Effect of print orientation on the dimensional accuracy of orthodontic aligners printed 3-dimensionally.
Journal
American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics
ISSN: 1097-6752
Titre abrégé: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8610224
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Nov 2021
Nov 2021
Historique:
received:
01
10
2020
revised:
01
12
2020
accepted:
01
01
2021
entrez:
9
11
2021
pubmed:
10
11
2021
medline:
12
11
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Fabrication of orthodontic aligners directly via 3-dimensional (3D) printing presents the potential to increase the efficiency of aligner production relative to traditional workflows; however tunable aspects of the 3D-printing process might affect the dimensional fidelity of the fabricated appliances. This study aimed to investigate the effect of print orientation on the dimensional accuracy of orthodontic aligners printed directly with a 3D printer. A digitally designed aligner of 500 μm thickness was printed in 3D in Grey V4 (Formlabs, Somerville, Mass) resin at 8 angulations at 45° intervals (n = 10 per angulation) using a stereolithography 3D printer. Each aligner was scanned with an optical scanner, and all but the intaglio surface of each scan was digitally removed. Each resultant scan file was superimposed onto the isolated intaglio of the designed master aligner file. The dimensional deviation was quantified with Geomagic Control software (3D Systems, Rock Hill, SC), and data were analyzed using R statistical software (version 2018; R Core Team, Vienna, Austria) (P <0.05). Print angle showed a statistically significant effect on standard deviation, average positive deviation, absolute average negative deviation, and percentage of points out of bounds (tolerance bounds defined as ±250 μm) (P <0.05). Qualitative analysis of the 3D surface deviation maps indicated that the 0° and 90° groups showed less deviation and appeared to be the most accurate in the anterior regions. Overall, the majority of the print angle groups studied were not printed within clinically acceptable tolerance ranges, with the major exception being the 90° group, which printed nominally within clinically acceptable tolerance ranges. With the workflow applied, print orientation significantly affects the dimensional accuracy of directly 3D-printed orthodontic aligners. Within the limitations of this study, printing at the 90° angulation would be advised as it is the group with the most accurate prints relative to the 7 other orientations investigated, although not all differences were statistically significant.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34752256
pii: S0889-5406(21)00411-X
doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2021.01.018
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
732-742.e1Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Published by Elsevier Inc.