Variant allele frequency in baseline circulating tumour DNA to measure tumour burden and to stratify outcomes in patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: a translational objective of the Valentino study.
Journal
British journal of cancer
ISSN: 1532-1827
Titre abrégé: Br J Cancer
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0370635
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2022
02 2022
Historique:
received:
30
06
2021
accepted:
06
10
2021
revised:
21
09
2021
pubmed:
24
11
2021
medline:
23
2
2022
entrez:
23
11
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), baseline circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) variant allele fraction (VAF) might serve as a surrogate of disease burden and should be evaluated in comparison with CEA and RECIST-defined sum of target lesions. In this pre-planned analysis of the VALENTINO trial, we included patients with RAS wild-type mCRC receiving upfront FOLFOX/panitumumab with available baseline liquid biopsy. CtDNA was analysed by means of a 14-gene NGS panel. For each patient, the gene with the highest VAF in ctDNA was selected. The final cohort included 135 patients. The median VAF was 12.6% (IQR: 2.0-45.2%). Higher VAF was observed in patients with liver metastases and with synchronous metastases presentation. Patients with high VAF had poorer median OS compared to those with low VAF (21.8 vs 36.5 months; HR: 1.82, 95%CI: 1.20-2.76; p = 0.005). VAF outperformed baseline CEA and target lesion diameter in the prognostic stratification and remained significantly correlated with OS (p = 0.003) in a multivariate model. VAF was not significantly correlated with dimensional response and PFS. CtDNA measured by VAF is prognostic in patients with RAS wild-type mCRC. Response and PFS after an anti-EGFR-based first-line strategy are independent from initial tumour burden.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34811502
doi: 10.1038/s41416-021-01591-8
pii: 10.1038/s41416-021-01591-8
pmc: PMC8810873
doi:
Substances chimiques
Circulating Tumor DNA
0
ras Proteins
EC 3.6.5.2
Types de publication
Clinical Trial, Phase II
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
449-455Informations de copyright
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.
Références
ESMO Open. 2018 Jul 09;3(4):e000403
pubmed: 30018814
Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Sep 15;23(18):5648-5656
pubmed: 28536309
Br J Cancer. 2021 Aug;125(5):725-733
pubmed: 34112948
Br J Cancer. 2013 Dec 10;109(12):3067-72
pubmed: 24263065
Ann Oncol. 2018 Jan 1;29(1):112-118
pubmed: 28950295
Ann Oncol. 2015 Aug;26(8):1715-22
pubmed: 25851626
Mol Oncol. 2019 Sep;13(9):1827-1835
pubmed: 31322322
Cells. 2019 May 28;8(6):
pubmed: 31142037
Eur J Cancer. 2021 Feb;144:368-381
pubmed: 33422803
Lancet Oncol. 2020 Apr;21(4):497-507
pubmed: 32164906
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2000 Jul;124(7):979-94
pubmed: 10888773
JCO Precis Oncol. 2019 Dec;3:1-14
pubmed: 35100685
JAMA Oncol. 2019 Mar 1;5(3):343-350
pubmed: 30476968
Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Jun 15;22(12):3067-77
pubmed: 26847055
J Clin Oncol. 2019 Nov 20;37(33):3099-3110
pubmed: 31539295
JAMA Oncol. 2019 Dec 1;5(12):1710-1717
pubmed: 31621801
N Engl J Med. 2019 Oct 24;381(17):1632-1643
pubmed: 31566309
Eur J Cancer. 2021 Feb;144:31-40
pubmed: 33321462
Sci Transl Med. 2014 Feb 19;6(224):224ra24
pubmed: 24553385
Clin Cancer Res. 2020 Apr 15;26(8):1877-1885
pubmed: 31941831
Cancer Cell. 2018 Jul 9;34(1):148-162.e7
pubmed: 29990497
Mol Cancer Ther. 2018 Oct;17(10):2238-2247
pubmed: 29997152
Clin Cancer Res. 2021 May 1;27(9):2505-2514
pubmed: 33547199
JAMA Oncol. 2019 Sep 01;5(9):1268-1275
pubmed: 31268481
ESMO Open. 2020 Nov;5(6):e000944
pubmed: 33148620
Clin Cancer Res. 2019 Feb 15;25(4):1216-1225
pubmed: 30487126
Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Dec;21 Suppl 4:S680-6
pubmed: 24841357
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2021 Nov 2;113(11):1561-1569
pubmed: 33825902