Interhospital transport of critically ill patients: A prospective observational study of patient and transport characteristics.
ICU
cohort study
critically ill
intensive care
intensive care unit
inter facility
inter hospital
patient transfer
transport
Journal
Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
ISSN: 1399-6576
Titre abrégé: Acta Anaesthesiol Scand
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0370270
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Feb 2022
Feb 2022
Historique:
revised:
20
09
2021
received:
06
03
2021
accepted:
15
10
2021
pubmed:
24
11
2021
medline:
27
1
2022
entrez:
23
11
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The cohort of critically ill patients transported between Intensive Care Units (ICUs) in Norway has not been studied previously. The aim of this study was to describe the characteristics of patients and transports for different types of interhospital transfers and explore whether there were differences in morbidity and mortality between the different transfer categories and the general Norwegian ICU population. All transports of critically ill adult patients transferred between two geographically different Intensive Care Units during a one-year period were registered. Patient and transport data were obtained from The Norwegian Intensive Care Registry, The Norwegian Cause of Death Registry, the hospital Electronic Patient Journal, the Air Ambulance Journal System, and the Emergency Medical Communication Centre database. 821 transports of 788 surgical and medical patients were enrolled. Simplified Acute Physiology Scores (SAPSII) were 43, 36 and 38 for urgent secondary transport, non-urgent secondary transport and return transfers, respectively. These were comparable to nationwide SAPSII scores that were 40 for university hospitals and 34 for local hospitals during the same time period. The return transfers had a median SOFA-score of 4.7 and 53% were mechanically ventilated. Only 33% of return transfers were performed by established teams. Intensive care patients transferred between ICUs are as critically ill as the rest of the ICU population, with a similar morbidity and mortality. The return transfers of ICU-patients appear under-triaged compared to secondary transports in terms of allocated resources.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The cohort of critically ill patients transported between Intensive Care Units (ICUs) in Norway has not been studied previously. The aim of this study was to describe the characteristics of patients and transports for different types of interhospital transfers and explore whether there were differences in morbidity and mortality between the different transfer categories and the general Norwegian ICU population.
METHODS
METHODS
All transports of critically ill adult patients transferred between two geographically different Intensive Care Units during a one-year period were registered. Patient and transport data were obtained from The Norwegian Intensive Care Registry, The Norwegian Cause of Death Registry, the hospital Electronic Patient Journal, the Air Ambulance Journal System, and the Emergency Medical Communication Centre database.
RESULTS
RESULTS
821 transports of 788 surgical and medical patients were enrolled. Simplified Acute Physiology Scores (SAPSII) were 43, 36 and 38 for urgent secondary transport, non-urgent secondary transport and return transfers, respectively. These were comparable to nationwide SAPSII scores that were 40 for university hospitals and 34 for local hospitals during the same time period. The return transfers had a median SOFA-score of 4.7 and 53% were mechanically ventilated. Only 33% of return transfers were performed by established teams.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
Intensive care patients transferred between ICUs are as critically ill as the rest of the ICU population, with a similar morbidity and mortality. The return transfers of ICU-patients appear under-triaged compared to secondary transports in terms of allocated resources.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
248-255Subventions
Organisme : Stiftelsen Norsk Luftambulanse
Informations de copyright
© 2021 The Authors. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Foundation.
Références
Meld. St. nr. 11 (2015-16). Nasjonal helse og sykehusplan. Helse- og omsorgsdepartementet. (National health and hospital plan. Ministry of Health and Care Services). 2015. [In Norwegian only]. https://www.regjeringen.no/no/dokumenter/meld.-st.-11-20152016 Accessed Sept 20, 2021
Fanara B, Manzon C, Barbot O, Desmettre T, Capellier G. Recommendations for the intra-hospital transport of critically ill patients. Crit Care. 2010;14(3):R87.
Droogh JM, Smit M, Hut J, de Vos R, Ligtenberg JJ, Zijlstra JG. Inter-hospital transport of critically ill patients; expect surprises. Crit Care. 2012;16:R26.
Grier S, Brant G, Gould TH, von Vopelius-Feldt J, Thompson J. Critical care transfer in an English critical care network: analysis of 1124 transfers delivered by an ad-hoc system. J Intensive Care Soc. 2020;21(1):33-39.
Catalano AR, Winn HR, Gordon E, Frontera JA. Impact of interhospital transfer on complications and outcome after intracranial hemorrhage. Neurocrit Care. 2012;17:324-333.
Wiegersma JS, Droogh JM, Zijlstra JG, Fokkema J, Ligtenberg JJ. Quality of interhospital transport of the critically ill: impact of a mobile intensive care unit with a specialized retrieval team. Crit Care. 2011;15:R75.
Droogh JM, Smit M, Absalom AR, Ligtenberg JJ, Zijlstra JG. Transferring the critically ill patient: are we there yet? Crit Care. 2015;19:62-68.
Le Gall JR, Lemeshow S, Saulnier F. A new simplified acute physiology score (SAPS II) based on a European/North American multicenter study. JAMA. 1993;270(24):2957-2963.
Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J, et al. The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. On behalf of the working group on sepsis-related problems of the european society of intensive care medicine. Intensive Care Med. 1996;22(7):707-710.
Vincent JL, de Mendonça A, Cantraine F, et al. Use of the SOFA score to assess the incidence of organ dysfunction/failure in intensive care units: results of a multicentric, prospective study. Crit Care Med. 1998;26:1793-1800.
Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315:801-810.
Lie KC, Lau CY, Van Vinh CN, West TE, Limmathurotsakul D. Utility of SOFA score, management and outcomes of sepsis in Southeast Asia: a multinational multicenter prospective observational study. J Intensive Care. 2018;6:9.
Raatiniemi L, Mikkelsen K, Fredriksen K, Wisborg T. Do pre-hospital anaesthesiologists reliably predict mortality using the NACA severity score? A retrospective cohort study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2013;57(10):253-259.
Schneider F, Martin J, Schneider G, Schulz CM. The impact of the patient’s initial NACA score on subjective and physiological indicators of workload during pre-hospital emergency care. PLoS One. 2018;13(8):e0202215.
Bonatti J, Göschl O, Larcher P, Wödlinger R, Flora G. Predictors of short-term survival after helicopter rescue. Resuscitation. 1995;30:133-140.
Darioli V, Taffé P, Carron P-N, et al. Evaluation of the discriminative performance of the prehospital national advisory committee for aeronautics score regarding 48-h mortality. J Emerg Med. 2019;26(5):366-372.
von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61(4):344-349.
Elmer J, Callaway CW, Chang C-C, et al. Long-term outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest care at regionalized centers. Ann Emerg Med. 2019;73(1):29-39.
Årsrapport 2014 Norsk Intensivregister. (Norwegian Intensive Care Registry) [In Norwegian only]. https://helse-bergen.no/norsk-intensivregister-nir/arsrapportar Accessed September 20, 2021.
Czajka S, Ziębińska K, Marczenko K, Posmyk B, Szczepańska AJ, Krzych ŁJ. Validation of APACHE II, APACHE III and SAPS II scores in in-hospital and one year mortality prediction in a mixed intensive care unit in Poland: a cohort study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2020;20:296.
Ferreira FL, Bota DP, Bross A, Mélot C, Vincent J. Serial evaluation of the SOFA score to predict outcome in critically ill patients. JAMA. 2001;286(14):1754-1758.