Blood Pressure and Safety Events With Vericiguat in the VICTORIA Trial.


Journal

Journal of the American Heart Association
ISSN: 2047-9980
Titre abrégé: J Am Heart Assoc
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101580524

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
16 11 2021
Historique:
pubmed: 9 11 2021
medline: 3 3 2022
entrez: 8 11 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Background Although safety and tolerability of vericiguat were established in the VICTORIA (Vericiguat Global Study in Subjects With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction) trial in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, some subgroups may be more susceptible to symptomatic hypotension, such as older patients, those with lower baseline systolic blood pressure (SBP), or those concurrently taking angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors. We described the SBP trajectories over time and compared the occurrence of symptomatic hypotension or syncope by treatment arm in potentially vulnerable subgroups in VICTORIA. We also evaluated the relation between the efficacy of vericiguat and baseline SBP. Methods and Results Among patients receiving at least 1 dose of the study drug (n=5034), potentially vulnerable subgroups were those >75 years old (n=1395), those with baseline SBP 100-110 mm Hg (n=1344), and those taking angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors (n=730). SBP trajectory was plotted as mean change from baseline over time. The treatment effect on time to symptomatic hypotension or syncope was evaluated overall and by subgroup, and the primary efficacy composite outcome (heart failure hospitalization or cardiovascular death) across baseline SBP was examined using Cox proportional hazards models. SBP trajectories showed a small initial decline in SBP with vericiguat in those >75 years old (versus younger patients), as well as those receiving angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors (versus none), with SBP returning to baseline thereafter. Patients with SBP <110 mm Hg at baseline showed a trend to increasing SBP over time, which was similar in both treatment arms. Safety event rates were generally low and similar between treatment arms within each subgroup. In Cox proportional hazards analysis, there were similar numbers of safety events with vericiguat versus placebo (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.18; 95% CI, 0.99-1.39;

Identifiants

pubmed: 34743540
doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.021094
pmc: PMC8751950
doi:

Substances chimiques

Heterocyclic Compounds, 2-Ring 0
Pyrimidines 0
Receptors, Angiotensin 0
Neprilysin EC 3.4.24.11
vericiguat LV66ADM269

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02861534']

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e021094

Références

J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Dec 9;52(24):2000-7
pubmed: 19055992
Circ Heart Fail. 2008 May;1(1):34-42
pubmed: 19808268
Eur Heart J. 2017 Apr 14;38(15):1132-1143
pubmed: 28158398
JACC Heart Fail. 2018 Feb;6(2):96-104
pubmed: 29032136
Heart Fail Rev. 2013 Mar;18(2):107-22
pubmed: 22581217
Cardiovasc Res. 2020 Oct 1;116(12):e152-e155
pubmed: 32980877
Circulation. 2020 Jan 14;141(2):100-111
pubmed: 31736328
Cardiovasc Drug Rev. 2007 Spring;25(1):30-45
pubmed: 17445086
N Engl J Med. 2020 May 14;382(20):1883-1893
pubmed: 32222134
JACC Heart Fail. 2020 Nov;8(11):931-939
pubmed: 33039447
N Engl J Med. 2014 Sep 11;371(11):993-1004
pubmed: 25176015
JACC Heart Fail. 2019 Apr;7(4):350-358
pubmed: 30738978
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Jul 24;72(4):351-366
pubmed: 30025570
Eur Heart J. 2020 Sep 21;41(36):3402-3418
pubmed: 32820334

Auteurs

Carolyn S P Lam (CSP)

National Heart Centre Singapore & Duke-National University of Singapore Singapore.

Hillary Mulder (H)

Duke Clinical Research InstituteDuke University School of Medicine Durham NC.

Yuri Lopatin (Y)

Volgograd State Medical UniversityRegional Cardiology Centre Volgograd Volgograd Russian Federation.

Jose B Vazquez-Tanus (JB)

Ponce School of Medicine Ponce Puerto Rico.
Research & Cardiovascular Center and Cardiometabolic Research Center Ponce Puerto Rico.

David Siu (D)

Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine The University of Hong Kong Hong Kong.

Justin Ezekowitz (J)

Canadian VIGOUR Centre University of Alberta Edmonton Canada.

Burkert Pieske (B)

Charité University MedicineGerman Heart Center Berlin Germany.

Christopher M O'Connor (CM)

Inova Heart and Vascular Institute Falls Church VA.

Lothar Roessig (L)

Bayer AG Wuppertal Germany.

Mahesh J Patel (MJ)

Merck & Co. Inc. Kenilworth NJ.

Kevin J Anstrom (KJ)

Duke Clinical Research InstituteDuke University School of Medicine Durham NC.

Adrian F Hernandez (AF)

Duke Clinical Research InstituteDuke University School of Medicine Durham NC.

Paul W Armstrong (PW)

Canadian VIGOUR Centre University of Alberta Edmonton Canada.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH