Saroglitazar and Hepano treatment offers protection against high fat high fructose diet induced obesity, insulin resistance and steatosis by modulating various class of hepatic and circulating lipids.
Animals
Cell Line
Diet
Diet, High-Fat
Fatty Liver
/ etiology
Fructose
/ adverse effects
Humans
Hypolipidemic Agents
/ therapeutic use
Insulin Resistance
Lipid Metabolism
/ drug effects
Lipidomics
Lipids
/ blood
Liver
/ drug effects
Male
Mice
Mice, Inbred C57BL
Obesity
/ etiology
Phenylpropionates
/ therapeutic use
Pyrroles
/ therapeutic use
Hepano
High fat high fructose
Insulin resistance
Lipidomics
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease
Saroglitazar
Journal
Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie
ISSN: 1950-6007
Titre abrégé: Biomed Pharmacother
Pays: France
ID NLM: 8213295
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2021
Dec 2021
Historique:
received:
16
08
2021
revised:
13
10
2021
accepted:
19
10
2021
entrez:
19
11
2021
pubmed:
20
11
2021
medline:
15
12
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Higher global prevalence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is associated with obesity, steatosis, and insulin resistance (IR), and often progresses to steatohepatitis (NASH). Even after more than twenty years of research, there is still no FDA approved therapy for the treatment of fatty liver disease/NASH though, Saroglitazar - a dual PPAR α/γ agonist has been recently approved as a therapeutic option for the fatty liver disease in India. Hepatoprotective Ayurvedic formulations are widely used and are considered safe. In the present study, C57BL/6 male mice on HFHF diet for four weeks were treated with vehicle, Saroglitazar (3 mg/kg/po), and Hepano - a formulation of five herbs (200 mg/kg/po), at the human equivalent therapeutic doses for additional eight weeks. These animals were evaluated after 12 weeks for obesity, body mass index (BMI), systemic insulin resistance, hyperglycaemia, dyslipidaemia, and hepatic lipid accumulation. Differential liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) based lipidomics analysis demonstrated significant changes in the different class of lipids [phospholipids, sphingolipids, diglycerides and triglycerides (TG)] in HFHF fed group. The protective effects of both Saroglitazar and Hepano were evident against IR, obesity and in the modulation of different class of lipids in the circulation and hepatic tissue. Saroglitazar reduced TG as well as modulated phospholipids levels, while Hepano modulated only phospholipids, ceramides, oxidised lipids, and had no effect on hepatic or circulating TG levels in HFHF fed mice. In addition, in vitro studies using HepG2, THP1 and LX2 cells demonstrated safety of both the test substances where Hepano possess better anti-inflammatory as well as anti-fibrotic potential. Overall, Saroglitazar seems to be more efficacious than Hepano in the regimen used against HFHF induced IR, obesity, and dyslipidaemia.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34794234
pii: S0753-3322(21)01141-0
doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2021.112357
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Hypolipidemic Agents
0
Lipids
0
Phenylpropionates
0
Pyrroles
0
Fructose
30237-26-4
saroglitazar
E0YMX3S4JD
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
112357Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.