Association Between Brain Substructure Dose and Cognitive Outcomes in Children With Medulloblastoma Treated on SJMB03: A Step Toward Substructure-Informed Planning.
Adolescent
Adolescent Behavior
/ radiation effects
Adolescent Development
/ radiation effects
Age Factors
Brain
/ diagnostic imaging
Cerebellar Neoplasms
/ diagnostic imaging
Child
Child Behavior
/ radiation effects
Child Development
/ radiation effects
Child, Preschool
Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic
Cognition
/ radiation effects
Cranial Irradiation
/ adverse effects
Dose Fractionation, Radiation
Female
Humans
Male
Medulloblastoma
/ diagnostic imaging
Memory
/ radiation effects
Neuropsychological Tests
Radiation Dosage
Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted
Retrospective Studies
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Young Adult
Journal
Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology
ISSN: 1527-7755
Titre abrégé: J Clin Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8309333
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 01 2022
01 01 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
30
10
2021
medline:
22
2
2022
entrez:
29
10
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To characterize the association between neurocognitive outcomes (memory and processing speed) and radiation (RT) dose to the hippocampus, corpus callosum (CC), and frontal white matter (WM) in children with medulloblastoma treated on a prospective study, SJMB03. Patients age 3-21 years with medulloblastoma were treated at a single institution on a phase III study. The craniospinal RT dose was 23.4 Gy for average-risk patients and 36-39.6 Gy for high-risk patients. The boost dose was 55.8 Gy to the tumor bed. Patients underwent cognitive testing at baseline and once yearly for 5 years. Performance on tests of memory (associative memory and working memory) and processing speed (composite processing speed and perceptual speed) was analyzed. Mixed-effects models were used to estimate longitudinal trends in neurocognitive outcomes. Reliable change index and logistic regression were used to define clinically meaningful neurocognitive decline and identify variables associated with decline. One hundred and twenty-four patients were eligible for inclusion, with a median neurocognitive follow-up of 5 years. Mean right and left hippocampal doses were significantly associated with decline in associative memory in patients without posterior fossa syndrome (all Increasing RT dose to the CC or frontal WM and hippocampus is associated with worse performance on tests of processing speed and associative memory, respectively. Brain substructure-informed RT planning may mitigate neurocognitive impairment.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34714708
doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.01480
pmc: PMC8683226
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT00085202']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
83-95Références
Neuro Oncol. 2012 Sep;14(9):1185-93
pubmed: 22898373
Neuro Oncol. 2017 Oct 01;19(10):1408-1418
pubmed: 28541578
J Clin Oncol. 2021 Aug 20;39(24):2685-2697
pubmed: 34110925
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Sep 20;36(27):2762-2769
pubmed: 30091946
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Jul 30;110(31):12822-7
pubmed: 23858442
Source Code Biol Med. 2008 Oct 21;3:15
pubmed: 18939983
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2001 Jan;22(1):158-62
pubmed: 11158902
Nat Med. 1998 Nov;4(11):1313-7
pubmed: 9809557
Neuro Oncol. 2014 Aug;16(8):1129-36
pubmed: 24497405
Childs Nerv Syst. 2016 Jul;32(7):1195-203
pubmed: 27142103
Cancer Res. 2009 Feb 1;69(3):1190-8
pubmed: 19155304
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2010 May;11(5):339-50
pubmed: 20354534
Cancer Res. 2003 Jul 15;63(14):4021-7
pubmed: 12874001
Neuro Oncol. 2021 Mar 25;23(3):350-351
pubmed: 33560406
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Aug 20;23(24):5511-9
pubmed: 16110011
Neuro Oncol. 2019 Sep 6;21(9):1175-1183
pubmed: 30977510
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1991 Feb;59(1):12-9
pubmed: 2002127
Brain Pathol. 2017 Jul;27(4):419-436
pubmed: 27411167
J Clin Oncol. 2012 Nov 20;30(33):4134-40
pubmed: 23071220
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2019 Feb 14;5(1):11
pubmed: 30765705
Neuro Oncol. 2012 Sep;14 Suppl 4:iv25-36
pubmed: 23095827
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018 Aug 1;101(5):1234-1242
pubmed: 29908790
Annu Rev Psychol. 2015 Jan 3;66:115-42
pubmed: 25251486
J Clin Oncol. 2013 Oct 1;31(28):3494-500
pubmed: 23980078
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2012 May;27(3):248-61
pubmed: 22382384
J Clin Oncol. 2021 Mar 1;39(7):822-835
pubmed: 33405951
Cell Stem Cell. 2018 Apr 5;22(4):589-599.e5
pubmed: 29625071
J Clin Oncol. 1999 Jul;17(7):2127-36
pubmed: 10561268
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Apr 1;38(10):1019-1029
pubmed: 32058845
Radiat Oncol. 2013 Dec 23;8:293
pubmed: 24365155
Nature. 2018 Mar 22;555(7697):469-474
pubmed: 29539639
Childs Nerv Syst. 2011 Mar;27(3):355-63
pubmed: 21061011
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015 Sep 1;93(1):64-71
pubmed: 26279025
PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e57768
pubmed: 23469234
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014 Nov 1;90(3):554-61
pubmed: 25160611
Neuro Oncol. 2020 Nov 26;22(11):1677-1685
pubmed: 32227185
Ann Neurol. 2007 Nov;62(5):515-20
pubmed: 17786983
Nat Med. 2002 Sep;8(9):955-62
pubmed: 12161748
J Neurosurg. 2006 Dec;105(6 Suppl):444-51
pubmed: 17184075