The Baby's First Bites RCT: Evaluating a Vegetable-Exposure and a Sensitive-Feeding Intervention in Terms of Child Health Outcomes and Maternal Feeding Behavior During Toddlerhood.

child complementary feeding infant repeated exposure responsive feeding self-regulation of energy intake sensitive feeding toddler vegetables

Journal

The Journal of nutrition
ISSN: 1541-6100
Titre abrégé: J Nutr
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0404243

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
08 02 2022
Historique:
received: 17 06 2021
revised: 21 09 2021
accepted: 05 11 2021
pubmed: 19 11 2021
medline: 22 2 2022
entrez: 18 11 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Parenting interventions during the first years of life on what and/or how to feed infants during complementary feeding can promote healthy eating habits. An intervention promoting repeated exposure to a variety of vegetables [repeated vegetable exposure (RVE); what] and an intervention promoting responding sensitively to child signals during mealtime [video-feedback intervention to promote positive parenting-feeding infants (VIPP-FI); how] were compared, separately and combined (COMBI), with an attention control condition (AC). Primary outcomes were vegetable consumption and self-regulation of energy intake; secondary outcomes were child anthropometrics and maternal feeding practices (sensitive feeding, pressure to eat). Our 4-arm randomized controlled trial included 246 first-time Dutch mothers and their infants. Interventions started when infants were 4-6 mo old and ended at age 16 mo. The present study evaluated effects at 18 (t18) and 24 (t24) mo of age. Vegetable acceptance was assessed using three 24-h dietary recalls, self-regulation of energy intake by an eating-in-the-absence-of-hunger experiment and mother-report, and maternal feeding behavior by observation and mother-report. Linear mixed model and ANOVA analyses revealed no follow-up group differences regarding child vegetable intake or self-regulatory behavior. The proportion of children with overweight was significantly lower in the COMBI group, compared with the VIPP-FI group at t18 (2% compared with 16%), and with the AC group at t24 (7% compared with 20%), although this finding needs to be interpreted cautiously due to the small number of infants with overweight and nonsignificant effects on the continuous BMI z-score measure (P values: 0.29-0.82). Finally, more sensitive feeding behavior and less pressure to eat was found in the VIPP-FI and COMBI groups, compared with the RVE and AC groups, mostly at t18 (significant effect sizes: d = 0.23-0.64). Interventions were not effective in increasing vegetable intake or self-regulation of energy intake. Future research might usefully focus on risk groups such as families who already experience problems around feeding.This trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03348176.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Parenting interventions during the first years of life on what and/or how to feed infants during complementary feeding can promote healthy eating habits.
OBJECTIVES
An intervention promoting repeated exposure to a variety of vegetables [repeated vegetable exposure (RVE); what] and an intervention promoting responding sensitively to child signals during mealtime [video-feedback intervention to promote positive parenting-feeding infants (VIPP-FI); how] were compared, separately and combined (COMBI), with an attention control condition (AC). Primary outcomes were vegetable consumption and self-regulation of energy intake; secondary outcomes were child anthropometrics and maternal feeding practices (sensitive feeding, pressure to eat).
METHODS
Our 4-arm randomized controlled trial included 246 first-time Dutch mothers and their infants. Interventions started when infants were 4-6 mo old and ended at age 16 mo. The present study evaluated effects at 18 (t18) and 24 (t24) mo of age. Vegetable acceptance was assessed using three 24-h dietary recalls, self-regulation of energy intake by an eating-in-the-absence-of-hunger experiment and mother-report, and maternal feeding behavior by observation and mother-report.
RESULTS
Linear mixed model and ANOVA analyses revealed no follow-up group differences regarding child vegetable intake or self-regulatory behavior. The proportion of children with overweight was significantly lower in the COMBI group, compared with the VIPP-FI group at t18 (2% compared with 16%), and with the AC group at t24 (7% compared with 20%), although this finding needs to be interpreted cautiously due to the small number of infants with overweight and nonsignificant effects on the continuous BMI z-score measure (P values: 0.29-0.82). Finally, more sensitive feeding behavior and less pressure to eat was found in the VIPP-FI and COMBI groups, compared with the RVE and AC groups, mostly at t18 (significant effect sizes: d = 0.23-0.64).
CONCLUSIONS
Interventions were not effective in increasing vegetable intake or self-regulation of energy intake. Future research might usefully focus on risk groups such as families who already experience problems around feeding.This trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03348176.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34791320
pii: S0022-3166(22)00528-4
doi: 10.1093/jn/nxab387
pmc: PMC8826930
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03348176']

Types de publication

Journal Article Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

386-398

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society for Nutrition.

