Deintensification of Treatment With Sulfonylurea and Insulin After Severe Hypoglycemia Among Older Adults With Diabetes.


Journal

JAMA network open
ISSN: 2574-3805
Titre abrégé: JAMA Netw Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101729235

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 11 2021
Historique:
entrez: 2 11 2021
pubmed: 3 11 2021
medline: 27 1 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Practice guidelines recommend deintensification of hypoglycemic agents among older adults with diabetes who are at high risk of hypoglycemia, yet real-world treatment deintensification practices are not well characterized. To examine the incidence of sulfonylurea and insulin deintensification after a hypoglycemia-associated emergency department (ED) visit or hospitalization among older adults with diabetes and to identify factors associated with deintensification of treatment. This retrospective cohort study included a random sample of 20% of nationwide fee-for-service US Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 years and older with concurrent Medicare parts A, B, and D coverage between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2017. Individuals with diabetes who had at least 1 hypoglycemia-associated ED visit or hospitalization were included. Data were analyzed from August 1, 2020, to August 1, 2021. Baseline medication for the treatment of diabetes (sulfonylurea, insulin, or both). Incidence of treatment deintensification (yes or no) in the 100 days after a severe hypoglycemic episode requiring an ED visit or hospitalization, with treatment deintensification defined as (1) a decrease in sulfonylurea dose, (2) a change from long-acting to short-acting sulfonylurea (glipizide), (3) discontinuation of sulfonylurea, or (4) discontinuation of insulin based on pharmacy dispensing claims. Among 76 278 distinct Medicare beneficiaries who had a hypoglycemia-associated ED visit or hospitalization, the mean (SD) age was 76.6 (7.6) years. Of 106 293 total hypoglycemic episodes requiring hospital attention, 69 084 (65.0%) occurred among women, 26 056 (24.5%) among Black individuals; 4761 (4.5%) among Hispanic individuals; 69 704 (65.6%) among White individuals; and 5772 (5.4%) among individuals of other races and ethnicities (comprising Asian, North American Native, unknown race or ethnicity, and unspecified race or ethnicity). A total of 32 074 episodes (30.2%) occurred among those receiving sulfonylurea only, 60 350 (56.8%) occurred among those receiving insulin only, and 13 869 (13.0%) occurred among those receiving both sulfonylurea and insulin. Treatment deintensification rates were highest among individuals receiving both sulfonylurea and insulin therapies at the time of their hypoglycemic episode (6677 episodes [48.1%]), followed by individuals receiving sulfonylurea only (14 192 episodes [44.2%]) and insulin only (14 495 episodes [24.0%]). Treatment deintensification rates increased between 2007 and 2017 (sulfonylurea only: from 41.4% to 49.7%; P < .001 for trend; insulin only: from 21.3% to 25.9%; P < .001 for trend; sulfonylurea and insulin: from 45.9% to 49.6%; P = .005 for trend). Lower socioeconomic status (as indicated by the receipt of low-income subsidies) was associated with lower odds of deintensification, regardless of baseline hypoglycemic regimen (sulfonylurea only: adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.74 [95% CI, 0.70-0.78]; insulin only: AOR, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.68-0.75]; sulfonylurea and insulin: AOR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.66-0.78]). A number of patient factors were associated with higher odds of treatment deintensification: higher frailty (eg, ≥40% probability of needing assistance with activities of daily living among those receiving sulfonylurea and insulin: AOR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.32-1.71), chronic kidney disease (eg, sulfonylurea and insulin: AOR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.19-1.40), a history of falls (eg, sulfonylurea and insulin: AOR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.09-1.33), and depression (eg, sulfonylurea and insulin: AOR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.02-1.20). In this cohort study, deintensification of sulfonylurea and/or insulin therapy within 100 days after a hypoglycemia-associated ED visit or hospitalization occurred in fewer than 50% of older adults with diabetes; however, these deintensification rates may be increasing over time, and deintensification of insulin was likely underestimated because of challenges in capturing changes to insulin dosing using administrative claims data. These results suggest that greater efforts are needed to identify individuals at high risk of hypoglycemia to encourage appropriate treatment deintensification in accordance with current evidence.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34726745
pii: 2785666
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.32215
pmc: PMC8564578
doi:

Substances chimiques

Hypoglycemic Agents 0
Insulin 0
Sulfonylurea Compounds 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e2132215

Subventions

Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : K08 AG071794
Pays : United States

Références

BMJ. 2010 Jan 08;340:b4909
pubmed: 20061358
Mayo Clin Proc. 2019 Sep;94(9):1731-1742
pubmed: 31422897
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Dec;175(12):1942-9
pubmed: 26502220
Diabetes Care. 2016 Aug;39 Suppl 2:S205-9
pubmed: 27440834
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Jul;174(7):1116-24
pubmed: 24838229
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2015 Jan;24(1):59-66
pubmed: 25335470
Diabetes Care. 2003 Apr;26(4):1040-6
pubmed: 12663570
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jan 3;3(1):e1919099
pubmed: 31922562
BMC Endocr Disord. 2008 Apr 01;8:4
pubmed: 18380903
Int J Surg. 2014 Dec;12(12):1495-9
pubmed: 25046131
Curr Diab Rep. 2018 Jun 21;18(8):53
pubmed: 29931579
Diabetes Care. 2012 Sep;35(9):1897-901
pubmed: 22699297
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Jan;33(1):34-41
pubmed: 28905179
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Mar;175(3):356-62
pubmed: 25581565
Diabetes Care. 2021 Jan;44(Suppl 1):S168-S179
pubmed: 33298423
Diabetes Care. 2020 Nov;43(11):e188-e189
pubmed: 32943439
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019 Jul;21(7):1668-1679
pubmed: 30938038
Diabetes Care. 2015 Aug;38(8):1583-91
pubmed: 26207052
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Apr;68(4):736-745
pubmed: 32065387
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Dec 1;179(12):1633-1641
pubmed: 31545376
N Engl J Med. 2014 Dec 11;371(24):2288-97
pubmed: 25494268

Auteurs

Anastasia-Stefania Alexopoulos (AS)

Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Durham Veterans Affairs Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham, North Carolina.

Anna R Kahkoska (AR)

Department of Nutrition, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill.

Virginia Pate (V)

Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill.

Marie C Bradley (MC)

Division of Epidemiology, Office of Surveillance and Epidemiology, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.

Joshua Niznik (J)

Department of Medicine, Division of Geriatrics and Center for Aging and Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill.
Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill.
Center of Health Equity Research and Promotion, Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Carolyn Thorpe (C)

Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill.
Center of Health Equity Research and Promotion, Veterans Affairs Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Til Stürmer (T)

Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill.

John Buse (J)

Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH