Motion sickness: current concepts and management.
Journal
Current opinion in neurology
ISSN: 1473-6551
Titre abrégé: Curr Opin Neurol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9319162
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 02 2022
01 02 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
29
11
2021
medline:
29
1
2022
entrez:
28
11
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Motion sickness is an ancient phenomenon that affects many people. Nausea, vomiting, disorientation, sweating, fatigue, and headache are just few of the many signs and symptoms that are commonly experienced during an episode of motion sickness. In the present review, we will provide an overview of the current research trends and topics in the domain of motion sickness, including theoretical considerations, physiological and neural mechanisms, individual risk factors, and treatment options, as well as recommendations for future research directions. More recently, motion sickness has been in the focus of attention in the context of two global technological trends, namely automated vehicles and virtual reality. Both technologies bear the potential to revolutionize our daily lives in many ways; however, motion sickness is considered a serious concern that threatens their success and acceptance. The majority of recent research on motion sickness focuses on one of these two areas. Aside from medication (e.g. antimuscarinics, antihistamines), habituation remains the most effective nonpharmacological method to reduce motion sickness. A variety of novel techniques has been investigated with promising results, but an efficient method to reliably prevent or minimize motion sickness has yet to emerge.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34839340
doi: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000001018
pii: 00019052-202202000-00017
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
107-112Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Références
Berti S, Keshavarz B. Neuropsychological approaches to visually-induced vection: an overview and evaluation of neuroimaging and neurophysiological studies. Multisens Res 2020; 34:153–186.
Cha Y-H, Golding JF, Keshavarz B, et al. Motion sickness diagnostic criteria: consensus document of the classification committee of the Bárány society. J Vestib Res 2021; 31:327–344.
Kuiper OX, Bos JE, Diels C, Schmidt EA. Knowing what's coming: anticipatory audio cues can mitigate motion sickness. Appl Ergon 2020; 85:103068.
Classen S, Hwangbo SW, Mason J, et al. Older Drivers’ motion and simulator sickness before and after automated vehicle exposure. Safety 2021; 7:26.
Schmidt EA, Kuiper OX, Wolter S, et al. An international survey on the incidence and modulating factors of carsickness. Transp Res F Traffic Psychol Behav 2020; 71:76–87.
Chang E, Kim HT, Yoo B. Virtual reality sickness: a review of causes and measurements. Int J Hum Comput Int 2020; 36:1658–1682.
Caserman P, Garcia-Agundez A, Gámez Zerban A, Göbel S. Cybersickness in current-generation virtual reality head-mounted displays: systematic review and outlook. Virtual Reality 2021; 25:1153–1170.
Saredakis D, Szpak A, Birckhead B, et al. Factors associated with virtual reality sickness in head-mounted displays: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Hum Neurosci 2020; 14:96.
Chang C-H, Stoffregen TA, Tseng L-Y, et al. Control of a virtual vehicle influences postural activity and motion sickness in preadolescent children. Hum Mov Sci 2021; 78:102832.
Teaford MA, Cook HE, Hassebrock JA, et al. Perceptual validation of nonlinear postural predictors of visually induced motion sickness. Front Psychol 2020; 11:1533.
Litleskare S. The relationship between postural stability and cybersickness: it's complicated – an experimental trial assessing practical implications of cybersickness etiology. Physiol Behav 2021; 236:113422.
Bronstein AM, Golding JF, Gresty MA. Visual vertigo, motion sickness, and disorientation in vehicles. Semin Neurol 2020; 40:116–129.
Abouzari M, Cheung D, Pham T, et al. The relationship between vestibular migraine and motion sickness susceptibility. Otol Neurotol 2020; 41:1116–1121.
Cha Y-H, Baloh RW, Cho C, et al. Mal débarquement syndrome diagnostic criteria: consensus document of the Classification Committee of the Bárány Society. J Vestib Res 2020; 30:285–293.
Lackner JR, DiZio P. Velocity storage: its multiple roles. J Neurophysiol 2020; 123:1206–1215.
Maruta J. The scientific contributions of Bernard Cohen. Front Neurol 2021; 11:1853.
Wickham RJ. Revisiting the physiology of nausea and vomiting-challenging the paradigm. Support Care Cancer 2020; 28:13–21.
Zhong W, Shahbaz O, Teskey G, et al. Mechanisms of nausea and vomiting: current knowledge and recent advances in intracellular emetic signaling systems. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22:5797.
Smyth J, Birrell SA, Woodman R, Jennings PA. Exploring the utility of EDA and skin temperature as individual physiological correlates of motion sickness. Appl Ergon 2021; 92:103315.
Molisz A, Ryk M, Rataj M, et al. Cardiovascular testing of seasickness in healthy volunteers on life rafts. Int J Occup Med Environ Health 2020; 33:467–477.
Kaduk SI, Roberts AP, Stanton NA. Cassenti DN, Scataglini S, Rajulu SL, Wright JL. Psychophysiological predictors of motion sickness in the driving simulator. Advances in simulation and digital human modeling. New York: Springer International Publishing; 2021. 103–110.
Tauscher J-P, Witt A, Bosse S, et al. Exploring neural and peripheral physiological correlates of simulator sickness. Comput Animat Virtual Worlds 2020; 31:e1953.
Recenti M, Ricciardi C, Aubonnet R, et al. Toward predicting motion sickness using virtual reality and a moving platform assessing brain, muscles, and heart signals. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2021; 9:635661.
Liao C-Y, Tai S-K, Chen R-C, Hendry H. Using EEG and deep learning to predict motion sickness under wearing a virtual reality device. IEEE Access 2020; 8:126784–126796.
Huppert D, Grill E, Brandt T. Survey of motion sickness susceptibility in children and adolescents aged 3 months to 18 years. J Neurol 2019; 266:65–73.
Besnard S, Bois J, Hitier M, et al. Motion sickness lessons from the Southern Ocean. Aerosp Med Hum Perform 2021; 92:720–727.
Lucas D, Mehaneze M, Loddé B, Jegaden D. Seasickness and its impact on researchers’ work on board French oceanographic vessels. Int Marit Health 2020; 71:160–165.
Zhang X, Sun Y. Motion sickness predictors in college students and their first experience sailing at sea. Aerosp Med Hum Perform 2020; 91:71–78.
Curry C, Peterson N, Li R, Stoffregen TA. Postural precursors of motion sickness in head-mounted displays: drivers and passengers, women and men. Ergonomics 2020; 63:1502–1511.
Stanney KM, Fidopiastis C, Foster L. Virtual reality is sexist: but it does not have to be. Front Robot AI 2020; 7:4.
Kim H, Kim DJ, Chung WH, et al. Clinical predictors of cybersickness in virtual reality (VR) among highly stressed people. Sci Rep 2021; 11:12139.
Irmak T, Pool DM, Happee R. Objective and subjective responses to motion sickness: the group and the individual. Exp Brain Res 2021; 239:515–531.
Leilei P, Ruirui Q, Shuifeng X, et al. Predictive ability of motion sickness susceptibility questionnaire for motion sickness individual difference in Chinese young males. Ocean Coast Manage 2021; 203:105505.
Keshavarz B, Murovec B, Mohanathas N, Golding JF. The Visually Induced Motion Sickness Susceptibility Questionnaire (VIMSSQ): estimating individual susceptibility to motion sickness-like symptoms when using visual devices. Hum Factors 2021; 187208211008687. [Epub ahead of print].
Golding JF, Rafiq A, Keshavarz B. Predicting individual susceptibility to visually induced motion sickness by questionnaire. Front Virtual Real 2021; 2: doi: 10.3389/frvir.2021.576871.
doi: 10.3389/frvir.2021.576871
Wurthmann S, Naegel S, Roesner M, et al. Sensitized rotatory motion perception and increased susceptibility to motion sickness in vestibular migraine: a cross-sectional study. Eur J Neurol 2021; 28:2357–2366.