Références

Appetite. 2014 Oct;81:193-9
pubmed: 24973508
PLoS One. 2014 May 30;9(5):e97609
pubmed: 24878745
Curr Obes Rep. 2015 Sep;4(3):363-70
pubmed: 26627494
Infant Behav Dev. 2006 Jul;29(3):386-401
pubmed: 17138293
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2008 Oct 20;5:49
pubmed: 18937832
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018 Jul 9;15(1):64
pubmed: 29986721
Appetite. 2021 Oct 1;165:105316
pubmed: 34023447
J Nutr Sci. 2017 Sep 19;6:e49
pubmed: 29152253
Appetite. 2014 Sep;80:154-60
pubmed: 24814221
Appetite. 2020 Dec 1;155:104830
pubmed: 32814120
Int J Obes (Lond). 2010 Jul;34(7):1116-24
pubmed: 20195285
Appetite. 2007 Jan;48(1):104-13
pubmed: 16962207
BMC Med. 2013 Mar 27;11:84
pubmed: 23531230
J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2010 Sep;23(9):943-51
pubmed: 21175095
Appetite. 1999 Jun;32(3):405-19
pubmed: 10336797
Appetite. 2009 Oct;53(2):210-21
pubmed: 19576254
BMJ. 2000 May 6;320(7244):1240-3
pubmed: 10797032
Pediatr Res. 2005 Aug;58(2):243-7
pubmed: 16055935
Pediatr Obes. 2021 Apr;16(4):e12736
pubmed: 33021348
Int J Epidemiol. 2017 Jun 1;46(3):1029-1056
pubmed: 28338764
Appetite. 2011 Oct;57(2):388-96
pubmed: 21672566
J Pers Assess. 2014;96(4):445-58
pubmed: 24206185
Pediatr Obes. 2021 Jun;16(6):e12756
pubmed: 33225624
N Engl J Med. 1997 Sep 25;337(13):869-73
pubmed: 9302300
Clin Cancer Res. 2008 Jul 15;14(14):4368-71
pubmed: 18628449
Appetite. 2006 May;46(3):318-23
pubmed: 16626838
Am J Clin Nutr. 2010 May;91(5):1172-9
pubmed: 20335548
J Am Diet Assoc. 2006 Jan;106(1 Suppl 1):S77-83
pubmed: 16376632
Appetite. 2013 Jun;65:210-9
pubmed: 23419965
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 11;11(3):e0151356
pubmed: 26968029
Pediatr Obes. 2021 Nov;16(11):e12800
pubmed: 33978315
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2001 Oct;42(7):963-70
pubmed: 11693591
JAMA Pediatr. 2017 Sep 1;171(9):838-846
pubmed: 28692728
Am J Clin Nutr. 2012 Mar;95(3):633-9
pubmed: 22277555
BMJ. 2010 Aug 18;341:c4229
pubmed: 20724400
J Nutr. 2011 Mar;141(3):495-501
pubmed: 21270360
Appetite. 1992 Oct;19(2):105-20
pubmed: 1489209
Appetite. 1994 Oct;23(2):147-63
pubmed: 7864609
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2016 Jul;24(7):1537-45
pubmed: 27193736
JAMA. 2018 Aug 7;320(5):461-468
pubmed: 30088009
Appetite. 2019 Jun 1;137:174-197
pubmed: 30794819
BMC Pediatr. 2014 Jul 18;14:184
pubmed: 25037579
J Law Med Ethics. 2007 Spring;35(1):22-34
pubmed: 17341215
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2017 Jan;25(1):185-191
pubmed: 28008749
BMC Public Health. 2009 Oct 14;9:387
pubmed: 19825193
Int J Obes (Lond). 2012 Oct;36(10):1292-8
pubmed: 22710926
JAMA Pediatr. 2016 Aug 1;170(8):742-9
pubmed: 27271455
BMC Pediatr. 2019 Aug 1;19(1):266
pubmed: 31370830
N Engl J Med. 2002 Mar 14;346(11):802-10
pubmed: 11893791
Behav Genet. 2016 Nov;46(6):763-771
pubmed: 27406596
Int J Obes (Lond). 2011 Apr;35(4):480-92
pubmed: 21427696

Auteurs

Merel S van Vliet (MS)

Institute of Education and Child Studies, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Janneke M Schultink (JM)

Division of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

Gerry Jager (G)

Division of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

Jeanne H M de Vries (JHM)

Division of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

Judi Mesman (J)

Institute of Education and Child Studies, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Cees de Graaf (C)

Division of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

Carel M J L Vereijken (CMJL)

Danone Nutricia Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Hugo Weenen (H)

Danone Nutricia Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Victoire W T de Wild (VWT)

Division of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

Vanessa E G Martens (VEG)

Danone Nutricia Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Hovannouhi Houniet (H)

Nutricia Nederland B.V., Zoetermeer, The Netherlands.

Shelley M C van der Veek (SMC)

Institute of Education and Child Studies, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH