A novel serum biomarker quintet reveals added prognostic value when combined with standard clinical parameters in prostate cancer patients by predicting biochemical recurrence and adverse pathology.
Adult
Aged
Antigens, Neoplasm
/ blood
Biomarkers, Tumor
/ blood
Germany
/ epidemiology
Humans
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
/ blood
Neoplasm Staging
Prognosis
Prostate-Specific Antigen
/ blood
Prostatectomy
/ methods
Prostatic Neoplasms
/ blood
Retrospective Studies
Risk Assessment
Treatment Outcome
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
28
05
2021
accepted:
12
10
2021
entrez:
12
11
2021
pubmed:
13
11
2021
medline:
31
12
2021
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The objective was to determine the prognostic utility of a new biomarker combination in prostate cancer (PCa) patients undergoing Radical Prostatectomy (RP). Serum samples and clinical data of 557 men who underwent RP for PCa with pathological stage (pT) <3 at Martini Clinic (Hamburg, Germany) were used for analysis. Clinical Grade Group and clinical stage was determined using biopsy samples while tumor marker concentrations were measured in serum using immunoassays. The prognostic utility of the proposed marker combination was assessed using Cox proportional hazard regression and Kaplan-Meier analysis. The performance was compared to the Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment (CAPRA) score in the overall cohort and in a low-risk patient subset. A multivariable model comprising fibronectin 1, galectin-3-binding protein, lumican, matrix metalloprotease 9, thrombospondin-1 and PSA together with clinical Grade Group (GG) and clinical stage (cT) was created. The proposed model was a significant predictor of biochemical recurrence (BCR) (HR 1.29 per 5 units score, 95%CI 1.20-1.38, p<0.001). The Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the proposed model had a better prediction for low-risk disease after RP compared to CAPRA (respectively 5.0% vs. 9.1% chance of BCR). In a pre-defined low risk population subset, the risk of BCR using the proposed model was below 5.2% and thus lower when compared to CAPRA = 0-2 (9%), GG<2 (7%) and NCCN = low-risk (6%) subsets. Additionally, the proposed model could significantly (p<0.001) discriminate patients with adverse pathology (AP) events at RP from those without. In conclusion, the proposed model is superior to CAPRA for the prediction of BCR after RP in the overall cohort as well as a in a pre-defined low risk patient population subset. It is also significantly associated with AP at RP.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34767586
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259093
pii: PONE-D-21-17494
pmc: PMC8589165
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antigens, Neoplasm
0
Biomarkers, Tumor
0
LGALS3BP protein, human
0
Prostate-Specific Antigen
EC 3.4.21.77
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0259093Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have read the journal’s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: AA, AW, RH, OS, and RS are paid employees of Proteomedix AG. TS is a scientific advisor to Proteomedix. RS has founder shares of Proteomedix. AA, AW, RH, and RS are named as inventors on a patent application for the biomarkers described in this publication (CH 00752/21). This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.
Références
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998 May 20;90(10):766-71
pubmed: 9605647
Urol Oncol. 2016 Sep;34(9):415.e1-6
pubmed: 27140065
J Clin Epidemiol. 1996 Aug;49(8):907-16
pubmed: 8699212
Urol Res. 2005 Feb;33(1):44-50
pubmed: 15517230
Cancer. 2011 Nov 15;117(22):5039-46
pubmed: 21647869
RNA Dis. 2017;4(1):
pubmed: 28251177
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 Jan;71(1):7-33
pubmed: 33433946
World J Urol. 2014 Apr;32(2):431-5
pubmed: 23824175
Prostate. 2006 Feb 15;66(3):283-93
pubmed: 16245278
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 2;12(8):e0181557
pubmed: 28767721
J Urol. 2004 Apr;171(4):1393-401
pubmed: 15017184
Exp Cell Res. 2013 Apr 15;319(7):967-81
pubmed: 23399832
J Urol. 2019 Oct;202(4):702-709
pubmed: 31026214
PLoS One. 2020 May 18;15(5):e0233442
pubmed: 32421745
Urol Int. 2018;100(3):251-262
pubmed: 29161715
Br J Cancer. 2012 Mar 13;106(6):1095-9
pubmed: 22361632
Cancer. 2006 Nov 15;107(10):2384-91
pubmed: 17039503
Eur Urol. 2014 Feb;65(2):467-79
pubmed: 24321502
J Urol. 2001 Jan;165(1):119-25
pubmed: 11125379
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Feb 22;108(8):3342-7
pubmed: 21300890
Eur Urol. 2014 Sep;66(3):550-60
pubmed: 24836057
Transpl Int. 2017 Jan;30(1):6-10
pubmed: 27896874