Cost-effectiveness of custom-made insoles versus usual care in patients with plantar heel pain in primary care: cost-effectiveness analysis of a randomised controlled trial.


Journal

BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 11 2021
Historique:
entrez: 4 11 2021
pubmed: 5 11 2021
medline: 15 12 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of custom-made insoles compared with general practitioner (GP)-led usual care after 26 weeks of follow-up in individuals with plantar heel pain (PHP) from a societal perspective. Cost-effectiveness analysis of a double-blinded randomised controlled trial. General practice in the Netherlands. 116 participants with PHP for at least 2 weeks, aged 18-65 years and presenting to the GP. Participants were randomised to GP-led usual care (n=46) or referral to a podiatrist for treatment with a custom-made insole (n=70). Participant randomised to a sham insole (n=69) were excluded from this analysis. Outcomes comprised pain during rest and activity, and quality of life. Costs included healthcare and lost productivity costs. Statistical uncertainty was estimated using bootstrapping and presented using cost-effectiveness acceptability curves. Participants in the custom-made insole group experienced statistically significant more pain during activity at 26 weeks than participants in the usual care group (overall effect 1.06; 95% CI 0.36 to 1.75). There were no significant differences between groups in other outcomes. Total societal costs in the custom-made insole group were non-significantly higher than in the usual care group (mean difference €376; 95% CI -€1775 to €2038). The intervention with custom-made insoles was dominated by usual care by the GP (ie, more expensive and less effective) for pain during activity and quality of life outcomes. For the outcome pain at rest, the intervention was more expensive and more effective than usual care. However, the maximum probability of cost-effectiveness was only 0.59 at very high ceiling ratios. These findings show that that custom-made insoles are not cost-effective in comparison with GP-led usual care. Clinicians should be reserved in prescribing custom-made insoles for PHP as a primary intervention. NTR5346.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34732484
pii: bmjopen-2021-051866
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051866
pmc: PMC8572391
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e051866

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf and declare: support from ZonMW and the NVvP for the submitted work. SMAB-Z declares: grants from The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMW), other from The Dutch Association of Podiatrists (NVvP), during the conduct of the study; grants from The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development, CZ, European Union, Foreum, Dutch Arthritis Association, personal fees from Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI), personal fees from Pfizer, outside the submitted work.

Références

Stat Med. 2011 Feb 20;30(4):377-99
pubmed: 21225900
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Jan 16;17:31
pubmed: 26772739
Value Health. 2015 Sep;18(6):753-8
pubmed: 26409601
Value Health. 2014 Sep;17(6):707-13
pubmed: 25236994
N Engl J Med. 2004 May 20;350(21):2159-66
pubmed: 15152061
JAMA. 2013 Nov 27;310(20):2191-4
pubmed: 24141714
Br J Sports Med. 2021 Mar;55(5):272-278
pubmed: 32878869
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2004 May-Jun;94(3):229-38
pubmed: 15153583
J Pain. 2018 Aug;19(8):885-896
pubmed: 29597082
Clin Trials. 2007;4(2):154-61
pubmed: 17456514
Br J Gen Pract. 2019 Oct 31;69(688):e801-e808
pubmed: 31636128
Foot Ankle Int. 2004 May;25(5):303-10
pubmed: 15134610
Musculoskeletal Care. 2014 Mar;12(1):1-10
pubmed: 23801649
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2010 May;39(5):227-31
pubmed: 20567740
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2008 Jul-Aug;98(4):283-9
pubmed: 18685048
Med Care. 1996 Mar;34(3):220-33
pubmed: 8628042
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2005 Jul 9;149(28):1574-8
pubmed: 16038162
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Aug;88(8):1775-81
pubmed: 16882901
BMJ. 2000 Dec 2;321(7273):1362-3
pubmed: 11099268
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 9;12(11):e0187477
pubmed: 29121647

Auteurs

Nadine Rasenberg (N)

Department of General Practice, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands n.rasenberg@erasmusmc.nl.

Marienke van Middelkoop (M)

Department of General Practice, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands.

Sita M A Bierma-Zeinstra (SMA)

Department of General Practice, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands.

Mohamed El Alili (M)

Department of Health Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands.

Patrick Bindels (P)

Department of General Practice, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands.

J Bosmans (J)

Department of Health Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH