The Utility of Serial Hemoglobin Monitoring in Non-Operative Management of Blunt Splenic Injury.
blunt splenic injury
hemoglobin
non-operative management
surgical quality improvement
trauma acute care
Journal
The American surgeon
ISSN: 1555-9823
Titre abrégé: Am Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0370522
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2022
Apr 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
4
11
2021
medline:
17
3
2022
entrez:
3
11
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (EAST) states there is not enough evidence to recommend a particular frequency of measuring Hgb values for non-operative management (NOM) of blunt splenic injury (BSI). This study was performed to compare the utility of serial Hgb (SHgb) to daily Hgb (DHgb) in this population. We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients with BSI between 2013 and 2019. Demographics, comorbidities, lab values, clinical decisions, and outcomes were gathered through a trauma database. A total of 562 patients arrive in the trauma bay with BSI. In the NOM group, 297 were successful and 37 failed NOM. Of those that failed NOM, 8 (21.6%) changed to OM due to a drop in Hgb. 5 (62.5%) were hypotensive first, 2 (25%) were no longer receiving SHgb, and 1 (12.5%) had a repeat CT scan and was embolized. DHgb patients were not significantly different from SHgb patients in injury severity, length of stay, the largest drop in Hgb, and incidence of failing NOM. Patients taking aspirin were more likely to fall below 7 g/dl at 48 and 72 hours into admission. These results suggest that that trending SHgb may not influence clinical decision-making in NOM of BSI. Besides taking aspirin, risk factors for who would benefit from SHgb were not identified. Patients who received DHgb had similar injuries and outcomes than patients who received SHgb. Prospective studies are needed to evaluate the clinical utility of SHgb compared to DHgb.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (EAST) states there is not enough evidence to recommend a particular frequency of measuring Hgb values for non-operative management (NOM) of blunt splenic injury (BSI). This study was performed to compare the utility of serial Hgb (SHgb) to daily Hgb (DHgb) in this population.
METHODS
METHODS
We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients with BSI between 2013 and 2019. Demographics, comorbidities, lab values, clinical decisions, and outcomes were gathered through a trauma database.
RESULTS
RESULTS
A total of 562 patients arrive in the trauma bay with BSI. In the NOM group, 297 were successful and 37 failed NOM. Of those that failed NOM, 8 (21.6%) changed to OM due to a drop in Hgb. 5 (62.5%) were hypotensive first, 2 (25%) were no longer receiving SHgb, and 1 (12.5%) had a repeat CT scan and was embolized. DHgb patients were not significantly different from SHgb patients in injury severity, length of stay, the largest drop in Hgb, and incidence of failing NOM. Patients taking aspirin were more likely to fall below 7 g/dl at 48 and 72 hours into admission.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
These results suggest that that trending SHgb may not influence clinical decision-making in NOM of BSI. Besides taking aspirin, risk factors for who would benefit from SHgb were not identified. Patients who received DHgb had similar injuries and outcomes than patients who received SHgb. Prospective studies are needed to evaluate the clinical utility of SHgb compared to DHgb.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34730033
doi: 10.1177/00031348211048829
doi:
Substances chimiques
Hemoglobins
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM