The cryo-EM structure of the chloroplast ClpP complex.


Journal

Nature plants
ISSN: 2055-0278
Titre abrégé: Nat Plants
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101651677

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
11 2021
Historique:
received: 03 11 2020
accepted: 12 10 2021
entrez: 16 11 2021
pubmed: 17 11 2021
medline: 27 1 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Protein homoeostasis in plastids is strategically regulated by the protein quality control system involving multiple chaperones and proteases, among them the Clp protease. Here, we determined the structure of the chloroplast ClpP complex from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii by cryo-electron microscopy. ClpP contains two heptameric catalytic rings without any symmetry. The top ring contains one ClpR6, three ClpP4 and three ClpP5 subunits while the bottom ring is composed of three ClpP1

Identifiants

pubmed: 34782772
doi: 10.1038/s41477-021-01020-x
pii: 10.1038/s41477-021-01020-x
doi:

Substances chimiques

Chaperonins EC 3.6.1.-

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1505-1515

Informations de copyright

© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.

Références

Cyr, D. M., Hohfeld, J. & Patterson, C. Protein quality control: U-box-containing E3 ubiquitin ligases join the fold. Trends Biochem. Sci. 27, 368–375 (2002).
pubmed: 12114026 doi: 10.1016/S0968-0004(02)02125-4
Bukau, B., Weissman, J. & Horwich, A. Molecular chaperones and protein quality control. Cell 125, 443–451 (2006).
pubmed: 16678092 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.04.014
Janska, H., Kwasniak, M. & Szczepanowska, J. Protein quality control in organelles—AAA/FtsH story. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Res. 1833, 381–387 (2013).
doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2012.03.016
Baker, B. M. & Haynes, C. M. Mitochondrial protein quality control during biogenesis and aging. Trends Biochem. Sci. 36, 254–261 (2011).
pubmed: 21353780 doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2011.01.004
Sontag, E. M., Samant, R. S. & Frydman, J. Mechanisms and functions of spatial protein quality control. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 86, 97–122 (2017).
pubmed: 28489421 doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-060815-014616
Hayer-Hartl, M., Bracher, A. & Hartl, F. U. The GroEL-GroES chaperonin machine: a nano-cage for protein folding. Trends Biochem. Sci. 41, 62–76 (2016).
pubmed: 26422689 doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2015.07.009
Kuo, W. et al. CHAPERONIN 20 mediates iron superoxide dismutase (Fe SOD) activity independent of its co-chaperonin role in Arabidopsis chloroplasts. New Phytol. 197, 99–110 (2013).
pubmed: 23057508 doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04369.x
Zhang, X. et al. Arabidopsis co-chaperonin CPN20 antagonizes Mg-chelatase H subunit to derepress ABA-responsive WRKY40 transcription repressor. Sci. China Life Sci. 57, 11–21 (2014).
pubmed: 24369350 doi: 10.1007/s11427-013-4587-9
Zhang, X.-F. et al. Cochaperonin CPN20 negatively regulates abscisic acid signaling in Arabidopsis. Plant Mol. Biol. 83, 205–218 (2013).
pubmed: 23783410 pmcid: 3777161 doi: 10.1007/s11103-013-0082-8
Rawlings, N. D. et al. The MEROPS database of proteolytic enzymes, their substrates and inhibitors in 2017 and a comparison with peptidases in the PANTHER database. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, D624–D632 (2017).
pmcid: 5753285 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx1134
Nishimura, K., Kato, Y. & Sakamoto, W. Chloroplast proteases: updates on proteolysis within and across suborganellar compartments. Plant Physiol. 171, 2280–2293 (2016).
pubmed: 27288365 pmcid: 4972267 doi: 10.1104/pp.16.00330
Gottesman, S. Proteases and their targets in Escherichia coli. Annu. Rev. Genet. 30, 465–506 (1996).
pubmed: 8982462 doi: 10.1146/annurev.genet.30.1.465
Wang, J., Hartling, J. A. & Flanagan, J. M. The structure of ClpP at 2.3 Å resolution suggests a model for ATP-dependent proteolysis. Cell 91, 447–456 (1997).
pubmed: 9390554 doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80431-6
Sauer, R. T. & Baker, T. A. AAA+ proteases: ATP-fueled machines of protein destruction. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 80, 587–612 (2011).
pubmed: 21469952 doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-060408-172623
Ripstein, Z. A., Vahidi, S., Houry, W. A., Rubinstein, J. L. & Kay, L. E. A processive rotary mechanism couples substrate unfolding and proteolysis in the ClpXP degradation machinery. eLife 9, e52158 (2020).
pubmed: 31916936 pmcid: 7112952 doi: 10.7554/eLife.52158
Lopez, K. E. et al. Conformational plasticity of the ClpAP AAA+ protease couples protein unfolding and proteolysis. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 27, 406–416 (2020).
pubmed: 32313240 pmcid: 7529148 doi: 10.1038/s41594-020-0409-5
Fei, X. et al. Structures of the ATP-fueled ClpXP proteolytic machine bound to protein substrate. eLife 9, e52774 (2020).
pubmed: 32108573 pmcid: 7112951 doi: 10.7554/eLife.52774
Gatsogiannis, C., Balogh, D., Merino, F., Sieber, S. A. & Raunser, S. Cryo-EM structure of the ClpXP protein degradation machinery. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 26, 946–954 (2019).
pubmed: 31582852 pmcid: 6783313 doi: 10.1038/s41594-019-0304-0
de Sagarra, M. R. et al. Mitochondrial localization and oligomeric structure of HClpP, the human homologue of E. coli ClpP. J. Mol. Biol. 292, 819–825 (1999).
pubmed: 10525407 doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1999.3121
Kim, J. et al. Structures, functions, and interactions of ClpT1 and ClpT2 in the Clp protease system of Arabidopsis chloroplasts. Plant Cell 27, 1477–1496 (2015).
pubmed: 25921872 pmcid: 4456643 doi: 10.1105/tpc.15.00106
Sjögren, L. L. & Clarke, A. K. Assembly of the chloroplast ATP-dependent Clp protease in Arabidopsis is regulated by the ClpT accessory proteins. Plant Cell 23, 322–332 (2011).
pubmed: 21266658 pmcid: 3051245 doi: 10.1105/tpc.110.082321
Olinares, P. D., Kim, J., Davis, J. I. & van Wijk, K. J. Subunit stoichiometry, evolution, and functional implications of an asymmetric plant plastid ClpP/R protease complex in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 23, 2348–2361 (2011).
pubmed: 21712416 pmcid: 3160023 doi: 10.1105/tpc.111.086454
Stanne, T. M., Pojidaeva, E., Andersson, F. I. & Clarke, A. K. Distinctive types of ATP-dependent Clp proteases in cyanobacteria. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 14394–14402 (2007).
pubmed: 17371875 doi: 10.1074/jbc.M700275200
Majeran, W., Friso, G., van Wijk, K. J. & Vallon, O. The chloroplast ClpP complex in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii contains an unusual high molecular mass subunit with a large apical domain. FEBS J. 272, 5558–5571 (2005).
pubmed: 16262695 doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2005.04951.x
Schroda, M. & Vallon, O. in The Chlamydomonas Sourcebook 2nd edn (eds Harris, E. H. et al.) 671–729 (Academic Press, 2009).
Derrien, B., Majeran, W., Wollman, F.-A. & Vallon, O. Multistep processing of an insertion sequence in an essential subunit of the chloroplast ClpP complex. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 15408–15415 (2009).
pubmed: 19346247 pmcid: 2708837 doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.002733
Majeran, W., Wostrikoff, K., Wollman, F. A. & Vallon, O. Role of ClpP in the biogenesis and degradation of RuBisCO and ATP synthase in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Plants 8, 191 (2019).
pmcid: 6681370 doi: 10.3390/plants8070191
Ramundo, S. et al. Conditional depletion of the Chlamydomonas chloroplast ClpP protease activates nuclear genes involved in autophagy and plastid protein quality control. Plant Cell 26, 2201–2222 (2014).
pubmed: 24879428 pmcid: 4079378 doi: 10.1105/tpc.114.124842
Sjogren, L. L., Stanne, T. M., Zheng, B., Sutinen, S. & Clarke, A. K. Structural and functional insights into the chloroplast ATP-dependent Clp protease in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 18, 2635–2649 (2006).
pubmed: 16980539 pmcid: 1626633 doi: 10.1105/tpc.106.044594
Kim, J. et al. Subunits of the plastid ClpPR protease complex have differential contributions to embryogenesis, plastid biogenesis, and plant development in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 21, 1669–1692 (2009).
pubmed: 19525416 pmcid: 2714938 doi: 10.1105/tpc.108.063784
Vahidi, S. et al. An allosteric switch regulates Mycobacterium tuberculosis ClpP1P2 protease function as established by cryo-EM and methyl-TROSY NMR. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 5895–5906 (2020).
pubmed: 32123115 pmcid: 7084164 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1921630117
Derrien, B. et al. The purification of the Chlamydomonas reinhardtii chloroplast ClpP complex: additional subunits and structural features. Plant Mol. Biol. 80, 189–202 (2012).
pubmed: 22772861 pmcid: 3500782 doi: 10.1007/s11103-012-9939-5
LaBreck, C. J., May, S., Viola, M. G., Conti, J. & Camberg, J. L. The protein chaperone ClpX targets native and non-native aggregated substrates for remodeling, disassembly, and degradation with ClpP. Front Mol. Biosci. 4, 26 (2017).
pubmed: 28523271 pmcid: 5415555 doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2017.00026
Gersch, M. et al. AAA+ chaperones and acyldepsipeptides activate the ClpP protease via conformational control. Nat. Commun. 6, 6320 (2015).
pubmed: 25695750 doi: 10.1038/ncomms7320
Sass, P. et al. Antibiotic acyldepsipeptides activate ClpP peptidase to degrade the cell division protein FtsZ. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 17474–17479 (2011).
pubmed: 21969594 pmcid: 3198362 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1110385108
Kirstein, J. et al. The antibiotic ADEP reprogrammes ClpP, switching it from a regulated to an uncontrolled protease. EMBO Mol. Med. 1, 37–49 (2009).
pubmed: 20049702 pmcid: 3378108 doi: 10.1002/emmm.200900002
Zhao, Q. et al. Hetero-oligomeric CPN60 resembles highly symmetric group-I chaperonin structure revealed by Cryo-EM. Plant J. 98, 798–812 (2019).
pubmed: 30735603 doi: 10.1111/tpj.14273
Tsai, Y.-C. C., Mueller-Cajar, O., Saschenbrecker, S., Hartl, F. U. & Hayer-Hartl, M. Chaperonin cofactors, Cpn10 and Cpn20, of green algae and plants function as hetero-oligomeric ring complexes. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 20471–20481 (2012).
