COVID-19 in health care workers, Australia 2020.

Australia COVID-19 SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus disease 2019 health care workers

Journal

Communicable diseases intelligence (2018)
ISSN: 2209-6051
Titre abrégé: Commun Dis Intell (2018)
Pays: Australia
ID NLM: 101735394

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
28 Oct 2021
Historique:
entrez: 29 10 2021
pubmed: 30 10 2021
medline: 3 11 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Health care workers are at increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection due to potential exposure to patients or staff in health care settings. Australian health care services and health care workers experienced intense pressure to prepare for and respond to SARS-CoV-2 infections. We summarise national data on health care worker infections and associated outbreaks during 2020. We collected aggregated data on infected health care workers and outbreaks in health care facilities from all jurisdictions. Health care workers working solely in residential aged care and outbreaks in residential aged care facilities were excluded. Jurisdictions provided data on the number of health care setting outbreaks, confirmed cases, hospitalisation, source of infection, and health care worker role. We analysed data for two periods that aligned with two distinct peaks in the epidemic relative to 1 June 2020, referred to here as the first wave (23 January - 31 May 2020) and the second wave (1 June - 18 September 2020). Jurisdictions reported a total of 2,163 health care worker infections with SARS-CoV-2 during the surveillance period. Source of acquisition was known for 81.0% of cases (1,667/2,059). The majority of cases in the first wave were acquired overseas, shifting to locally-acquired cases in the second wave. The odds of infection in the second wave compared to the first wave were higher for nurses/midwives (odds ratio, OR: 1.61; 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.32-2.00), lower for medical practitioners (OR: 0.36; 95% CI: 0.28-0.47) and did not differ for 'other' health care workers (OR: 1.07; 95% CI: 0. 87-1.32). The odds of infection in the second wave were higher in a health care setting (OR: 1.76; 95% CI: 1.28-2.41) than in the community. There were 120 outbreaks in health care settings with 1,428 cases, of which 56.7% (809/1,428) were health care workers. The majority (88/120; 73.8%) of outbreaks in health care settings occurred in the second wave of the epidemic, with 90.9% of these (80/88) occurring in Victoria. In the second wave of the epidemic, when there was heightened community transmission, health care workers were more likely to be infected in the workplace. Throughout the epidemic, nurses were more likely to be infected than staff in other roles.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Health care workers are at increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection due to potential exposure to patients or staff in health care settings. Australian health care services and health care workers experienced intense pressure to prepare for and respond to SARS-CoV-2 infections. We summarise national data on health care worker infections and associated outbreaks during 2020.
METHODS METHODS
We collected aggregated data on infected health care workers and outbreaks in health care facilities from all jurisdictions. Health care workers working solely in residential aged care and outbreaks in residential aged care facilities were excluded. Jurisdictions provided data on the number of health care setting outbreaks, confirmed cases, hospitalisation, source of infection, and health care worker role. We analysed data for two periods that aligned with two distinct peaks in the epidemic relative to 1 June 2020, referred to here as the first wave (23 January - 31 May 2020) and the second wave (1 June - 18 September 2020).
RESULTS RESULTS
Jurisdictions reported a total of 2,163 health care worker infections with SARS-CoV-2 during the surveillance period. Source of acquisition was known for 81.0% of cases (1,667/2,059). The majority of cases in the first wave were acquired overseas, shifting to locally-acquired cases in the second wave. The odds of infection in the second wave compared to the first wave were higher for nurses/midwives (odds ratio, OR: 1.61; 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.32-2.00), lower for medical practitioners (OR: 0.36; 95% CI: 0.28-0.47) and did not differ for 'other' health care workers (OR: 1.07; 95% CI: 0. 87-1.32). The odds of infection in the second wave were higher in a health care setting (OR: 1.76; 95% CI: 1.28-2.41) than in the community. There were 120 outbreaks in health care settings with 1,428 cases, of which 56.7% (809/1,428) were health care workers. The majority (88/120; 73.8%) of outbreaks in health care settings occurred in the second wave of the epidemic, with 90.9% of these (80/88) occurring in Victoria.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
In the second wave of the epidemic, when there was heightened community transmission, health care workers were more likely to be infected in the workplace. Throughout the epidemic, nurses were more likely to be infected than staff in other roles.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34711148
doi: 10.33321//cdi.2021.45.57
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© Commonwealth of Australia CC BY-NC-ND.

Auteurs

Anna C Rafferty (AC)

National Incident Response Division, Australian Government Department of Health, Canberra, Australia.

Moira C Hewitt (MC)

National Incident Response Division, Australian Government Department of Health, Canberra, Australia.

Rose Wright (R)

National Incident Response Division, Australian Government Department of Health, Canberra, Australia.

Freya Hogarth (F)

National Incident Response Division, Australian Government Department of Health, Canberra, Australia.
National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Australian National University, Acton, ACT, Australia.

Nick Coatsworth (N)

Office of the Chief Medical Officer, Australian Government Department of Health, Canberra, Australia.
ANU Medical School, Australian National University, Acton, ACT, Australia.

Frances Ampt (F)

Victorian Department of Health and Human Services, Melbourne, Australia.

Sally Dougall (S)

Victorian Department of Health and Human Services, Melbourne, Australia.

Charles Alpren (C)

Victorian Department of Health and Human Services, Melbourne, Australia.

Louise Causer (L)

The Kirby Institute, University of NSW, Sydney, Australia.

Cushla Coffey (C)

Queensland Health, Brisbane, Australia.

Angela Wakefield (A)

Queensland Health, Brisbane, Australia.

Suzy Campbell (S)

Queensland Health, Brisbane, Australia.

Nevada Pingault (N)

Department of Health, Western Australia.

Michelle Harlock (M)

Tasmanian Department of Health, Hobart, Australia.

Kylie J Smith (KJ)

Tasmanian Department of Health, Hobart, Australia.
Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.

Martyn D Kirk (MD)

National Incident Response Division, Australian Government Department of Health, Canberra, Australia.
National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Australian National University, Acton, ACT, Australia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH