Medially positioned plate in first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2021
2021
Historique:
received:
19
08
2021
accepted:
12
11
2021
entrez:
1
12
2021
pubmed:
2
12
2021
medline:
12
1
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The purpose of this study was to biomechanically compare the stability of first metatarsophalangeal (MTP1) joint arthrodesis with dorsally and medially positioned plates. A physical model of the MTP1 joint consists of printed synthetic bones, a titanium locking plate and screws. In the experiments, samples with dorsally and medially positioned plates were subjected to loading of ground load character in a universal testing machine. Force-displacement relations and relative displacements of bones were recorded. The obtained results were used to validate the corresponding finite element models of the MTP1 joint. Nonlinear finite element simulations of the toe-off phase of gait were performed to determine the deformation and stress state in the MTP1 joint for two positions of the plate. In numerical simulations, the maximum displacement in the dorsal direction was noticed at the tip of the distal phalanx and was equal to 19.6 mm for the dorsal plate and 9.63 mm for the medial plate for a resultant force of 150 N. Lower relative bone displacements and smaller plastic deformation in the plate were observed in the model with the medial plate. Stress values were also smaller in the medially positioned plate and locking screws compared to fixation with the dorsal plate. A medially positioned locking plate provides better stability of the MTP1 joint than a dorsally positioned plate due to greater vertical bending stiffness of the medial plate. Smaller relative bone displacements observed in fixation with the medial plate may be beneficial for the bone healing process. Moreover, lower stress values may decrease the risk of complications associated with hardware failure.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34852005
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260572
pii: PONE-D-21-26202
pmc: PMC8635389
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0260572Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
J Orthop Res. 2017 Nov;35(11):2415-2424
pubmed: 28240380
Tissue Eng Part A. 2010 Jan;16(1):191-9
pubmed: 19678759
Foot Ankle Spec. 2008 Feb;1(1):24-8
pubmed: 19825688
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008 Dec;466(12):2947-54
pubmed: 18820987
Int Orthop. 2008 Aug;32(4):489-95
pubmed: 17375298
Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2018 Apr;17(2):559-576
pubmed: 29139051
Ortop Traumatol Rehabil. 2021 Jun 30;23(3):205-212
pubmed: 34187940
Foot Ankle Surg. 2017 Dec;23(4):268-274
pubmed: 29202986
Foot Ankle Int. 1997 Apr;18(4):195-8
pubmed: 9127107
Foot Ankle Int. 2012 May;33(5):400-5
pubmed: 22735282
J Orthop Res. 2005 May;23(3):639-45
pubmed: 15885486
Foot Ankle Clin. 2011 Mar;16(1):1-12
pubmed: 21338925
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2018 Dec;104(8):1221-1226
pubmed: 30318469
J Orthop Surg Res. 2017 Feb 6;12(1):23
pubmed: 28166805
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2018 Jul - Aug;57(4):771-775
pubmed: 29752219
J Foot Ankle Surg. 1993 Sep-Oct;32(5):517-25
pubmed: 8252012
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2001 Nov-Dec;40(6):414-7
pubmed: 11777239
Orthopedics. 1990 Sep;13(9):1037-44
pubmed: 2235736
Foot Ankle Int. 2009 Aug;30(8):752-7
pubmed: 19735631
Med Eng Phys. 2016 Apr;38(4):417-22
pubmed: 26920074
Unfallheilkunde. 1977 May;80(5):161-4
pubmed: 867591
Foot Ankle. 1992 Sep;13(7):367-77
pubmed: 1427525
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2009 Jul;95(1):23-30
pubmed: 19231021
Int Wound J. 2021 Jul 13;:
pubmed: 34255939
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1952 Jan;34-A(1):129-34
pubmed: 14907794
J Biomech. 2021 Jan 22;115:110148
pubmed: 33341439
Foot Ankle Int. 2020 Apr;41(4):457-462
pubmed: 31994419
Lancet. 1955 Mar 19;268(6864):597
pubmed: 14354946
Foot Ankle Int. 2010 May;31(5):385-90
pubmed: 20460064
Gait Posture. 2002 Feb;15(1):1-9
pubmed: 11809575