Navigating medical assistance in dying from Bill C-14 to Bill C-7: a qualitative study.
End of life
Healthcare systems
Legislation
Medical assistance in dying
Nursing
Qualitative
Journal
BMC health services research
ISSN: 1472-6963
Titre abrégé: BMC Health Serv Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088677
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 Nov 2021
04 Nov 2021
Historique:
received:
09
07
2021
accepted:
26
10
2021
entrez:
5
11
2021
pubmed:
6
11
2021
medline:
9
11
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Even as healthcare providers and systems were settling into the processes required for Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID) under Bill C-14, new legislation was introduced (Bill C-7) that extended assisted death to persons whose natural death is not reasonably foreseeable. The purpose of this paper is to describe the experiences of nurses and nurse practitioners with the implementation and ongoing development of this transition. This qualitative longitudinal descriptive study gathered data through semi-structured telephone interviews with nurses from across Canada; cross sectional data from 2020 to 2021 is reported here. The study received ethical approval and all participants provided written consent. Participants included nurses (n = 34) and nurse practitioners (n = 16) with significant experience with MAID. Participants described how MAID had transitioned from a new, secretive, and anxiety-producing procedure to one that was increasingly visible and normalized, although this normalization did not necessarily mitigate the emotional impact. MAID was becoming more accessible, and participants were learning to trust the process. However, the work was becoming increasingly complex, labour intensive, and often poorly remunerated. Although many participants described a degree of integration between MAID and palliative care services, there remained ongoing tensions around equitable access to both. Participants described an evolving gestalt of determining persons' eligibility for MAID that required a high degree of clinical judgement. Deeming someone ineligible was intensely stressful for all involved and so participants had learned to be resourceful in avoiding this possibility. The required 10-day waiting period was difficult emotionally, particularly if persons worried about losing capacity to give final consent. The implementation of C-7 was perceived to be particularly challenging due to the nature of the population that would seek MAID and the resultant complexity of trying to address the origins of their suffering within a resource-strapped system. Significant social and system calibration must occur to accommodate assisted death as an end-of-life option. The transition to offering MAID for those whose natural death is not reasonably foreseeable will require intensive navigation of a sometimes siloed and inaccessible system. High quality MAID care should be both relational and dialogical and those who provide such care require expert communication skills and knowledge of the healthcare system.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Even as healthcare providers and systems were settling into the processes required for Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID) under Bill C-14, new legislation was introduced (Bill C-7) that extended assisted death to persons whose natural death is not reasonably foreseeable. The purpose of this paper is to describe the experiences of nurses and nurse practitioners with the implementation and ongoing development of this transition.
METHODS
METHODS
This qualitative longitudinal descriptive study gathered data through semi-structured telephone interviews with nurses from across Canada; cross sectional data from 2020 to 2021 is reported here. The study received ethical approval and all participants provided written consent.
FINDINGS
RESULTS
Participants included nurses (n = 34) and nurse practitioners (n = 16) with significant experience with MAID. Participants described how MAID had transitioned from a new, secretive, and anxiety-producing procedure to one that was increasingly visible and normalized, although this normalization did not necessarily mitigate the emotional impact. MAID was becoming more accessible, and participants were learning to trust the process. However, the work was becoming increasingly complex, labour intensive, and often poorly remunerated. Although many participants described a degree of integration between MAID and palliative care services, there remained ongoing tensions around equitable access to both. Participants described an evolving gestalt of determining persons' eligibility for MAID that required a high degree of clinical judgement. Deeming someone ineligible was intensely stressful for all involved and so participants had learned to be resourceful in avoiding this possibility. The required 10-day waiting period was difficult emotionally, particularly if persons worried about losing capacity to give final consent. The implementation of C-7 was perceived to be particularly challenging due to the nature of the population that would seek MAID and the resultant complexity of trying to address the origins of their suffering within a resource-strapped system.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Significant social and system calibration must occur to accommodate assisted death as an end-of-life option. The transition to offering MAID for those whose natural death is not reasonably foreseeable will require intensive navigation of a sometimes siloed and inaccessible system. High quality MAID care should be both relational and dialogical and those who provide such care require expert communication skills and knowledge of the healthcare system.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34736463
doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07222-5
pii: 10.1186/s12913-021-07222-5
pmc: PMC8567982
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1195Subventions
Organisme : CIHR
ID : PJT-148655
Pays : Canada
Organisme : CIHR
ID : PJT-148655
Pays : Canada
Organisme : CIHR
ID : PJT-169144
Pays : Canada
Organisme : CIHR
ID : PJT-148655
Pays : Canada
Organisme : CIHR
ID : PJT-148655
Pays : Canada
Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
Death Stud. 2021 Jun 7;:1-13
pubmed: 34097584
BMC Nurs. 2020 Feb 17;19:12
pubmed: 32095114
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 Aug;56(2):222-229.e1
pubmed: 29775692
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2021 Mar;61(3):513-521.e8
pubmed: 32835830
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2020 Jun;59(6):1287-1303.e1
pubmed: 31881289
J Palliat Care. 2020 Aug 28;:825859720951661
pubmed: 32854581
Nurs Ethics. 2016 Feb;23(1):48-60
pubmed: 25488755
J Palliat Care. 2019 Apr;34(2):78-84
pubmed: 30458670
Palliat Med. 2018 Jan;32(1):114-122
pubmed: 28849727
J Palliat Med. 2021 Sep;24(10):1489-1496
pubmed: 33601999
J Palliat Med. 2021 Feb;24(2):189-194
pubmed: 32584638
J Med Ethics. 2015 Aug;41(8):657-60
pubmed: 25648645
CMAJ. 2016 Nov 1;188(16):E407-E414
pubmed: 27620630
J Clin Nurs. 2020 Feb;29(3-4):492-502
pubmed: 31742806
N Engl J Med. 2017 Aug 3;377(5):492-494
pubmed: 28767342
Palliat Med. 2021 Feb;35(2):447-454
pubmed: 33126842
Death Stud. 2021 Jun 7;:1-15
pubmed: 34097578
Health Policy. 2012 May;105(2-3):296-302
pubmed: 22417862
CMAJ. 2017 Jan 23;189(3):E101-E105
pubmed: 28246154
J Clin Nurs. 2020 Oct;29(19-20):3870-3881
pubmed: 32700402
Lancet. 2012 Sep 8;380(9845):908-15
pubmed: 22789501
Palliat Support Care. 2019 Oct;17(5):590-595
pubmed: 30887936
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 Jun;55(6):1564-1576.e9
pubmed: 29477968
Glob Qual Nurs Res. 2020 Jul 7;7:2333393620938686
pubmed: 32743024