The genetic architecture of DNA replication timing in human pluripotent stem cells.


Journal

Nature communications
ISSN: 2041-1723
Titre abrégé: Nat Commun
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101528555

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
19 11 2021
Historique:
received: 17 08 2021
accepted: 29 10 2021
entrez: 20 11 2021
pubmed: 21 11 2021
medline: 24 12 2021
Statut: epublish

Résumé

DNA replication follows a strict spatiotemporal program that intersects with chromatin structure but has a poorly understood genetic basis. To systematically identify genetic regulators of replication timing, we exploited inter-individual variation in human pluripotent stem cells from 349 individuals. We show that the human genome's replication program is broadly encoded in DNA and identify 1,617 cis-acting replication timing quantitative trait loci (rtQTLs) - sequence determinants of replication initiation. rtQTLs function individually, or in combinations of proximal and distal regulators, and are enriched at sites of histone H3 trimethylation of lysines 4, 9, and 36 together with histone hyperacetylation. H3 trimethylation marks are individually repressive yet synergistically associate with early replication. We identify pluripotency-related transcription factors and boundary elements as positive and negative regulators of replication timing, respectively. Taken together, human replication timing is controlled by a multi-layered mechanism with dozens of effectors working combinatorially and following principles analogous to transcription regulation.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34799581
doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-27115-9
pii: 10.1038/s41467-021-27115-9
pmc: PMC8604924
doi:

Substances chimiques

Histones 0
Transcription Factors 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Observational Study Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

6746

Subventions

Organisme : Wellcome Trust
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : DP2 GM123495
Pays : United States
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/R015724/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
ID : 211221/Z/18/Z
Pays : United Kingdom

Informations de copyright

© 2021. The Author(s).

Références

Prioleau, M.-N. & MacAlpine, D. M. DNA replication origins—where do we begin? Genes Dev. 30, 1683–1697 (2016).
pubmed: 27542827 pmcid: 5002974 doi: 10.1101/gad.285114.116
Hamlin, J. L., Mesner, L. D. & Dijkwel, P. A. A winding road to origin discovery. Chromosome Res 18, 45–61 (2010).
pubmed: 19859818 pmcid: 2904547 doi: 10.1007/s10577-009-9089-z
Aladjem, M. I. & Redon, C. E. Order from clutter: selective interactions at mammalian replication origins. Nat. Rev. Genet. 18, 101 (2016).
pubmed: 27867195 pmcid: 6596300 doi: 10.1038/nrg.2016.141
Forrester, W. C. et al. A deletion of the human beta-globin locus activation region causes a major alteration in chromatin structure and replication across the entire beta-globin locus. Genes Dev. 4, 1637–1649 (1990).
pubmed: 2249769 doi: 10.1101/gad.4.10.1637
Liu, G., Malott, M. & Leffak, M. Multiple Functional Elements Comprise a Mammalian Chromosomal Replicator. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23, 1832 (2003).
pubmed: 12589000 pmcid: 151694 doi: 10.1128/MCB.23.5.1832-1842.2003
Aladjem, M. I., Rodewald, L. W., Kolman, J. L. & Wahl, G. M. Genetic Dissection of a Mammalian Replicator in the Human β-Globin Locus. Science 281, 1005 (1998).
pubmed: 9703500 doi: 10.1126/science.281.5379.1005
Altman, A. L. & Fanning, E. The Chinese Hamster Dihydrofolate Reductase Replication Origin Beta Is Active at Multiple Ectopic Chromosomal Locations and Requires Specific DNA Sequence Elements for Activity. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21, 1098 (2001).
pubmed: 11158297 pmcid: 99564 doi: 10.1128/MCB.21.4.1098-1110.2001
Aladjem, M. I. et al. Participation of the Human β-Globin Locus Control Region in Initiation of DNA Replication. Science 270, 815 (1995).
pubmed: 7481774 doi: 10.1126/science.270.5237.815
Kalejta, R. F. et al. Distal Sequences, but Not ori-β/OBR-1, Are Essential for Initiation of DNA Replication in the Chinese Hamster DHFR Origin. Mol. Cell 2, 797–806 (1998).
pubmed: 9885567 doi: 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80294-4
Wang, L. et al. The Human β-Globin Replication Initiation Region Consists of Two Modular Independent Replicators. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24, 3373 (2004).
pubmed: 15060158 pmcid: 381644 doi: 10.1128/MCB.24.8.3373-3386.2004
Sima, J. et al. Identifying cis Elements for Spatiotemporal Control of Mammalian DNA Replication. Cell 176, 1–15 (2019).
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.11.036
Conner, A. L. & Aladjem, M. I. The chromatin backdrop of DNA replication: Lessons from genetics and genome-scale analyses. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1819, 794–801 (2012).
pubmed: 22342530 pmcid: 3371190 doi: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2012.01.017
Sansam, C. G. et al. A mechanism for epigenetic control of DNA replication. Genes Dev. 32, 224–229 (2018).
pubmed: 29483155 pmcid: 5859964 doi: 10.1101/gad.306464.117
Goren, A., Tabib, A., Hecht, M. & Cedar, H. DNA replication timing of the human beta-globin domain is controlled by histone modification at the origin. Genes Dev. 22, 1319–1324 (2008).
pubmed: 18443145 pmcid: 2377185 doi: 10.1101/gad.468308
Aggarwal, B. D. & Calvi, B. R. Chromatin regulates origin activity in Drosophila follicle cells. Nature 430, 372–376 (2004).
pubmed: 15254542 doi: 10.1038/nature02694
Vogelauer, M., Rubbi, L., Lucas, I., Brewer, B. J. & Grunstein, M. Histone Acetylation Regulates the Time of Replication Origin Firing. Mol. Cell 10, 1223–1233 (2002).
pubmed: 12453428 doi: 10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00702-5
Rizzardi, L. F., Dorn, E. S., Strahl, B. D. & Cook, J. G. DNA Replication Origin Function Is Promoted by H3K4 Di-methylation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 192, 371 (2012).
pubmed: 22851644 pmcid: 3454870 doi: 10.1534/genetics.112.142349
Koren, A. et al. Genetic variation in human DNA replication timing. Cell 159, 1015–1026 (2014).
pubmed: 25416942 pmcid: 4359889 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.10.025
Merkle, F. T. et al. Biological insights from the whole genome analysis of human embryonic stem cells. bioRxiv, 2020.2010.2026.337352, https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.26.337352 (2020).
Kilpinen, H. et al. Common genetic variation drives molecular heterogeneity in human iPSCs. Nature 546, 370–375 (2017).
pubmed: 28489815 pmcid: 5524171 doi: 10.1038/nature22403
Zhao, P. A., Sasaki, T. & Gilbert, D. M. High-resolution Repli-Seq defines the temporal choreography of initiation, elongation and termination of replication in mammalian cells. Genome Biol. 21, 76 (2020).
pubmed: 32209126 pmcid: 7092589 doi: 10.1186/s13059-020-01983-8
Hormozdiari, F., Kostem, E., Kang, E. Y., Pasaniuc, B. & Eskin, E. Identifying causal variants at loci with multiple signals of association. Genetics 198, 497–508 (2014).
pubmed: 25104515 pmcid: 4196608 doi: 10.1534/genetics.114.167908
Gerhardt, J. et al. Cis-acting DNA sequence at a replication origin promotes repeat expansion to fragile X full mutation. J. Cell Biol. 206, 599–607 (2014).
pubmed: 25179629 pmcid: 4151148 doi: 10.1083/jcb.201404157
GTEx Consortium. Genetic effects on gene expression across human tissues. Nature 550, 204–213 (2017).
pmcid: 5776756 doi: 10.1038/nature24277
Long, H. et al. H2A.Z facilitates licensing and activation of early replication origins. Nature 577, 576–581 (2020).
pubmed: 31875854 doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1877-9
Vakoc, C. R., Mandat, S. A., Olenchock, B. A. & Blobel, G. A. Histone H3 Lysine 9 Methylation and HP1gamma Are Associated with Transcription Elongation through Mammalian Chromatin. Mol. Cell 19, 381–391 (2005).
pubmed: 16061184 doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2005.06.011
Bernstein, B. E. et al. A Bivalent Chromatin Structure Marks Key Developmental Genes in Embryonic Stem Cells. Cell 125, 315–326 (2006).
pubmed: 16630819 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.02.041
Cayrou, C. et al. Genome-scale analysis of metazoan replication origins reveals their organization in specific but flexible sites defined by conserved features. Genome Res. 21, 1438–1449 (2011).
pubmed: 21750104 pmcid: 3166829 doi: 10.1101/gr.121830.111
Cayrou, C. et al. New insights into replication origin characteristics in metazoans. Cell Cycle 11, 658–667 (2012).
pubmed: 22373526 pmcid: 3318102 doi: 10.4161/cc.11.4.19097
Cayrou, C. et al. The chromatin environment shapes DNA replication origin organization and defines origin classes. Genome Res. 25, 1873–1885 (2015).
pubmed: 26560631 pmcid: 4665008 doi: 10.1101/gr.192799.115
Comoglio, F. et al. High-resolution profiling of Drosophila replication start sites reveals a DNA shape and chromatin signature of metazoan origins. Cell Rep. 11, 821–834 (2015).
pubmed: 25921534 pmcid: 4562395 doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.03.070
Black, JoshuaC. et al. KDM4A Lysine Demethylase Induces Site-Specific Copy Gain and Rereplication of Regions Amplified in Tumors. Cell 154, 541–555 (2013).
pubmed: 23871696 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.06.051
Mishra, S. et al. Cross-talk between Lysine-Modifying Enzymes Controls Site-Specific DNA Amplifications. Cell 174, 803–817 (2018).
pubmed: 30057114 pmcid: 6212369 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.06.018
Liang, Z., Diamond, M., Smith, J. A., Schnell, M. & Daniel, R. Proliferating cell nuclear antigen is required for loading of the SMCX/KMD5C histone demethylase onto chromatin. Epigenetics Chromatin. 4, 18 (2011).
pubmed: 21996408 pmcid: 3212929 doi: 10.1186/1756-8935-4-18
Rondinelli, B. et al. H3K4me3 demethylation by the histone demethylase KDM5C/JARID1C promotes DNA replication origin firing. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, 2560–2574 (2015).
pubmed: 25712104 pmcid: 4357704 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv090
Wu, R., Wang, Z., Gan, H., Zhang, H. & Zhang, Z. H3K9me3 demethylase Kdm4d facilitates the formation of pre-initiative complex and regulates DNA replication. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, 169–180 (2016).
pubmed: 27679476 pmcid: 5224507 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw848
Vermeulen, M. et al. Quantitative Interaction Proteomics and Genome-wide Profiling of Epigenetic Histone Marks and Their Readers. Cell 142, 967–980 (2010).
pubmed: 20850016 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.08.020
Casas-Delucchi, C. S. et al. Histone hypoacetylation is required to maintain late replication timing of constitutive heterochromatin. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, 159–169 (2012).
pubmed: 21908399 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr723
Iizuka, M. et al. Histone acetyltransferase Hbo1: catalytic activity, cellular abundance, and links to primary cancers. Gene 436, 108–114 (2009).
pubmed: 19393168 pmcid: 2674512 doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2009.01.020
Yan, K. et al. The Chromatin Regulator BRPF3 Preferentially Activates the HBO1 Acetyltransferase but Is Dispensable for Mouse Development and Survival. J. Biol. Chem. 291, 2647–2663 (2016).
pubmed: 26677226 doi: 10.1074/jbc.M115.703041
Miotto, B. & Struhl, K. HBO1 Histone Acetylase Activity Is Essential for DNA Replication Licensing and Inhibited by Geminin. Mol. Cell 37, 57–66 (2010).
pubmed: 20129055 pmcid: 2818871 doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.12.012
Feng, Y. et al. BRPF3-HBO1 regulates replication origin activation and histone H3K14 acetylation. EMBO J. 35, 176–192 (2016).
pubmed: 26620551 doi: 10.15252/embj.201591293
Mi, H., Muruganujan, A., Ebert, D., Huang, X. & Thomas, P. D. PANTHER version 14: more genomes, a new PANTHER GO-slim and improvements in enrichment analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, D419–D426 (2019).
pubmed: 30407594 doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1038
Gindin, Y., Valenzuela, M. S., Aladjem, M. I., Meltzer, P. S. & Bilke, S. A chromatin structure-based model accurately predicts DNA replication timing in human cells. Mol. Syst. Biol. 10, 722–722 (2014).
pubmed: 24682507 pmcid: 4017678 doi: 10.1002/msb.134859
Black, J. C. et al. Conserved Antagonism between JMJD2A/KDM4A and HP1γ during Cell Cycle Progression. Mol. Cell 40, 736–748 (2010).
pubmed: 21145482 doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.11.008
The ENCODE Project Consortium. An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature 489, 57–74 (2012).
pmcid: 3439153 doi: 10.1038/nature11247
Kasowski, M. et al. Extensive Variation in Chromatin States Across Humans. Science 342, 750–752 (2013).
pubmed: 24136358 pmcid: 4075767 doi: 10.1126/science.1242510
Eberle, M. A. et al. A reference data set of 5.4 million phased human variants validated by genetic inheritance from sequencing a three-generation 17-member pedigree. Genome Res. 27, 157–164 (2017).
pubmed: 27903644 pmcid: 5204340 doi: 10.1101/gr.210500.116
Tsankov, A. M. et al. Transcription factor binding dynamics during human ES cell differentiation. Nature 518, 344–349 (2015).
pubmed: 25693565 pmcid: 4499331 doi: 10.1038/nature14233
Khare, S. P. et al. HIstome–a relational knowledgebase of human histone proteins and histone modifying enzymes. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, D337–D342 (2012).
pubmed: 22140112 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr1125
Zhao, J., Li, X., Guo, M., Yu, J. & Yan, C. The common stress responsive transcription factor ATF3 binds genomic sites enriched with p300 and H3K27ac for transcriptional regulation. BMC Genomics 17, 335 (2016).
pubmed: 27146783 pmcid: 4857411 doi: 10.1186/s12864-016-2664-8
Hwang, J.-Y. & Zukin, R. S. REST, a master transcriptional regulator in neurodegenerative disease. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 48, 193–200 (2018).
