Improving assessment of acute obstetric patients - introducing a Swedish obstetric triage system.
Emergency medicine
Obstetrics
Pregnancy
Quality improvement
Triage
Journal
BMC health services research
ISSN: 1472-6963
Titre abrégé: BMC Health Serv Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088677
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 Nov 2021
06 Nov 2021
Historique:
received:
01
07
2021
accepted:
22
10
2021
entrez:
7
11
2021
pubmed:
8
11
2021
medline:
10
11
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Failure to identify severely ill obstetric patients seeking acute care, and hence delaying treatment, can lead to maternal morbidity and mortality. Triage is the prioritization of patients seeking emergency care, based on clinical decision-making tools assessing medical urgency. While triage has been applied in general emergency medicine for 30 years, there are only a few obstetric triage systems (OTS) and obstetric triage has hitherto been unknown in Sweden. Obstetric triage is more complex than general triage since both mother and fetus require assessment, and pregnancy-related physiological changes must be taken into account. This paper aims to describe the development and an initial evaluation of the first OTS in Sweden. A multidisciplinary team surveyed reasons to seek acute obstetric care and the current patient flow at the largest obstetric unit in Scandinavia, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden, with about 10,000 deliveries/year. A semi-structured literature review on obstetric triage was undertaken. Based on the survey and the literature review the first Swedish OTS was developed and implemented. Patient satisfaction was followed by electronical questionnaires. Initial validity evaluation was performed, defined by the system's ability to identify patients with need for hospital admission, stratified by acuity level. The Gothenburg Obstetrical Triage System (GOTS) addresses the patient to one of five acuity levels based on both vital signs and 14 chief complaint algorithms. It entails recommendations for initial procedures of care as well as an acuity form for documentation. Initial evaluation of the system indicates good correlation between need for admission and acuity level. The implementation has provided the staff with an improved medical overview of the patients and patient flow and enabled the unit to monitor emergency care in a structured way. Implementation came along with increased patient and staff satisfaction. The GOTS is the first OTS developed in and for Sweden and implementation has improved management of obstetric patients seeking acute care. Patients are now prioritized according to level of acuity and the time to assessment and treatment of severely ill patients can be structurally evaluated. Both patients and staff express improved satisfaction with obstetric triage.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Failure to identify severely ill obstetric patients seeking acute care, and hence delaying treatment, can lead to maternal morbidity and mortality. Triage is the prioritization of patients seeking emergency care, based on clinical decision-making tools assessing medical urgency. While triage has been applied in general emergency medicine for 30 years, there are only a few obstetric triage systems (OTS) and obstetric triage has hitherto been unknown in Sweden. Obstetric triage is more complex than general triage since both mother and fetus require assessment, and pregnancy-related physiological changes must be taken into account. This paper aims to describe the development and an initial evaluation of the first OTS in Sweden.
METHODS
METHODS
A multidisciplinary team surveyed reasons to seek acute obstetric care and the current patient flow at the largest obstetric unit in Scandinavia, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden, with about 10,000 deliveries/year. A semi-structured literature review on obstetric triage was undertaken. Based on the survey and the literature review the first Swedish OTS was developed and implemented. Patient satisfaction was followed by electronical questionnaires. Initial validity evaluation was performed, defined by the system's ability to identify patients with need for hospital admission, stratified by acuity level.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The Gothenburg Obstetrical Triage System (GOTS) addresses the patient to one of five acuity levels based on both vital signs and 14 chief complaint algorithms. It entails recommendations for initial procedures of care as well as an acuity form for documentation. Initial evaluation of the system indicates good correlation between need for admission and acuity level. The implementation has provided the staff with an improved medical overview of the patients and patient flow and enabled the unit to monitor emergency care in a structured way. Implementation came along with increased patient and staff satisfaction.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The GOTS is the first OTS developed in and for Sweden and implementation has improved management of obstetric patients seeking acute care. Patients are now prioritized according to level of acuity and the time to assessment and treatment of severely ill patients can be structurally evaluated. Both patients and staff express improved satisfaction with obstetric triage.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34742302
doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07210-9
pii: 10.1186/s12913-021-07210-9
pmc: PMC8572438
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1207Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s).
Références
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Sep 18;17(1):309
pubmed: 28923021
Int Emerg Nurs. 2009 Oct;17(4):226-32
pubmed: 19782334
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2015 Nov-Dec;44(6):710-6
pubmed: 26469540
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2006 May;32(5):239-45
pubmed: 16761787
Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Jul;128(1):e16-e19
pubmed: 27333358
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019 Jan;98(1):7-10
pubmed: 30155879
Emerg Med J. 2017 Jul;34(7):448-453
pubmed: 28473527
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2015 Nov-Dec;44(6):701-9
pubmed: 26469714
Int Emerg Nurs. 2018 May;38:21-28
pubmed: 29326039
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Oct;209(4):287-93
pubmed: 23535239
MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2014 Sep-Oct;39(5):284-97; quiz 298-9
pubmed: 24905040
BJOG. 2011 Mar;118 Suppl 1:1-203
pubmed: 21356004
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2011 Jun 30;19:42
pubmed: 21718476
J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2007 Oct-Dec;21(4):315-22
pubmed: 18004169
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2016 Feb;38(2):125-33
pubmed: 27032736
Emerg Med J. 2007 Jul;24(7):477-9
pubmed: 17582037
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2015 Nov-Dec;44(6):693-700
pubmed: 26469198
MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2011 Sep-Oct;36(5):290-6
pubmed: 21857199
J Emerg Med. 2011 Jun;40(6):623-8
pubmed: 18930373
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017 Sep;96(9):1112-1119
pubmed: 28542709
J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2016 Oct/Dec;34(4):310-318
pubmed: 27513609
BJOG. 2017 Nov;124(12):1867-1873
pubmed: 28294509
Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2019 Jan 13;7(1):e13
pubmed: 30847448
Adv J Emerg Med. 2019 Oct 03;4(1):e6
pubmed: 31938775
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2016 Nov;44(6):752-757
pubmed: 27832564
Anaesthesia. 2013 Apr;68(4):354-67
pubmed: 23488833
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 May 6;20(1):275
pubmed: 32375808
Ann Emerg Med. 2019 Jul;74(1):140-152
pubmed: 30470513