Comparing Sources of Disruptions to Telemedicine-Enabled Stroke Care in an Ambulance.
environmental hazards
flow disruptions
layout
stroke assessment
telemedicine
Journal
HERD
ISSN: 2167-5112
Titre abrégé: HERD
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101537529
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2022
04 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
13
11
2021
medline:
7
5
2022
entrez:
12
11
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The purpose of this study is to understand the nature and source of disruptions in an ambulance during the telemedicine-based caregiving process for stroke patients to enhance the ambulance design for supporting telemedicine-based care. Telemedicine is emerging as an efficient approach to provide timely remote assessment of patients experiencing acute stroke in an ambulance. These consults are facilitated by connecting the patient and paramedic with a remotely located neurologist and nurse using cameras, audio systems, and computers. However, ambulances are typically retrofitted to support telemedicine-enabled care, and the placement of these systems inside the ambulance might lead to spatial challenges and disruptions during patient evaluation. Video recordings of 13 simulated telemedicine-based stroke consults were coded and analyzed using an existing systems-based flow disruption (FD) taxonomy. For each observed disruption-the type, severity or impact, location in the ambulance, and equipment involved in the disruption were recorded. Seat size, arrangement of assessment equipment, location of telemedicine equipment (computer workstation), and design of telemedicine camera were among the factors that impacted telemedicine-related disruptions. The left ambulance seat zone and head of the patient bed were more involved in environmental hazard-related disruptions, while the right zone of the ambulance was more prone to interruptions and communication-related disruptions. Adequate evaluation space for the paramedic, proper placement of evaluation equipment, and telemedicine computer location could facilitate the stroke care evaluation process and reduce FDs in the ambulance.
Sections du résumé
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this study is to understand the nature and source of disruptions in an ambulance during the telemedicine-based caregiving process for stroke patients to enhance the ambulance design for supporting telemedicine-based care.
BACKGROUND
Telemedicine is emerging as an efficient approach to provide timely remote assessment of patients experiencing acute stroke in an ambulance. These consults are facilitated by connecting the patient and paramedic with a remotely located neurologist and nurse using cameras, audio systems, and computers. However, ambulances are typically retrofitted to support telemedicine-enabled care, and the placement of these systems inside the ambulance might lead to spatial challenges and disruptions during patient evaluation.
METHOD
Video recordings of 13 simulated telemedicine-based stroke consults were coded and analyzed using an existing systems-based flow disruption (FD) taxonomy. For each observed disruption-the type, severity or impact, location in the ambulance, and equipment involved in the disruption were recorded.
RESULTS
Seat size, arrangement of assessment equipment, location of telemedicine equipment (computer workstation), and design of telemedicine camera were among the factors that impacted telemedicine-related disruptions. The left ambulance seat zone and head of the patient bed were more involved in environmental hazard-related disruptions, while the right zone of the ambulance was more prone to interruptions and communication-related disruptions.
CONCLUSION
Adequate evaluation space for the paramedic, proper placement of evaluation equipment, and telemedicine computer location could facilitate the stroke care evaluation process and reduce FDs in the ambulance.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34763545
doi: 10.1177/19375867211054759
pmc: PMC10398637
mid: NIHMS1909064
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
96-115Subventions
Organisme : AHRQ HHS
ID : R03 HS026809
Pays : United States
Références
Urology. 2018 Apr;114:105-113
pubmed: 29371162
Hum Factors. 2007 Dec;49(6):1019-32
pubmed: 18074701
Appl Ergon. 2005 Jan;36(1):97-105
pubmed: 15627427
JAMA. 2013 Jun 19;309(23):2480-8
pubmed: 23780461
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2021 May;30(5):105710
pubmed: 33690029
Ann Surg. 2015 Jun;261(6):1079-84
pubmed: 26291954
Telemed J E Health. 2017 Sep;23(9):707-717
pubmed: 28294704
Injury. 2014 Sep;45(9):1413-21
pubmed: 24560091
Anesthesiology. 2013 Nov;119(5):1066-77
pubmed: 23811697
Hum Factors. 2022 Feb;64(1):21-41
pubmed: 33657904
BJU Int. 2016 Jul;118(1):132-9
pubmed: 26800347
HERD. 2018 Jul;11(3):124-138
pubmed: 29355033
Ergonomics. 2006 Apr 15-May 15;49(5-6):589-604
pubmed: 16717011
Surgery. 2007 Nov;142(5):658-65
pubmed: 17981185
Health Manpow Manage. 1997;23(4-5):140-7
pubmed: 10173518
Ergonomics. 2006 Apr 15-May 15;49(5-6):567-88
pubmed: 16717010
BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 Apr;28(4):276-283
pubmed: 30158119