Validation and accuracy evaluation of automatic segmentation for knee joint pre-planning.
3D models
Automatic segmentation
CT imaging
Knee
Journal
The Knee
ISSN: 1873-5800
Titre abrégé: Knee
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9430798
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2021
Dec 2021
Historique:
received:
07
04
2021
revised:
28
09
2021
accepted:
12
10
2021
pubmed:
6
11
2021
medline:
15
12
2021
entrez:
5
11
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Proper use of three-dimensional (3D) models generated from medical imaging data in clinical preoperative planning, training and consultation is based on the preliminary proved accuracy of the replication of the patient anatomy. Therefore, this study investigated the dimensional accuracy of 3D reconstructions of the knee joint generated from computed tomography scans via automatic segmentation by comparing them with 3D models generated through manual segmentation. Three unpaired, fresh-frozen right legs were investigated. Three-dimensional models of the femur and the tibia of each leg were manually segmented using a commercial software and compared in terms of geometrical accuracy with the 3D models automatically segmented using proprietary software. Bony landmarks were identified and used to calculate clinically relevant distances: femoral epicondylar distance; posterior femoral epicondylar distance; femoral trochlear groove length; tibial knee center tubercle distance (TKCTD). Pearson's correlation coefficient and Bland and Altman plots were used to evaluate the level of agreement between measured distances. Differences between parameters measured on 3D models manually and automatically segmented were below 1 mm (range: -0.06 to 0.72 mm), except for TKCTD (between 1.00 and 1.40 mm in two specimens). In addition, there was a significant strong correlation between measurements. The results obtained are comparable to those reported in previous studies where accuracy of bone 3D reconstruction was investigated. Automatic segmentation techniques can be used to quickly reconstruct reliable 3D models of bone anatomy and these results may contribute to enhance the spread of this technology in preoperative and operative settings, where it has shown considerable potential.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Proper use of three-dimensional (3D) models generated from medical imaging data in clinical preoperative planning, training and consultation is based on the preliminary proved accuracy of the replication of the patient anatomy. Therefore, this study investigated the dimensional accuracy of 3D reconstructions of the knee joint generated from computed tomography scans via automatic segmentation by comparing them with 3D models generated through manual segmentation.
METHODS
METHODS
Three unpaired, fresh-frozen right legs were investigated. Three-dimensional models of the femur and the tibia of each leg were manually segmented using a commercial software and compared in terms of geometrical accuracy with the 3D models automatically segmented using proprietary software. Bony landmarks were identified and used to calculate clinically relevant distances: femoral epicondylar distance; posterior femoral epicondylar distance; femoral trochlear groove length; tibial knee center tubercle distance (TKCTD). Pearson's correlation coefficient and Bland and Altman plots were used to evaluate the level of agreement between measured distances.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Differences between parameters measured on 3D models manually and automatically segmented were below 1 mm (range: -0.06 to 0.72 mm), except for TKCTD (between 1.00 and 1.40 mm in two specimens). In addition, there was a significant strong correlation between measurements.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The results obtained are comparable to those reported in previous studies where accuracy of bone 3D reconstruction was investigated. Automatic segmentation techniques can be used to quickly reconstruct reliable 3D models of bone anatomy and these results may contribute to enhance the spread of this technology in preoperative and operative settings, where it has shown considerable potential.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34739958
pii: S0968-0160(21)00258-1
doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2021.10.016
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
275-281Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.