Patterns of Prescribing Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors for Medicare Beneficiaries in the United States.
Medicare
cardiovascular diseases
clinical trial
metformin
sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor
Journal
Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes
ISSN: 1941-7705
Titre abrégé: Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101489148
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 2021
12 2021
Historique:
pubmed:
16
11
2021
medline:
22
1
2022
entrez:
15
11
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Evidence from large randomized clinical trials supports the benefit of SGLT2i (sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors) to improve cardiovascular and kidney outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes with or at high risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease or chronic kidney disease. Considering this evidence, which has been expanding since the product label indication for empagliflozin to reduce risk of cardiovascular death in 2016, clinician-level variation in the prescription of SGLT2i among US Medicare beneficiaries was evaluated. Antihyperglycemic medication prescribers were identified as those physicians and advanced practice providers prescribing metformin in Medicare part D prescriber data. In this cross-sectional study, the proportion prescribing SGLT2i was assessed overall and across specialties in 2018, with changes assessed from 2014 to 2018. SGLT2i use was compared with other second-line antihyperglycemic medication classes, sulfonylureas and DPP4is (dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors). Among 232 523 unique clinicians who prescribed metformin for Medicare beneficiaries in 2018 (diabetes-treating clinicians), 45 255 (19.5%) prescribed SGLT2i. There was substantial variation across specialties-from 72% of endocrinologists to 14% of cardiologists who prescribed metformin also prescribed SGLT2i. Between 2014 and 2018, the number prescribing SGLT2i increased 5-fold from 9048 in 2014 to 45 255 in 2018. Among clinicians who prescribed both sulfonylureas and SGLT2i in 2018, SGLT2i was prescribed to a median 33 beneficiaries for every 100 prescribed sulfonylureas (interquartile range, 18-67). SGLT2i use relative to sulfonylureas increased from 19 (interquartile range, 11-34) per 100 in 2014 to 33 (interquartile range, 18-67) per 100 in 2018 ( Eighty percent of clinicians prescribing metformin to Medicare beneficiaries did not prescribe SGLT2i in 2018. Moreover, sulfonylureas prescriptions were 3 times more frequent than those of SGLT2is, although a pattern of increasing uptake may portend future trends. These findings highlight a baseline opportunity to improve care and outcomes for patients with type 2 diabetes.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Evidence from large randomized clinical trials supports the benefit of SGLT2i (sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors) to improve cardiovascular and kidney outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes with or at high risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease or chronic kidney disease. Considering this evidence, which has been expanding since the product label indication for empagliflozin to reduce risk of cardiovascular death in 2016, clinician-level variation in the prescription of SGLT2i among US Medicare beneficiaries was evaluated.
METHODS
Antihyperglycemic medication prescribers were identified as those physicians and advanced practice providers prescribing metformin in Medicare part D prescriber data. In this cross-sectional study, the proportion prescribing SGLT2i was assessed overall and across specialties in 2018, with changes assessed from 2014 to 2018. SGLT2i use was compared with other second-line antihyperglycemic medication classes, sulfonylureas and DPP4is (dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors).
RESULTS
Among 232 523 unique clinicians who prescribed metformin for Medicare beneficiaries in 2018 (diabetes-treating clinicians), 45 255 (19.5%) prescribed SGLT2i. There was substantial variation across specialties-from 72% of endocrinologists to 14% of cardiologists who prescribed metformin also prescribed SGLT2i. Between 2014 and 2018, the number prescribing SGLT2i increased 5-fold from 9048 in 2014 to 45 255 in 2018. Among clinicians who prescribed both sulfonylureas and SGLT2i in 2018, SGLT2i was prescribed to a median 33 beneficiaries for every 100 prescribed sulfonylureas (interquartile range, 18-67). SGLT2i use relative to sulfonylureas increased from 19 (interquartile range, 11-34) per 100 in 2014 to 33 (interquartile range, 18-67) per 100 in 2018 (
CONCLUSIONS
Eighty percent of clinicians prescribing metformin to Medicare beneficiaries did not prescribe SGLT2i in 2018. Moreover, sulfonylureas prescriptions were 3 times more frequent than those of SGLT2is, although a pattern of increasing uptake may portend future trends. These findings highlight a baseline opportunity to improve care and outcomes for patients with type 2 diabetes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34779654
doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.121.008381
pmc: PMC9022137
mid: NIHMS1770687
doi:
Substances chimiques
Hypoglycemic Agents
0
Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors
0
Sodium
9NEZ333N27
Glucose
IY9XDZ35W2
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e008381Subventions
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : K23 HL153775
Pays : United States
Références
N Engl J Med. 2020 Oct 8;383(15):1436-1446
pubmed: 32970396
Diab Vasc Dis Res. 2020 Jul-Aug;17(4):1479164120945674
pubmed: 32722930
N Engl J Med. 2019 May 9;380(19):1881-1882
pubmed: 31067395
N Engl J Med. 2019 Nov 21;381(21):1995-2008
pubmed: 31535829
Circulation. 2019 Mar 12;139(11):1384-1395
pubmed: 30586757
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Dec 25;72(25):3370-3372
pubmed: 30409566
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Apr 1;4(4):e216139
pubmed: 33856475
Pharmacoeconomics. 2019 Jun;37(6):777-818
pubmed: 30854589
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Dec 1;180(12):1696-1699
pubmed: 32926091
N Engl J Med. 2020 Oct 8;383(15):1413-1424
pubmed: 32865377
N Engl J Med. 2017 Aug 17;377(7):644-657
pubmed: 28605608
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 May 1;3(5):e205411
pubmed: 32442290
N Engl J Med. 2019 Jun 13;380(24):2295-2306
pubmed: 30990260
N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 26;373(22):2117-28
pubmed: 26378978