pubmed: 29351877 pmcid: 5892838 doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2017.12.008
Bailey, S. D. et al. ZNF143 provides sequence specificity to secure chromatin interactions at gene promoters. Nat. Commun. 6, 6186 (2015).
pmcid: 4431651 doi: 10.1038/ncomms7186
Nora, E. P. et al. Targeted Degradation of CTCF Decouples Local Insulation of Chromosome Domains from Genomic Compartmentalization. Cell 169, 930–944 e922 (2017).
pubmed: 28525758 pmcid: 5538188 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.05.004
Schwarzer, W. et al. Two independent modes of chromatin organization revealed by cohesin removal. Nature 551, 51–56 (2017).
pubmed: 29094699 pmcid: 5687303 doi: 10.1038/nature24281
Atchison, M. L. Function of YY1 in Long-Distance DNA Interactions. Front. Immunol. 5, 45–45 (2014).
pubmed: 24575094 pmcid: 3918653 doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00045
Schwalie, P. C. et al. Co-binding by YY1 identifies the transcriptionally active, highly conserved set of CTCF-bound regions in primate genomes. Genome Biol. 14, R148–R148 (2013).
pubmed: 24380390 pmcid: 4056453 doi: 10.1186/gb-2013-14-12-r148
International HapMap Consortium. et al. Integrating common and rare genetic variation in diverse human populations. Nature 467, 52–58 (2010).
doi: 10.1038/nature09298
Mills, R. E. et al. An initial map of insertion and deletion (INDEL) variation in the human genome. Genome Res. 16, 1182–1190 (2006).
pubmed: 16902084 pmcid: 1557762 doi: 10.1101/gr.4565806
Sudmant, P. H. et al. An integrated map of structural variation in 2,504 human genomes. Nature 526, 75 (2015).
pubmed: 26432246 pmcid: 4617611 doi: 10.1038/nature15394
Yamada, M. et al. Human oocytes reprogram adult somatic nuclei of a type 1 diabetic to diploid pluripotent stem cells. Nature 510, 533–536 (2014).
pubmed: 24776804 doi: 10.1038/nature13287
Paull, D. et al. Nuclear genome transfer in human oocytes eliminates mitochondrial DNA variants. Nature 493, 632–637 (2013).
pubmed: 23254936 doi: 10.1038/nature11800
Handsaker, R. E., Korn, J. M., Nemesh, J. & McCarroll, S. A. Discovery and genotyping of genome structural polymorphism by sequencing on a population scale. Nat. Genet. 43, 269–276 (2011).
pubmed: 21317889 pmcid: 5094049 doi: 10.1038/ng.768
Koren, A. et al. Differential relationship of DNA replication timing to different forms of human mutation and variation. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 91, 1033–1040 (2012).
pubmed: 23176822 pmcid: 3516607 doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.10.018
Dimitromanolakis, A., Paterson, A. D. & Sun, L. Fast and Accurate Shared Segment Detection and Relatedness Estimation in Un-phased Genetic Data via TRUFFLE. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 105, 78–88 (2019).
pubmed: 31178127 pmcid: 6612710 doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2019.05.007
Zheng, X. et al. A high-performance computing toolset for relatedness and principal component analysis of SNP data. Bioinformatics 28, 3326–3328 (2012).
pubmed: 23060615 pmcid: 3519454 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts606
Howie, B. N., Donnelly, P. & Marchini, J. A flexible and accurate genotype imputation method for the next generation of genome-wide association studies. PLoS Genet. 5, e1000529–e1000529 (2009).
pubmed: 19543373 pmcid: 2689936 doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000529
Storey, J. D. & Tibshirani, R. Statistical significance for genomewide studies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 9440–9445 (2003).
pubmed: 12883005 pmcid: 170937 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1530509100
Ongen, H., Buil, A., Brown, A. A., Dermitzakis, E. T. & Delaneau, O. Fast and efficient QTL mapper for thousands of molecular phenotypes. Bioinformatics 32, 1479–1485 (2016).
pubmed: 26708335 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv722
Devlin, B. & Roeder, K. Genomic Control for Association Studies. Biometrics 55, 997–1004 (1999).
pubmed: 11315092 doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341X.1999.00997.x
Durand, N. C. et al. Juicebox Provides a Visualization System for Hi-C Contact Maps with Unlimited Zoom. Cell Syst. 3, 99–101 (2016).
pubmed: 27467250 pmcid: 5596920 doi: 10.1016/j.cels.2015.07.012
Roadmap Epigenomics Consortium et al. Integrative analysis of 111 reference human epigenomes. Nature 518, 317–330 (2015).
pmcid: 4530010 doi: 10.1038/nature14248
Ernst, J. & Kellis, M. Large-scale imputation of epigenomic datasets for systematic annotation of diverse human tissues. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 364–376 (2015).
pubmed: 25690853 pmcid: 4512306 doi: 10.1038/nbt.3157
Ryba, T. et al. Evolutionarily conserved replication timing profiles predict long-range chromatin interactions and distinguish closely related cell types. Genome Res. 20, 761–770 (2010).
pubmed: 20430782 pmcid: 2877573 doi: 10.1101/gr.099655.109
Hansen, R. S. et al. Sequencing newly replicated DNA reveals widespread plasticity in human replication timing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 139–144 (2010).
pubmed: 19966280 doi: 10.1073/pnas.0912402107
Yaffe, E. et al. Comparative analysis of DNA replication timing reveals conserved large-scale chromosomal architecture. PLoS Genet. 6, e1001011 (2010).
pubmed: 20617169 pmcid: 2895651 doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001011
Ward, L. D. & Kellis, M. HaploReg: a resource for exploring chromatin states, conservation, and regulatory motif alterations within sets of genetically linked variants. Nucleic Acids Res. 40, D930–D934 (2012).
pubmed: 22064851 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr917
Crooks, G. E., Hon, G., Chandonia, J. M. & Brenner, S. E. WebLogo: a sequence logo generator. Genome Res. 14, 1188–1190 (2004).
pubmed: 15173120 pmcid: 419797 doi: 10.1101/gr.849004

