 9% in 2017 and that for methyldibromo glutaronitrile from 3.1% to 4.6%. MCI/MI and MI reactions decreased in prevalence after 2014. Nickel reaction prevalence decreased among females aged 10 to 19 years.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Nickel remains the most common sensitizing agent, with reaction prevalence decreasing among females younger than 20 years. The changes in MCI/MI and MI reaction prevalence mirrored those in Europe. The register can reveal changes in contact allergy prevalence over time among patients patch tested in Sweden.
Substances chimiques
Allergens
0
Preservatives, Pharmaceutical
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
175-188Subventions
Organisme : Hudfonden
Organisme : Department of Dermatology, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro County Council
Informations de copyright
© 2021 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Diepgen TL, Ofenloch RF, Bruze M, et al. Prevalence of contact allergy in the general population in different European regions. Br J Dermatol. 2016;174(2):319-329. doi:10.1111/bjd.14167
Uter W, Gefeller O, Mahler V, Geier J. Trends and current spectrum of contact allergy in Central Europe: results of the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK) 2007-2018. Br J Dermatol. 2020;183(5):857-865. doi:10.1111/bjd.18946
Dietz JB, Menne T, Meyer HW, et al. Degree of employment, sick leave, and costs following notification of occupational contact dermatitis-A register-based study. Contact Dermatitis. 2021;84(4):224-235. doi:10.1111/cod.13719
Uter W, Werfel T, Lepoittevin JP, White IR. Contact allergy-emerging allergens and public health impact. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(7):2404. doi:10.3390/ijerph17072404.
Thyssen JP, Linneberg A, Menne T, Johansen JD. The epidemiology of contact allergy in the general population-prevalence and main findings. Contact Dermatitis. 2007;57(5):287-299. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0536.2007.01220.x
Diepgen TL, Naldi L, Bruze M, et al. Prevalence of contact allergy to p-phenylenediamine in the European general population. J Invest Dermatol. 2016;136(2):409-415. doi:10.1016/j.jid.2015.10.064
Diepgen TL, Ofenloch R, Bruze M, et al. Prevalence of fragrance contact allergy in the general population of five European countries: a cross-sectional study. Br J Dermatol. 2015;173(6):1411-1419. doi:10.1111/bjd.14151
Schuttelaar MLA, Ofenloch RF, Bruze M, et al. Prevalence of contact allergy to metals in the European general population with a focus on nickel and piercings: the EDEN Fragrance Study. Contact Dermatitis. 2018;79(1):1-9. doi:10.1111/cod.12983
Thyssen JP, Uter W, Schnuch A, Linneberg A, Johansen JD. 10-year prevalence of contact allergy in the general population in Denmark estimated through the CE-DUR method. Contact Dermatitis. 2007;57(4):265-272. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0536.2007.01218.x
Rosholm Comstedt L, Dahlin J, Bruze M, et al. Prevalence of contact allergy to metals: nickel, palladium, and cobalt in southern Sweden from 1995-2016. Contact Dermatitis. 2020;82(4):218-226. doi:10.1111/cod.13422
Alinaghi F, Zachariae C, Thyssen JP, Johansen JD. Causative exposures and temporal development of cobalt allergy in Denmark between 2002 and 2017. Contact Dermatitis. 2019;81(4):242-248. doi:10.1111/cod.13326
Alinaghi F, Zachariae C, Thyssen JP, Johansen JD. Temporal changes in chromium allergy in Denmark between 2002 and 2017. Contact Dermatitis. 2019;80(3):156-161. doi:10.1111/cod.13181
Uter W, Arnold R, Wilkinson J, et al. A multilingual European patch test software concept: WinAlldat/ESSCA. Contact Dermatitis. 2003;49(5):270-271. doi:10.1111/j.0105-1873.2003.0225n.x
Uter W, Schnuch A, Geier J, Frosch PJ. Epidemiology of contact dermatitis. The information network of departments of dermatology (IVDK) in Germany. Eur J Dermatol. 1998;8(1):36-40.
Uter W, Hegewald J, Aberer W, et al. The European standard series in 9 European countries, 2002/2003 - first results of the European Surveillance System on Contact Allergies. Contact Dermatitis. 2005;53(3):136-145. doi:10.1111/j.0105-1873.2005.00673.x
Horton E, Wilkinson M, Aalto-Korte K, et al. A survey of members of the European Surveillance System on Contact Allergy and the EU project "StanDerm" to identify allergens tested in cosmetic series across Europe. Contact Dermatitis. 2020;82(3):195-200. doi:10.1111/cod.13437
Lindberg M, Edman B, Fischer T, Stenberg B. Time trends in Swedish patch test data from 1992 to 2000. A multi-centre study based on age and gender adjusted results of the Swedish standard series. Contact Dermatitis. 2007;56(4):205-210.