Stelling D, Hermes M, Huelmann G, et al. Individual differences in the temporal progression of motion sickness and anxiety: the role of passengers’ trait anxiety and motion sickness history. Ergonomics 2021; 64:1062–1071.
Irmak T, de Winkel KN, Pool DM, et al. Individual motion perception parameters and motion sickness frequency sensitivity in fore-aft motion. Exp Brain Res 2021; 239:1727–1745.
de Winkel KN, Pretto P, Nooij SAE, et al. Efficacy of augmented visual environments for reducing sickness in autonomous vehicles. Appl Ergon 2021; 90:103282.
Houston BT, Chowdhury YS. Meclizine. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2021 Jan–. PMID: 32809480.
Wibble T, Engström J, Verrecchia L, Pansell T. The effects of meclizine on motion sickness revisited. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2020; 86:1510–1518.
Doron O, Samuel O, Karfunkel-Doron D, Tal D. Scopolamine treatment and adaptation to airsickness. Aerosp Med Hum Perform 2020; 91:313–317.
Riad M, Hithe CC. Scopolamine. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2021 Jan–. PMID: 32119284.
Polymeropoulos VM, Czeisler MÉ, Gibson MM, et al. Tradipitant in the treatment of motion sickness: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Front Neurol 2020; 11:563373.
Weech S, Wall T, Barnett-Cowan M. Reduction of cybersickness during and immediately following noisy galvanic vestibular stimulation. Exp Brain Res 2020; 238:427–437.
Gálvez-García G, Aldunate N, Bascour–Sandoval C, et al. Decreasing motion sickness by mixing different techniques. Appl Ergon 2020; 82:102931.
Gálvez-García G, Albayay J, Fonseca F, Bascour-Sandoval C. Joint and individual effectiveness of galvanic cutaneous stimulation and tactile stimulation at decreasing Simulator Adaptation Syndrome. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0240627.
Sawada Y, Itaguchi Y, Hayashi M, et al. Effects of synchronised engine sound and vibration presentation on visually induced motion sickness. Sci Rep 2020; 10:7553.
Grassini S, Laumann K, de Martin Topranin V, Thorp S. Evaluating the effect of multisensory stimulations on simulator sickness and sense of presence during HMD-mediated VR experience. Ergonomics 2021; 0:1–11.
Peck K, Russo F, Campos JL, Keshavarz B. Examining potential effects of arousal, valence, and likability of music on visually induced motion sickness. Exp Brain Res 2020; 238:2347–2358.
Hussain R, Chessa M, Solari F. Mitigating cybersickness in virtual reality systems through foveated depth-of-field blur. Sensors (Basel) 2021; 21:4006.
Nie G-Y, Duh HB-L, Liu Y, Wang Y. Analysis on mitigation of visually induced motion sickness by applying dynamical blurring on a user's retina. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph 2020; 26:2535–2545.
Adhanom IB, Al-Zayer M, Macneilage P, Folmer E. Field-of-view restriction to reduce VR sickness does not impede spatial learning in women. ACM Trans Appl Percept 2021; 18:1–17.
Hemmerich WA, Keshavarz B, Hecht H. Visually induced motion sickness on the horizon: the role of world-centered vs observer-centered reference information. Front Virtual Real 2020; 1: doi: 10.3389/frvir.2020.582095.
doi: 10.3389/frvir.2020.582095
Smyth J, Jennings P, Bennett P, Birrell S. A novel method for reducing motion sickness susceptibility through training visuospatial ability – a two-part study. Appl Ergon 2021; 90:103264.
Liu R, Zhuang C, Yang R, Ma L. Effect of economically friendly acustimulation approach against cybersickness in video-watching tasks using consumer virtual reality devices. Appl Ergon 2020; 82:102946.