Auteurs

Qiliang Ding (Q)

Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.

Matthew M Edwards (MM)

Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.

Ning Wang (N)

Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University, New York, NY, 10032, USA.

Xiang Zhu (X)

Department of Statistics, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, 16801, PA, USA.
Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, 16801, PA, USA.
Department of Statistics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.

Alexa N Bracci (AN)

Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.

Michelle L Hulke (ML)

Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.

Ya Hu (Y)

Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.
New York Genome Center, New York, NY, 10013, USA.

Yao Tong (Y)

Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.

Joyce Hsiao (J)

Department of Human Genetics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.

Christine J Charvet (CJ)

Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.

Sulagna Ghosh (S)

Stanley Center for Psychiatric Research, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, 02142, USA.
Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA.

Robert E Handsaker (RE)

Stanley Center for Psychiatric Research, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, 02142, USA.
Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.

Kevin Eggan (K)

Stanley Center for Psychiatric Research, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, 02142, USA.
Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA.
Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA.

Florian T Merkle (FT)

Wellcome Trust - Medical Research Council Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

Jeannine Gerhardt (J)

Ronald O. Perelman and Claudia Cohen Center for Reproductive Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, 10065, USA.

Dieter Egli (D)

Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University, New York, NY, 10032, USA.

Andrew G Clark (AG)

Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.

Amnon Koren (A)

Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA. koren@cornell.edu.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH