Associations between alcohol demand and both the experience and subjective evaluation of positive and negative alcohol-related consequences.
alcohol-related consequences
behavioral economics
consequence evaluations
demand
Journal
Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research
ISSN: 1530-0277
Titre abrégé: Alcohol Clin Exp Res
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7707242
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 2021
11 2021
Historique:
revised:
09
08
2021
received:
06
02
2021
accepted:
10
09
2021
pubmed:
30
11
2021
medline:
24
3
2022
entrez:
29
11
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Considerable variation exists in the extent to which alcohol-related consequences are evaluated as positive or negative. These evaluations, in turn, predict subsequent drinking behavior. Understanding the etiological pathways to positive and negative alcohol-related consequences is essential to the design of interventions aimed at reducing drinking consequences. Behavioral economic models posit that excessive alcohol valuation contributes to problematic use. Elevated alcohol demand (i.e., relative alcohol value) is associated with negative alcohol-related consequences; however, it is unclear whether demand is related to positive consequences or subjective consequence evaluations. College student drinkers (n = 114; 74.6% female) completed an online survey. Participants indicated whether they had ever experienced any of 24 negative and 14 positive consequences and subjectively evaluated their most recent experience of each consequence endorsed. An alcohol purchase task assessed hypothetical alcohol consumption across 14 prices and three observed demand indices were calculated: intensity (i.e., consumption at zero cost), O Intensity and O Students with higher intensity reported more prior alcohol consequences (positive and negative), independent of drinking level. However, subjective evaluations of recent consequences did not vary as a function of demand. Results support using behavioral economic models to facilitate identifying etiologic pathways to alcohol consequences and suggest that novel interventions incorporating demand manipulation may reduce drinking consequences.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Considerable variation exists in the extent to which alcohol-related consequences are evaluated as positive or negative. These evaluations, in turn, predict subsequent drinking behavior. Understanding the etiological pathways to positive and negative alcohol-related consequences is essential to the design of interventions aimed at reducing drinking consequences. Behavioral economic models posit that excessive alcohol valuation contributes to problematic use. Elevated alcohol demand (i.e., relative alcohol value) is associated with negative alcohol-related consequences; however, it is unclear whether demand is related to positive consequences or subjective consequence evaluations.
METHODS
College student drinkers (n = 114; 74.6% female) completed an online survey. Participants indicated whether they had ever experienced any of 24 negative and 14 positive consequences and subjectively evaluated their most recent experience of each consequence endorsed. An alcohol purchase task assessed hypothetical alcohol consumption across 14 prices and three observed demand indices were calculated: intensity (i.e., consumption at zero cost), O
RESULTS
Intensity and O
CONCLUSION
Students with higher intensity reported more prior alcohol consequences (positive and negative), independent of drinking level. However, subjective evaluations of recent consequences did not vary as a function of demand. Results support using behavioral economic models to facilitate identifying etiologic pathways to alcohol consequences and suggest that novel interventions incorporating demand manipulation may reduce drinking consequences.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34843115
doi: 10.1111/acer.14720
pmc: PMC8642271
mid: NIHMS1741367
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2357-2369Subventions
Organisme : NIAAA NIH HHS
ID : K01 AA022938
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDA NIH HHS
ID : K01 DA039311
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAAA NIH HHS
ID : T32 AA007459
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2021 by the Research Society on Alcoholism.
Références
Psychol Addict Behav. 2010 Jun;24(2):342-8
pubmed: 20565160
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2009 Dec;17(6):396-404
pubmed: 19968404
Annu Rev Psychol. 2004;55:431-61
pubmed: 14744222
J Stud Alcohol. 1993 Nov;54(6):700-9
pubmed: 8271806
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2005 Jul;29(7):1180-9
pubmed: 16046873
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2014;10:641-77
pubmed: 24679180
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 1999 Nov;7(4):412-26
pubmed: 10609976
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018 Oct 1;191:117-140
pubmed: 30099174
Psychol Addict Behav. 2020 Jun;34(4):497-505
pubmed: 31999173
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2018 Jul;42(7):1304-1314
pubmed: 29757460
J Stud Alcohol Suppl. 2002 Mar;(14):118-28
pubmed: 12022717
Addict Behav. 2007 Nov;32(11):2469-94
pubmed: 17590277
Behav Res Ther. 1996 Jan;34(1):61-71
pubmed: 8561766
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2016 Jul;77(4):656-60
pubmed: 27340971
Psychol Addict Behav. 2013 Sep;27(3):799-805
pubmed: 23772762
Psychol Addict Behav. 2016 Dec;30(8):819-826
pubmed: 28068111
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2015 May;39(5):919-31
pubmed: 25872599
Addict Behav. 2013 Nov;38(11):2625-34
pubmed: 23899424
BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 16;9(7):e029184
pubmed: 31315869
Addict Behav. 2011 Dec;36(12):1148-53
pubmed: 21855224
Psychol Rev. 2008 Jan;115(1):186-98
pubmed: 18211190
Psychol Addict Behav. 2015 Dec;29(4):992-1002
pubmed: 26168225
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2011 Nov;72(6):991-9
pubmed: 22051213
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2006 May;14(2):219-27
pubmed: 16756426
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2007 May;68(3):393-8
pubmed: 17446979
Addict Behav. 2008 Jan;33(1):54-68
pubmed: 17618063
Addict Behav. 2016 Jul;58:110-6
pubmed: 26922158
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2018 Apr;235(4):935-945
pubmed: 29470605
J Abnorm Psychol. 1988 May;97(2):181-95
pubmed: 3133403
Psychol Addict Behav. 2007 Dec;21(4):545-54
pubmed: 18072837
Addict Behav. 2007 Oct;32(10):2046-61
pubmed: 17331658
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016 Oct 01;167:57-66
pubmed: 27515726
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 8;12(3):e0172213
pubmed: 28273162
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2015 Oct;23(5):377-86
pubmed: 26147181
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2014 Jan;75(1):103-14
pubmed: 24411802
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2015 Jan 1;146:39-44
pubmed: 25468819
Forensic Sci Rev. 2019 Jul;31(2):161-184
pubmed: 31270060
Psychol Addict Behav. 2013 Mar;27(1):42-51
pubmed: 22985054
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2014 Feb;38(2):301-8
pubmed: 24117468
Prev Med. 2019 Nov;128:105789
pubmed: 31400376
J Am Coll Health. 2009 Jul-Aug;58(1):26-32
pubmed: 19592350
Addict Behav. 2005 May;30(4):755-65
pubmed: 15833579
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2001 Feb;24(2):97-129
pubmed: 11120394
Psychol Addict Behav. 2003 Mar;17(1):13-23
pubmed: 12665077
Addict Behav. 2008 Oct;33(10):1375-81
pubmed: 18639384
J Adolesc. 2011 Feb;34(1):87-94
pubmed: 20226517
Prev Med. 2016 Nov;92:24-30
pubmed: 27151545
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2014 Jul;38(7):2066-72
pubmed: 24948397
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020 Mar 1;208:107838
pubmed: 31954948
Addict Behav. 2004 Feb;29(2):311-21
pubmed: 14732419
Science. 1997 Oct 3;278(5335):52-8
pubmed: 9311926
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2012 Apr;20(2):92-106
pubmed: 22182417
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007 Jul 10;89(2-3):227-33
pubmed: 17289297
Curr Opin Psychol. 2019 Dec;30:42-47
pubmed: 30807957
JAMA Psychiatry. 2015 Aug;72(8):757-66
pubmed: 26039070