Long-term durability after surgical aortic valve replacement with the Trifecta and the Intuity valve-a comparative analysis.
Aortic Valve
/ diagnostic imaging
Aortic Valve Stenosis
/ surgery
Bioprosthesis
/ adverse effects
Heart Valve Prosthesis
Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation
/ adverse effects
Humans
Male
Prospective Studies
Prosthesis Design
Retrospective Studies
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
Treatment Outcome
Bioprosthetic dysfunction
Long-term durability
Structural valve deterioration
Surgical aortic valve replacement
Journal
European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery
ISSN: 1873-734X
Titre abrégé: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8804069
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
24 Jan 2022
24 Jan 2022
Historique:
received:
22
06
2021
revised:
08
09
2021
accepted:
23
09
2021
pubmed:
6
11
2021
medline:
8
4
2022
entrez:
5
11
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Long-term durability of surgical bio-prostheses is a key factor, especially in the era of transcatheter aortic valve replacement. We compared the incidence of structural valve deterioration (SVD) between patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) with the Trifecta (Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, IL, USA) or the Intuity valve (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, USA). Between April 2010 and May 2020, 1118 patients underwent SAVR with the Trifecta (n = 346) and the Intuity (n = 772) valve at a single centre. A total of 1070 patients (Trifecta n = 298, Intuity n = 772) were analysed after the exclusion of patients with pure regurgitation and endocarditis. Retro- and prospective echocardiographic and clinical follow-up was performed. Cox proportional hazards regression models were performed to identify prognostic factors for SVD, aortic re-interventions and mortality. With 27 cases (Trifecta n = 23, Intuity n = 4) of SVD observed, cumulative incidence of SVD was significantly higher in the Trifecta cohort (P < 0.001). Implantation of a Trifecta valve [hazard ratio (HR) 11.20; 95% confidence interval 3.79-33.09], log-transformed preoperative creatinine (HR 2.47; 1.37-4.44) and sex (male HR 0.42; 0.19-0.92) emerged as prognostic factors of SVD. A significantly higher cumulative incidence of re-interventions was observed in the Trifecta cohort (P = 0.004) and valve type was an independent time-varying risk factor (HR at 12 months 2.78; 95% confidence interval 1.42-5.45). Overall, no significant differences in all-cause mortality were observed between the groups (log-rank test: P = 0.052). SVD was significantly more frequent in patients receiving a Trifecta valve and its implantation was an independent risk factor for the occurrence of SVD and aortic valve re-interventions. This comparative analysis of 2 low-gradient bioprosthesis put the long-term durability of the Trifecta valve in question and need to be taken into consideration when performing bioprosthetic SAVR.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34738111
pii: 6420788
doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezab470
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
416-424Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.