Evaluation of an Artificial Intelligence-Augmented Digital System for Histologic Classification of Colorectal Polyps.
Journal
JAMA network open
ISSN: 2574-3805
Titre abrégé: JAMA Netw Open
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101729235
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 11 2021
01 11 2021
Historique:
entrez:
18
11
2021
pubmed:
19
11
2021
medline:
18
1
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Colorectal polyps are common, and their histopathologic classification is used in the planning of follow-up surveillance. Substantial variation has been observed in pathologists' classification of colorectal polyps, and improved assessment by pathologists may be associated with reduced subsequent underuse and overuse of colonoscopy. To compare standard microscopic assessment with an artificial intelligence (AI)-augmented digital system that annotates regions of interest within digitized polyp tissue and predicts polyp type using a deep learning model to assist pathologists in colorectal polyp classification. In this diagnostic study conducted at a tertiary academic medical center and a community hospital in New Hampshire, 100 slides with colorectal polyp samples were read by 15 pathologists using a microscope and an AI-augmented digital system, with a washout period of at least 12 weeks between use of each modality. The study was conducted from February 10 to July 10, 2020. Accuracy and time of evaluation were used to compare pathologists' performance when a microscope was used with their performance when the AI-augmented digital system was used. Outcomes were compared using paired t tests and mixed-effects models. In assessments of 100 slides with colorectal polyp specimens, use of the AI-augmented digital system significantly improved pathologists' classification accuracy compared with microscopic assessment from 73.9% (95% CI, 71.7%-76.2%) to 80.8% (95% CI, 78.8%-82.8%) (P < .001). The overall difference in the evaluation time per slide between the digital system (mean, 21.7 seconds; 95% CI, 20.8-22.7 seconds) and microscopic examination (mean, 13.0 seconds; 95% CI, 12.4-13.5 seconds) was -8.8 seconds (95% CI, -9.8 to -7.7 seconds), but this difference decreased as pathologists became more familiar and experienced with the digital system; the difference between the time of evaluation on the last set of 20 slides for all pathologists when using the microscope and the digital system was 4.8 seconds (95% CI, 3.0-6.5 seconds). In this diagnostic study, an AI-augmented digital system significantly improved the accuracy of pathologic interpretation of colorectal polyps compared with microscopic assessment. If applied broadly to clinical practice, this tool may be associated with decreases in subsequent overuse and underuse of colonoscopy and thus with improved patient outcomes and reduced health care costs.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34792588
pii: 2786291
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.35271
pmc: PMC8603082
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e2135271Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P30 CA023108
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA249758
Pays : United States
Organisme : NLM NIH HHS
ID : R01 LM012837
Pays : United States
Références
Ann Intern Med. 2004 Aug 17;141(4):264-71
pubmed: 15313742
J Pathol Inform. 2017 Jul 25;8:30
pubmed: 28828201
Am J Surg Pathol. 2013 Mar;37(3):427-33
pubmed: 23348206
Dig Dis Sci. 2011 Sep;56(9):2623-30
pubmed: 21698368
Gastroenterology. 2015 Oct;149(4):938-51
pubmed: 26122143
Histopathology. 2013 May;62(6):916-24
pubmed: 23611360
Nat Med. 2020 Jun;26(6):900-908
pubmed: 32424212
Acad Pathol. 2018 Mar 28;5:2374289518765457
pubmed: 29623293
Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 Mar;104(3):739-50
pubmed: 19240699
Histopathology. 2012 Jul;61(1):47-52
pubmed: 22486166
Gastroenterology. 2021 Jan;160(1):452-454.e1
pubmed: 32950521
J Clin Epidemiol. 2003 Mar;56(3):209-14
pubmed: 12725874
Am J Surg Pathol. 2018 Dec;42(12):1636-1646
pubmed: 30312179
Gastroenterology. 2020 Mar;158(4):1131-1153.e5
pubmed: 32044092
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 29;11(1):7080
pubmed: 33782535
Am J Gastroenterol. 2010 Jun;105(6):1301-7
pubmed: 20179689
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Apr 1;3(4):e203398
pubmed: 32324237
Nat Med. 2018 Oct;24(10):1559-1567
pubmed: 30224757
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2019 Sep;3:1-9
pubmed: 31577448
Histopathology. 2011 May;58(6):974-81
pubmed: 21585430
Dig Liver Dis. 2013 Dec;45(12):1049-55
pubmed: 23871251
Sci Rep. 2019 Mar 4;9(1):3358
pubmed: 30833650
Nat Med. 2019 Aug;25(8):1301-1309
pubmed: 31308507
Am J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jan;110(1):72-90
pubmed: 25448873
J Clin Pathol. 2014 Sep;67(9):781-6
pubmed: 25004943
Cancer. 2016 Aug 15;122(16):2479-86
pubmed: 27200481
NPJ Digit Med. 2020 Feb 26;3:23
pubmed: 32140566