Can birth outcome inequality be reduced using targeted caseload midwifery in a deprived diverse inner city population? A retrospective cohort study, London, UK.
health policy
obstetrics
public health
Journal
BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 11 2021
01 11 2021
Historique:
entrez:
2
11
2021
pubmed:
3
11
2021
medline:
15
12
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
(1) To report maternal and newborn outcomes of pregnant women in areas of social deprivation in inner city London. (2) To compare the effect of caseload midwifery with standard care on maternal and newborn outcomes in this cohort of women. Retrospective observational cohort study. Four council wards (electoral districts) in inner city London, where over 90% of residents are in the two most deprived quintiles of the English Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) (2019) and the population is ethnically diverse. All women booked for antenatal care under Guys and St Thomas' National Health Service Foundation Trust after 11 July 2018 (when the Lambeth Early Action Partnership (LEAP*) caseload midwifery team was implemented) until data collection 18 June 2020. This included 523 pregnancies in the LEAP area, of which 230 were allocated to caseload midwifery, and 8430 pregnancies from other areas. To explore if targeted caseload midwifery (known to reduce preterm birth) will improve important measurable outcomes (preterm birth, mode of birth and newborn outcomes). There was a significant reduction in preterm birth rate in women allocated to caseload midwifery, when compared with those who received traditional midwifery care (5.1% vs 11.2%; risk ratio: 0.41; p=0.02; 95% CI 0.18 to 0.86; number needed to treat: 11.9). Caesarean section births were significantly reduced in women allocated to caseload midwifery care, when compared with traditional midwifery care (24.3% vs 38.0%; risk ratio: 0.64: p=0.01; 95% CI 0.47 to 0.90; number needed to treat: 7.4) including emergency caesarean deliveries (15.2% vs 22.5%; risk ratio: 0.59; p=0.03; 95% CI 0.38 to 0.94; number needed to treat: 10) without increase in neonatal unit admission or stillbirth. This study shows that a model of caseload midwifery care implemented in an inner city deprived community improves outcome by significantly reducing preterm birth and birth by caesarean section when compared with traditional care. This data trend suggests that when applied to targeted groups (women in higher IMD quintile and women of diverse ethnicity) that the impact of intervention is greater.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34725078
pii: bmjopen-2021-049991
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049991
pmc: PMC8562498
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e049991Informations de copyright
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Competing interests: None declared.
Références
Econ J (London). 2016 Oct;126(596):F28-F65
pubmed: 28260805
PLoS Med. 2020 Oct 6;17(10):e1003350
pubmed: 33022010
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Nov 14;11:CD012505
pubmed: 30480756
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 28;4:CD004667
pubmed: 27121907
Midwifery. 2017 May;48:1-10
pubmed: 28284877
Dis Markers. 2015;2015:435014
pubmed: 26160993
Pediatrics. 2007 Jul;120(1):70-7
pubmed: 17606563
Lancet. 2013 Nov 23;382(9906):1723-32
pubmed: 24050808
Pediatrics. 2018 Jan;141(1):
pubmed: 29242268
JAMA Pediatr. 2016 Sep 1;170(9):863-70
pubmed: 27428766
Lancet. 2014 Sep 27;384(9949):1226-35
pubmed: 24965818
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2014 Jan-Feb;59(1):82-90
pubmed: 24588880
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2010 May-Jun;55(3):206-15
pubmed: 20434080
SSM Popul Health. 2016 Mar 18;2:182-193
pubmed: 29349139
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2000 Jan-Feb;45(1):4-19
pubmed: 10772731
Midwifery. 2020 May;84:102654
pubmed: 32066030
BJOG. 2015 Nov;122(12):1610-7
pubmed: 25227878
Eur J Health Econ. 2017 Nov;18(8):1041-1046
pubmed: 27909819
BMJ Open. 2016 Oct 8;6(10):e012676
pubmed: 27855105
Eur J Psychol. 2016 Nov 18;12(4):604-621
pubmed: 27872669
Front Public Health. 2018 Dec 07;6:359
pubmed: 30581812
PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e23163
pubmed: 21826237
Int J Obstet Anesth. 2015 May;24(2):161-73
pubmed: 25841640
Lancet. 2018 Oct 13;392(10155):1349-1357
pubmed: 30322585
EClinicalMedicine. 2019 Jun 24;12:43-51
pubmed: 31388662
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Sep;52(3):425-40
pubmed: 19661759
J Perinat Med. 2013 Nov;41(6):631-45
pubmed: 24216160
Obstet Med. 2013 Jun;6(2):52-57
pubmed: 27757157
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Sep 4;2(9):e1911027
pubmed: 31509207
Midwifery. 2015 Apr;31(4):409-17
pubmed: 25661044
Semin Perinatol. 2001 Aug;25(4):204-14
pubmed: 11561908
Reprod Health. 2015 Jun 21;12:57
pubmed: 26093498