Clinical Trial Protocol for HyNOVA: Hyperthermic and Normothermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy following interval cytoreductive surgery for stage III epithelial OVArian, fallopian tube and primary peritoneal cancer (ANZGOG1901/2020).
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
/ therapeutic use
Australia
Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic
Combined Modality Therapy
Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures
Fallopian Tubes
Female
Humans
Hyperthermia, Induced
Ovarian Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Peritoneal Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Chemotherapy
Hyperthermia
Ovarian Cancer
Patient Reported Outcomes
Journal
Journal of gynecologic oncology
ISSN: 2005-0399
Titre abrégé: J Gynecol Oncol
Pays: Korea (South)
ID NLM: 101483150
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2022
01 2022
Historique:
received:
17
06
2021
revised:
17
08
2021
accepted:
05
10
2021
pubmed:
17
11
2021
medline:
29
1
2022
entrez:
16
11
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Ovarian cancer is the most lethal gynecological cancer, causing over 200,000 deaths worldwide in 2020. Initial standard treatment for primary ovarian cancer is optimal cytoreductive surgery (CRS) preceded and/or followed by intravenous platinum-based chemotherapy. However, most women develop recurrence within the peritoneal cavity and die of disease. Results of the OVIHIPEC 1 trial (2018) showed improved survival of 34% when hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) was given immediately following interval-CRS in women with stage III disease. However, it is unknown if the effect of HIPEC is due to hyperthermia, one extra cycle of intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy, or other factors. There is also concern that hyperthermia might be associated with an increase in adverse events (AEs) due to a heightened systemic inflammatory response. HyNOVA is a seamless, multi-stage randomized study that attempts to answer these questions by comparing HIPEC to normothermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (NIPEC), focusing on safety (stage 1), then assessing activity (stage 2) and effectiveness (stage 3). In this initial study, we hypothesize that NIPEC will result in a lower rate of severe AEs compared to HIPEC. This initial stage of HyNOVA is a phase II study of 80 women with International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics stage III epithelial ovarian cancer, with at least stable disease following 3-4 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, achieving interval-CRS to <2.5 mm residual disease. Participants are randomized 1:1 to receive IP cisplatin 100 mg/m² for 90 minutes either as HIPEC, heated to 42°C (41.5°C-42.5°C), or NIPEC, at 37°C (36.5°C-37.5°C). The primary outcome is the proportion of AEs ≥ grade 3 occurring within 90 days. Secondary outcomes are AE of interest, surgical morbidity, patient reported outcomes, resource allocation, feasibility, progression-free survival and overall survival. AEs are measured using both CTCAE v5.0 and Clavien-Dindo classification, particularly infection, pain, bowel dysfunction, and anemia. Tertiary outcomes are potential predictive biomarkers measured before and after HIPEC/NIPEC including circulating cell-free tumor DNA, tissue factors, and systemic inflammatory markers. There are 4 participating Australian sites with experience in CRS and HIPEC for peritoneal malignancy. HyNOVA is funded by an MRFF grant (APP1199155). ANZCTR Identifier: ACTRN12621000269831.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Ovarian cancer is the most lethal gynecological cancer, causing over 200,000 deaths worldwide in 2020. Initial standard treatment for primary ovarian cancer is optimal cytoreductive surgery (CRS) preceded and/or followed by intravenous platinum-based chemotherapy. However, most women develop recurrence within the peritoneal cavity and die of disease. Results of the OVIHIPEC 1 trial (2018) showed improved survival of 34% when hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) was given immediately following interval-CRS in women with stage III disease. However, it is unknown if the effect of HIPEC is due to hyperthermia, one extra cycle of intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy, or other factors. There is also concern that hyperthermia might be associated with an increase in adverse events (AEs) due to a heightened systemic inflammatory response. HyNOVA is a seamless, multi-stage randomized study that attempts to answer these questions by comparing HIPEC to normothermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (NIPEC), focusing on safety (stage 1), then assessing activity (stage 2) and effectiveness (stage 3). In this initial study, we hypothesize that NIPEC will result in a lower rate of severe AEs compared to HIPEC.
METHODS
This initial stage of HyNOVA is a phase II study of 80 women with International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics stage III epithelial ovarian cancer, with at least stable disease following 3-4 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, achieving interval-CRS to <2.5 mm residual disease. Participants are randomized 1:1 to receive IP cisplatin 100 mg/m² for 90 minutes either as HIPEC, heated to 42°C (41.5°C-42.5°C), or NIPEC, at 37°C (36.5°C-37.5°C). The primary outcome is the proportion of AEs ≥ grade 3 occurring within 90 days. Secondary outcomes are AE of interest, surgical morbidity, patient reported outcomes, resource allocation, feasibility, progression-free survival and overall survival. AEs are measured using both CTCAE v5.0 and Clavien-Dindo classification, particularly infection, pain, bowel dysfunction, and anemia. Tertiary outcomes are potential predictive biomarkers measured before and after HIPEC/NIPEC including circulating cell-free tumor DNA, tissue factors, and systemic inflammatory markers. There are 4 participating Australian sites with experience in CRS and HIPEC for peritoneal malignancy. HyNOVA is funded by an MRFF grant (APP1199155).
TRIAL REGISTRATION
ANZCTR Identifier: ACTRN12621000269831.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34783204
pii: 33.e1
doi: 10.3802/jgo.2022.33.e1
pmc: PMC8728663
doi:
Banques de données
ANZCTR
['ACTRN12621000269831']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial Protocol
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e1Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022. Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology, Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology, and Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Références
Lancet Oncol. 2021 Feb;22(2):256-266
pubmed: 33476595
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2016 Jul;42(7):1035-41
pubmed: 27132072
N Engl J Med. 2018 Jan 18;378(3):230-240
pubmed: 29342393
N Engl J Med. 1996 Dec 26;335(26):1950-5
pubmed: 8960474
Qual Life Res. 2011 Dec;20(10):1727-36
pubmed: 21479777
Qual Life Res. 2018 Jan;27(1):59-74
pubmed: 29248998
Radiat Oncol. 2015 Aug 07;10:165
pubmed: 26245485
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1990;25(6):389-94
pubmed: 2311166
Neoplasia. 2004 Mar-Apr;6(2):117-27
pubmed: 15140400
Pharmacoeconomics. 2018 Feb;36(2):225-238
pubmed: 29270835
Med J Aust. 2014 Sep 1;201(5):283-8
pubmed: 25163381
Eur J Cancer. 1998 Jan;34(1):148-54
pubmed: 9624250
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993 Mar 3;85(5):365-76
pubmed: 8433390
Int J Cancer. 2021 Apr 5;:
pubmed: 33818764
J Gynecol Oncol. 2015 Apr;26(2):87-9
pubmed: 25872889
Eur J Cancer. 2003 Jul;39(10):1402-8
pubmed: 12826043
Minerva Anestesiol. 2016 Mar;82(3):310-9
pubmed: 26184701
Cancer J. 2009 May-Jun;15(3):216-24
pubmed: 19556908