pubmed: 22518837 pmcid: 3370230 doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.365411
Schroda, M. The Chlamydomonas genome reveals its secrets: chaperone genes and the potential roles of their gene products in the chloroplast. Photosynth. Res. 82, 221–240 (2004).
pubmed: 16143837 doi: 10.1007/s11120-004-2216-y
Bracher, A., Whitney, S. M., Hartl, F. U. & Hayer-Hartl, M. Biogenesis and metabolic maintenance of rubisco. Annu Rev. Plant Biol. 68, 29–60 (2017).
pubmed: 28125284 doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-043015-111633
Weiss, C., Bonshtien, A., Farchi-Pisanty, O., Vitlin, A. & Azem, A. Cpn20: Siamese twins of the chaperonin world. Plant Mol. Biol. 69, 227 (2009).
pubmed: 19031045 doi: 10.1007/s11103-008-9432-3
Koumoto, Y., Shimada, T., Kondo, M., Hara-Nishimura, I. & Nishimura, M. Chloroplasts have a novel Cpn10 in addition to Cpn20 as co-chaperonins in Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 29688–29694 (2001).
pubmed: 11402030 doi: 10.1074/jbc.M102330200
Rizzolo, K. et al. Functional cooperativity between the trigger factor chaperone and the ClpXP proteolytic complex. Nat. Commun. 12, 281 (2021).
pubmed: 33436616 pmcid: 7804408 doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20553-x
Kim, J. et al. Modified Clp protease complex in the ClpP3 null mutant and consequences for chloroplast development and function in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 162, 157–179 (2013).
pubmed: 23548781 pmcid: 3641200 doi: 10.1104/pp.113.215699
Olinares, P. D., Kim, J. & van Wijk, K. J. The Clp protease system; a central component of the chloroplast protease network. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1807, 999–1011 (2011).
pubmed: 21167127 doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2010.12.003
Gallastegui, N. & Groll, M. The 26S proteasome: assembly and function of a destructive machine. Trends Biochem. Sci. 35, 634–642 (2010).
pubmed: 20541423 doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2010.05.005
Maurizi, M. R., Thompson, M. W., Singh, S. K. & Kim, S.-H. in Methods in Enzymology Vol. 244 (ed. Barrett, A. J.) 314–331 (Academic Press, 1994).
Derrien, B. & Vallon, O. One-step affinity purification of the chloroplast ClpP complex from the green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii using the strep-tagII epitope tag. Bio-Protoc. 3, e315 (2013).
doi: 10.21769/BioProtoc.315
Bai, C. et al. Protomer roles in chloroplast chaperonin assembly and function. Mol. Plant 8, 1478–1492 (2015).
pubmed: 26057234 doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2015.06.002
Mastronarde, D. N. Automated electron microscope tomography using robust prediction of specimen movements. J. Struct. Biol. 152, 36–51 (2005).
pubmed: 16182563 doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2005.07.007
Rohou, A. & Grigorieff, N. CTFFIND4: fast and accurate defocus estimation from electron micrographs. J. Struct. Biol. 192, 216–221 (2015).
pubmed: 26278980 pmcid: 6760662 doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2015.08.008
Scheres, S. H. RELION: implementation of a Bayesian approach to cryo-EM structure determination. J. Struct. Biol. 180, 519–530 (2012).
pubmed: 23000701 pmcid: 3690530 doi: 10.1016/j.jsb.2012.09.006
Zheng, S. Q. et al. MotionCor2: anisotropic correction of beam-induced motion for improved cryo-electron microscopy. Nat. Methods 14, 331–332 (2017).
pubmed: 28250466 pmcid: 5494038 doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4193
Pettersen, E. F. et al. UCSF Chimera—a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1605–1612 (2004).
doi: 10.1002/jcc.20084
Raman, S. et al. Structure prediction for CASP8 with all-atom refinement using Rosetta. Proteins 77, 89–99 (2009).
pubmed: 19701941 pmcid: 3688471 doi: 10.1002/prot.22540
Song, Y. et al. High-resolution comparative modeling with RosettaCM. Structure 21, 1735–1742 (2013).
pubmed: 24035711 doi: 10.1016/j.str.2013.08.005
Adams, P. D. et al. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 213–221 (2010).
pubmed: 20124702 pmcid: 2815670 doi: 10.1107/S0907444909052925
Frenz, B., Walls, A. C., Egelman, E. H., Veesler, D. & DiMaio, F. RosettaES: a sampling strategy enabling automated interpretation of difficult cryo-EM maps. Nat. Methods 14, 797–800 (2017).
pubmed: 28628127 pmcid: 6009829 doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4340
Wang, R. Y.-R. et al. De novo protein structure determination from near-atomic-resolution cryo-EM maps. Nat. Methods 12, 335–338 (2015).
pubmed: 25707029 pmcid: 4435692 doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3287
Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G. & Cowtan, K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr. D 66, 486–501 (2010).
pubmed: 20383002 pmcid: 2852313 doi: 10.1107/S0907444910007493
Williams, C. J. et al. MolProbity: more and better reference data for improved all-atom structure validation. Protein Sci. 27, 293–315 (2018).
pubmed: 29067766 doi: 10.1002/pro.3330
DeLano, W. L. Pymol: an open-source molecular graphics tool. CCP4 Newsl. Protein Crystallogr. 40, 82–92 (2002).

