Retrospective evaluation of the impact of non-oncologic chronic drug therapy on the survival in patients with bladder cancer.
Bladder cancer
Cystectomy
Medication
Survival
Urothelial carcinoma
Journal
International journal of clinical pharmacy
ISSN: 2210-7711
Titre abrégé: Int J Clin Pharm
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101554912
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2022
Apr 2022
Historique:
received:
24
02
2021
accepted:
18
10
2021
pubmed:
2
11
2021
medline:
16
4
2022
entrez:
1
11
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Background Chronic drug therapy may impact recurrence and survival of patients with bladder cancer and thus be of concern regarding drug choice and treatment decisions. Currently, data are conflicting for some drug classes and missing for others. Objective To analyze the impact of common non-oncologic chronic drug intake on survival in patients with bladder cancer and radical cystectomy. Setting. Patients with bladder cancer and radical cystectomy (2004-2018) at the University Hospital Munich. Method Data from an established internal database with patients with bladder cancer and radical cystectomy were included in a retrospective study. Drug therapy at the time of radical cystectomy and survival data were assessed and follow-up performed 3 months after radical cystectomy and yearly until death or present. Impact on survival was analyzed for antihypertensive, antidiabetic, anti-gout, antithrombotic drugs and statins, using the Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test and Cox-regression models. Main outcome measure Recurrence free survival, cancer specific survival and overall survival for users versus non-users of predefined drug classes. Results Medication and survival data were available in 972 patients. Median follow-up time was 22 months (IQR 7-61). In the univariate analysis, a significant negative impact among users on recurrence free survival (n = 93; p = 0.038), cancer specific survival (n = 116; p < 0.001) and overall survival (n = 116; p < 0.001) was found for calcium-channel blockers, whereas angiotensin-receptor-blockers negatively influenced overall survival (n = 96; p = 0.020), but not recurrence free survival (n = 73; p = 0.696) and cancer specific survival (n = 96; p = 0.406). No effect of angiotensin-receptor-blockers and calcium-channel blockers was seen in the multivariate analysis. None of the other studied drugs had an impact on survival. Conclusion There was no impact on bladder cancer recurrence and survival for any of the analyzed drugs. Considering our results and the controverse findings in the literature, there is currently no evidence to withhold indicated drugs or choose specific drug classes among the evaluated non-oncologic chronic drug therapies. Thus, prospective studies are required for further insight. Trail registration This is part of the trial DRKS00017080, registered 11.10.2019.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34724148
doi: 10.1007/s11096-021-01343-x
pii: 10.1007/s11096-021-01343-x
pmc: PMC9007758
doi:
Substances chimiques
Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists
0
Angiotensins
0
Calcium
SY7Q814VUP
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
339-347Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
Can Urol Assoc J. 2018 Jun;12(6):203-210
pubmed: 29485035
Urol Oncol. 2015 Sep;33(9):386.e7-13
pubmed: 26097049
Lancet Oncol. 2012 May;13(5):518-27
pubmed: 22440112
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Mar;94(9):e589
pubmed: 25738480
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2017 Sep;20(3):328-333
pubmed: 28398294
Scand J Urol. 2019 Aug;53(4):185-192
pubmed: 31250699
Joint Bone Spine. 2018 Dec;85(6):747-753
pubmed: 29427783
Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Mar;24(3):823-831
pubmed: 27730369
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Jul;97(30):e11596
pubmed: 30045293
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Nov;19(12):3987-93
pubmed: 22872290
Thromb Haemost. 2004 Apr;91(4):801-5
pubmed: 15045143
Urol Oncol. 2017 Jun;35(6):342-348
pubmed: 28190747
Cancer Med. 2018 Apr;7(4):1070-1080
pubmed: 29476615
J Urol. 2018 Nov;200(5):1014-1021
pubmed: 29857079
J Hypertens. 2017 Jan;35(1):170-177
pubmed: 27906842
Eur J Cancer Prev. 2016 May;25(3):216-23
pubmed: 25830898
J Urol. 2018 Apr;199(4):906-914
pubmed: 29113840
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Dec 1;177(12):1774-1780
pubmed: 29114736
World J Urol. 2016 May;34(5):703-8
pubmed: 26376992
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2013 May;56(5-6):868-77
pubmed: 23703508
BJU Int. 2013 Jul;112(2):E4-12
pubmed: 23795797
Urol Oncol. 2013 Nov;31(8):1689-95
pubmed: 22795502
J Clin Med Res. 2018 Dec;10(12):911-919
pubmed: 30425764
JAMA Oncol. 2018 Jan 01;4(1):63-70
pubmed: 28822996
FEBS Open Bio. 2019 Feb 06;9(3):457-467
pubmed: 30868054
Ups J Med Sci. 2018 Jun;123(2):109-115
pubmed: 29911922
BMC Urol. 2019 Apr 18;19(1):24
pubmed: 30999871
BMC Cancer. 2019 Nov 21;19(1):1133
pubmed: 31752752
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 May 15;71(19):e127-e248
pubmed: 29146535
Biochem Pharmacol. 2018 May;151:96-103
pubmed: 29534876
Eur Urol. 2018 Dec;74(6):784-795
pubmed: 30268659
J Urol. 2015 Nov;194(5):1214-9
pubmed: 26173101
Eur Heart J. 2018 Sep 1;39(33):3021-3104
pubmed: 30165516
J Urol. 2013 Aug;190(2):487-92
pubmed: 23395802
BMC Cancer. 2015 Mar 13;15:120
pubmed: 25877676