Plant PhysioSpace: a robust tool to compare stress response across plant species.


Journal

Plant physiology
ISSN: 1532-2548
Titre abrégé: Plant Physiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0401224

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 11 2021
Historique:
received: 09 01 2021
accepted: 12 06 2021
entrez: 4 11 2021
pubmed: 5 11 2021
medline: 26 2 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Generalization of transcriptomics results can be achieved by comparison across experiments. This generalization is based on integration of interrelated transcriptomics studies into a compendium. Such a focus on the bigger picture enables both characterizations of the fate of an organism and distinction between generic and specific responses. Numerous methods for analyzing transcriptomics datasets exist. Yet, most of these methods focus on gene-wise dimension reduction to obtain marker genes and gene sets for, for example, pathway analysis. Relying only on isolated biological modules might result in missing important confounders and relevant contexts. We developed a method called Plant PhysioSpace, which enables researchers to compute experimental conditions across species and platforms without a priori reducing the reference information to specific gene sets. Plant PhysioSpace extracts physiologically relevant signatures from a reference dataset (i.e. a collection of public datasets) by integrating and transforming heterogeneous reference gene expression data into a set of physiology-specific patterns. New experimental data can be mapped to these patterns, resulting in similarity scores between the acquired data and the extracted compendium. Because of its robustness against platform bias and noise, Plant PhysioSpace can function as an inter-species or cross-platform similarity measure. We have demonstrated its success in translating stress responses between different species and platforms, including single-cell technologies. We have also implemented two R packages, one software and one data package, and a Shiny web application to facilitate access to our method and precomputed models.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34734276
pii: 6323366
doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiab325
pmc: PMC8566309
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1795-1811

Informations de copyright

© American Society of Plant Biologists 2021. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Références

Plant Cell. 2019 May;31(5):993-1011
pubmed: 30923229
Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:654120
pubmed: 23509757
Biostatistics. 2003 Apr;4(2):249-64
pubmed: 12925520
Genome Biol. 2016 Nov 25;17(1):239
pubmed: 27887629
Cell. 2017 Nov 30;171(6):1437-1452.e17
pubmed: 29195078
Plant Physiol. 2016 Apr;170(4):2172-86
pubmed: 26869702
Nat Biotechnol. 2014 Apr;32(4):381-386
pubmed: 24658644
Bioinformatics. 2015 Sep 1;31(17):2912-4
pubmed: 25964631
Nucleic Acids Res. 2016 Jan 4;44(D1):D746-52
pubmed: 26481351
Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2015;53:97-119
pubmed: 26070330
Dev Cell. 2019 Mar 25;48(6):840-852.e5
pubmed: 30913408
Bioinformatics. 2014 Apr 1;30(7):923-30
pubmed: 24227677
PLoS One. 2013 Oct 17;8(10):e77627
pubmed: 24147039
Nucleic Acids Res. 2013 Jul;41(Web Server issue):W29-33
pubmed: 23609542
Plant Physiol. 2015 Mar;167(3):1158-85
pubmed: 25596183
Theor Appl Genet. 2016 Aug;129(8):1607-23
pubmed: 27174222
Mol Plant. 2019 May 6;12(5):648-660
pubmed: 31004836
Bioinformatics. 2014 Aug 1;30(15):2114-20
pubmed: 24695404
Genome Biol. 2014;15(12):550
pubmed: 25516281
Nucleic Acids Res. 2006 Jul 1;34(Web Server issue):W645-50
pubmed: 16912992
Nucleic Acids Res. 2015 Apr 20;43(7):e47
pubmed: 25605792
Trends Plant Sci. 2020 Feb;25(2):186-197
pubmed: 31780334
Cell Rep. 2019 May 14;27(7):2241-2247.e4
pubmed: 31091459
Nat Biotechnol. 2018 Jun;36(5):411-420
pubmed: 29608179
Plant Physiol. 2019 Apr;179(4):1444-1456
pubmed: 30718350
BMC Genomics. 2016 May 20;17:380
pubmed: 27207100
Anal Chem. 2011 Jun 15;83(12):4327-41
pubmed: 21612267
Annu Rev Phytopathol. 1998;36:415-37
pubmed: 15012507
Sci Rep. 2012;2:951
pubmed: 23230516
Plant Physiol. 2009 Mar;149(3):1435-51
pubmed: 19176722
Bioinformatics. 2013 Jan 1;29(1):15-21
pubmed: 23104886
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 18;9(11):e113309
pubmed: 25405461
BMC Genomics. 2013 Oct 24;14:728
pubmed: 24152241
Nucleic Acids Res. 2019 Jan 8;47(D1):D419-D426
pubmed: 30407594
Trends Plant Sci. 2019 Apr;24(4):303-310
pubmed: 30777643
Science. 2006 Sep 29;313(5795):1929-35
pubmed: 17008526
Science. 2018 Aug 17;361(6403):
pubmed: 30115782

Auteurs

Ali Hadizadeh Esfahani (A)

Joint Research Center for Computational Biomedicine, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen 52074, Germany.

Janina Maß (J)

IBG-4: Bioinformatics, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich 52425, Germany.

Asis Hallab (A)

IBG-4: Bioinformatics, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich 52425, Germany.

Bernhard M Schuldt (BM)

Mathematische Modellierung, Düsseldorf, Germany.

David Nevarez (D)

Joint Research Center for Computational Biomedicine, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen 52074, Germany.

Björn Usadel (B)

IBG-4: Bioinformatics, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich 52425, Germany.

Mark-Christoph Ott (MC)

Crop Science Division, Bayer AG, Monheim am Rhein 40789, Germany.

Benjamin Buer (B)

Crop Science Division, Bayer AG, Monheim am Rhein 40789, Germany.

Andreas Schuppert (A)

Joint Research Center for Computational Biomedicine, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen 52074, Germany.

Articles similaires

Selecting optimal software code descriptors-The case of Java.

Yegor Bugayenko, Zamira Kholmatova, Artem Kruglov et al.
1.00
Software Algorithms Programming Languages

Exploring blood-brain barrier passage using atomic weighted vector and machine learning.

Yoan Martínez-López, Paulina Phoobane, Yanaima Jauriga et al.
1.00
Blood-Brain Barrier Machine Learning Humans Support Vector Machine Software
Drought Resistance Gene Expression Profiling Gene Expression Regulation, Plant Gossypium Multigene Family
Arabidopsis Arabidopsis Proteins Osmotic Pressure Cytoplasm RNA, Messenger

Classifications MeSH