Fall S, Bruze M, Isaksson M, et al. Contact allergy trends in Sweden - a retrospective comparison of patch test data from 1992, 2000, and 2009. Contact Dermatitis. 2015;72(5):297-304. doi:10.1111/cod.12346
Wahlberg JE, Tammela M, Andersson C, et al. Contact allergy to p-Phenylenediamine in Sweden. Follow-up after reversed intervention. Dermatologie im Beruf und Omweldt. 2002;50(2):51-54.
Engfeldt M, Brared-Christensson J, Isaksson M, et al. Swedish experiences from patch testing methylisothiazolinone separately. Acta Derm Venereol. 2015;95(6):717-719. doi:10.2340/00015555-2029
Ryberg K, Brared-Christensson J, Engfeldt M, et al. Patch testing with a textile dye mix in two concentrations - a multicentre study by the Swedish contact dermatitis research group. Acta Derm Venereol. 2015;95(4):427-431. doi:10.2340/00015555-1956
Isaksson M, Inerot A, Liden C, et al. Multicentre patch testing with a resol resin based on phenol and formaldehyde. Contact Dermatitis. 2011;65(1):34-37. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0536.2011.01921.x
Isaksson M, Brared-Christensson J, Engfeldt M, et al. Patch testing with formaldehyde 2.0% in parallel with 1.0% by the Swedish contact dermatitis research group. Acta Derm Venereol. 2014;94(4):408-410. doi:10.2340/00015555-1748
Engfeldt M, Hagvall L, Isaksson M, et al. Patch testing with hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde (HICC) - a multicentre study of the Swedish Contact Dermatitis Research Group. Contact Dermatitis. 2017;76(1):34-39. doi:10.1111/cod.12699
Johansen JD, Aalto-Korte K, Agner T, et al. European Society of Contact Dermatitis guideline for diagnostic patch testing - recommendations on best practice. Contact Dermatitis. 2015;73(4):195-221. doi:10.1111/cod.12432
Fregert S. Manual of Contact Dermatitis. 2nd ed. Copenhagen, Denmark: Munksgaard; 1981:1981.
Uter W, Bauer A, Belloni Fortina A, et al. Patch test results with the European baseline series and additions thereof in the ESSCA network, 2015-2018. Contact Dermatitis. 2021;84(2):109-120. doi:10.1111/cod.13704
Wilkinson M, Goncalo M, Aerts O, et al. The European baseline series and recommended additions: 2019. Contact Dermatitis. 2019;80(1):1-4. doi:10.1111/cod.13155
Bruze M, Conde-Salazar L, Goossens A, Kanerva L, White IR. Thoughts on sensitizers in a standard patch test series. The European Society of Contact Dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis. 1999;41(5):241-250. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0536.1999.tb06154.x
Stenton J, Dahlin J, Antelmi A, et al. Patch testing with a textile dye mix with and without disperse Orange 3. Contact Dermatitis. 2020;83(5):387-390. doi:10.1111/cod.13660
Uter W, Aalto-Korte K, Agner T, et al. The epidemic of methylisothiazolinone contact allergy in Europe: follow-up on changing exposures. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020;34(2):333-339. doi:10.1111/jdv.15875
Lidén C, White IR. Comment on MDBGN/DBDCB, the European baseline series, and EU legislation. Contact Dermatitis. 2021;85(5):607-610. doi:10.1111/cod.13937.
Lindberg M, Edman B, Fischer T, Stenberg B. Time trends in Swedish patch test data from 1992 to 2000. A multi-centre study based on age- and sex-adjusted results of the Swedish standard series. Contact Dermatitis. 2007;56(4):205-210. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0536.2006.01063.x
Isaksson M, Hansson C, Inerot A, et al. Multicentre patch testing with compositae mix by the Swedish Contact Dermatitis Research Group. Acta Derm Venereol. 2011;91(3):295-298. doi:10.2340/00015555-1061
Bruze M. Thoughts on how to improve the quality of multicentre patch test studies. Contact Dermatitis. 2016;74(3):168-174. doi:10.1111/cod.12507
Svedman C, Isaksson M, Bjork J, Mowitz M, Bruze M. 'Calibration' of our patch test reading technique is necessary. Contact Dermatitis. 2012;66(4):180-187. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0536.2011.02044.x
Isaksson M, Hagvall L, Glas B, et al. Suitable test concentration of cobalt and concomitant reactivity to nickel and chromium: a multicentre study from the Swedish Contact Dermatitis Research Group. Contact Dermatitis. 2021;84(3):153-158. doi:10.1111/cod.13710