Auteurs

Ning Wang (N)

State Key Laboratory of Plant Cell and Chromosome Engineering, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, The Innovative Academy of Seed Design, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
College of Advanced Agricultural Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.

Yifan Wang (Y)

College of Advanced Agricultural Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
State Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology, National Center for Protein Science Shanghai, Shanghai Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Center for Excellence in Molecular Cell Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Shanghai Science Research Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China.

Qian Zhao (Q)

State Key Laboratory of Plant Cell and Chromosome Engineering, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, The Innovative Academy of Seed Design, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.

Xiang Zhang (X)

State Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology, National Center for Protein Science Shanghai, Shanghai Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Center for Excellence in Molecular Cell Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Shanghai Science Research Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China.

Chao Peng (C)

National Facility for Protein Science in Shanghai, Zhangjiang Lab, Shanghai Advanced Research Institute, CAS, Shanghai, China.

Wenjuan Zhang (W)

State Key Laboratory of Plant Cell and Chromosome Engineering, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, The Innovative Academy of Seed Design, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
College of Advanced Agricultural Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.

Yanan Liu (Y)

State Key Laboratory of Plant Cell and Chromosome Engineering, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, The Innovative Academy of Seed Design, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
College of Advanced Agricultural Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.

Olivier Vallon (O)

Institut de Biologie Physico-Chimique, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France.

Michael Schroda (M)

Molecular Biotechnology & Systems Biology, TU Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, Germany.

Yao Cong (Y)

State Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology, National Center for Protein Science Shanghai, Shanghai Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Center for Excellence in Molecular Cell Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China. cong@sibcb.ac.cn.
Shanghai Science Research Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China. cong@sibcb.ac.cn.

Cuimin Liu (C)

State Key Laboratory of Plant Cell and Chromosome Engineering, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, The Innovative Academy of Seed Design, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. cmliu@genetics.ac.cn.
College of Advanced Agricultural Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. cmliu@genetics.ac.cn.

Articles similaires

Photosynthesis Ribulose-Bisphosphate Carboxylase Carbon Dioxide Molecular Dynamics Simulation Cyanobacteria
Cryoelectron Microscopy Algorithms Image Processing, Computer-Assisted Consensus Software

Amyloid accelerator polyphosphate fits as the mystery density in α-synuclein fibrils.

Philipp Huettemann, Pavithra Mahadevan, Justine Lempart et al.
1.00
Polyphosphates alpha-Synuclein Humans Amyloid Molecular Dynamics Simulation

Structural basis for molecular assembly of fucoxanthin chlorophyll

Koji Kato, Yoshiki Nakajima, Jian Xing et al.
1.00
Diatoms Photosystem I Protein Complex Chlorophyll Binding Proteins Cryoelectron Microscopy Light-Harvesting Protein Complexes

Classifications MeSH