Linkage and QTL mapping for tuber shape and specific gravity in a tetraploid mapping population of potato representing the russet market class.
MAPpoly
Potato specific gravity
Potato tuber shape
QTLpoly
Quantitative trait locus/loci (QTL) analysis
Journal
BMC plant biology
ISSN: 1471-2229
Titre abrégé: BMC Plant Biol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100967807
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 Nov 2021
03 Nov 2021
Historique:
received:
21
03
2021
accepted:
12
10
2021
entrez:
4
11
2021
pubmed:
5
11
2021
medline:
28
12
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Tuber shape and specific gravity (dry matter) are important agronomic traits in potato processing and impact production costs, quality, and consistency of the final processed food products such as French fries and potato chips. In this study, linkage and QTL mapping were performed for these two traits to allow for the implementation of marker-assisted selection to facilitate breeding efforts in the russet market class. Two parents, Rio Grande Russet (female) and Premier Russet (male) and their 205 F1 progenies were initially phenotyped for tuber shape and specific gravity in field trials conducted in Idaho and North Carolina in 2010 and 2011, with specific gravity also being measured in Minnesota in 2011. Progenies and parents were previously genotyped using the Illumina SolCAP Infinium 8303 Potato SNP array, with ClusterCall and MAPpoly (R-packages) subsequently used for autotetraploid SNP calling and linkage mapping in this study. The 12 complete linkage groups and phenotypic data were then imported into QTLpoly, an R-package designed for polyploid QTL analyses. Significant QTL for tuber shape were detected on chromosomes 4, 7, and 10, with heritability estimates ranging from 0.09 to 0.36. Significant tuber shape QTL on chromosomes 4 and 7 were specific to Idaho and North Carolina environments, respectively, whereas the QTL on chromosome 10 was significant regardless of growing environment. Single marker analyses identified alleles in the parents associated with QTL on chromosomes 4, 7, and 10 that contributed to significant differences in tuber shape among progenies. Significant QTL were also identified for specific gravity on chromosomes 1 and 5 with heritability ranging from 0.12 to 0.21 and were reflected across environments. Fully automated linkage mapping and QTL analysis were conducted to identify significant QTL for tuber shape and dry matter in a tetraploid mapping population representing the russet market class. The findings are important for the development of molecular markers useful to potato breeders for marker-assisted selection for the long tuber shape and acceptable dry matter required by the potato industry within this important market class.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Tuber shape and specific gravity (dry matter) are important agronomic traits in potato processing and impact production costs, quality, and consistency of the final processed food products such as French fries and potato chips. In this study, linkage and QTL mapping were performed for these two traits to allow for the implementation of marker-assisted selection to facilitate breeding efforts in the russet market class. Two parents, Rio Grande Russet (female) and Premier Russet (male) and their 205 F1 progenies were initially phenotyped for tuber shape and specific gravity in field trials conducted in Idaho and North Carolina in 2010 and 2011, with specific gravity also being measured in Minnesota in 2011. Progenies and parents were previously genotyped using the Illumina SolCAP Infinium 8303 Potato SNP array, with ClusterCall and MAPpoly (R-packages) subsequently used for autotetraploid SNP calling and linkage mapping in this study. The 12 complete linkage groups and phenotypic data were then imported into QTLpoly, an R-package designed for polyploid QTL analyses.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Significant QTL for tuber shape were detected on chromosomes 4, 7, and 10, with heritability estimates ranging from 0.09 to 0.36. Significant tuber shape QTL on chromosomes 4 and 7 were specific to Idaho and North Carolina environments, respectively, whereas the QTL on chromosome 10 was significant regardless of growing environment. Single marker analyses identified alleles in the parents associated with QTL on chromosomes 4, 7, and 10 that contributed to significant differences in tuber shape among progenies. Significant QTL were also identified for specific gravity on chromosomes 1 and 5 with heritability ranging from 0.12 to 0.21 and were reflected across environments.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Fully automated linkage mapping and QTL analysis were conducted to identify significant QTL for tuber shape and dry matter in a tetraploid mapping population representing the russet market class. The findings are important for the development of molecular markers useful to potato breeders for marker-assisted selection for the long tuber shape and acceptable dry matter required by the potato industry within this important market class.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34732129
doi: 10.1186/s12870-021-03265-2
pii: 10.1186/s12870-021-03265-2
pmc: PMC8565078
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
507Subventions
Organisme : National Institute of Food and Agriculture
ID : 2009-85606-05673
Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
G3 (Bethesda). 2020 Jan 7;10(1):281-292
pubmed: 31732504
Genetics. 2019 Aug;212(4):991-1008
pubmed: 31248886
Theor Appl Genet. 2005 Apr;110(6):1068-73
pubmed: 15719211
Theor Appl Genet. 2016 Apr;129(4):767-785
pubmed: 26825382
J Mem Lang. 2013 Apr;68(3):
pubmed: 24403724
Theor Appl Genet. 2014 Oct;127(10):2159-71
pubmed: 25159608
Theor Appl Genet. 2018 Apr;131(4):929-945
pubmed: 29307117
BMC Genet. 2018 Sep 21;19(1):87
pubmed: 30241465
G3 (Bethesda). 2013 Nov 06;3(11):2031-47
pubmed: 24062527
Theor Appl Genet. 2008 Jan;116(2):193-211
pubmed: 17938877
G3 (Bethesda). 2019 Oct 7;9(10):3297-3314
pubmed: 31405891
BMC Bioinformatics. 2008 Oct 02;9:409
pubmed: 18831757
Front Plant Sci. 2018 Jul 03;9:944
pubmed: 30018631
J Hered. 2003 Jul-Aug;94(4):358-9
pubmed: 12920109
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Apr;84(8):2363-7
pubmed: 3470801
J Exp Bot. 2014 Feb;65(2):709-23
pubmed: 24474812
Genetics. 2020 Jul;215(3):579-595
pubmed: 32371382
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 6;13(7):e0199716
pubmed: 29979690
J Appl Genet. 2018 May;59(2):123-132
pubmed: 29492845
Theor Appl Genet. 2008 May;116(8):1167-81
pubmed: 18379755
Theor Appl Genet. 2016 May;129(5):935-43
pubmed: 26849236
Theor Appl Genet. 2017 Apr;130(4):717-726
pubmed: 28070610
Biometrics. 2013 Dec;69(4):883-92
pubmed: 24328714
BMC Genomics. 2011 Jun 09;12:302
pubmed: 21658273
Theor Appl Genet. 2016 Nov;129(11):2117-2132
pubmed: 27502200
Genetics. 1994 May;137(1):303-9
pubmed: 7914504
G3 (Bethesda). 2017 Nov 6;7(11):3587-3595
pubmed: 28903982
G3 (Bethesda). 2015 Sep 14;5(11):2357-64
pubmed: 26374597
Euphytica. 2018;214(7):121
pubmed: 30996395