Population group differences in subjective importance of meat in diet and red and processed meat consumption.

Meat consumption Population study Red and processed meat Socioeconomic differences Subjective importance of meat

Journal

Appetite
ISSN: 1095-8304
Titre abrégé: Appetite
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8006808

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 02 2022
Historique:
received: 24 09 2021
revised: 12 11 2021
accepted: 01 12 2021
pubmed: 7 12 2021
medline: 25 3 2022
entrez: 6 12 2021
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Red and processed meat (RPM) consumption associates directly with several unfavorable health outcomes and with environmental impact of diet. RPM consumption differs between certain population groups, and moreover, encompasses various subjective meanings. Literature on determinants of subjective importance of meat in diet (SIM), however, is scarce. Aims of this study were to determine which sociodemographic and -economic characteristics associate with SIM and RPM consumption. The study was based on the FinHealth 2017 Study. The sample comprised 4671 participants aged 18-74 years. SIM was asked with a question including five response options from "not important at all" to "very important". Habitual dietary intake including RPM consumption was studied with a food frequency questionnaire. RPM consumption level grew in parallel with SIM categories. RPM consumption was high and SIM prevailing in men, those living in rural areas, and those with low education. Women living in household with children consumed more RPM than other women but did not find meat more important. Conversely, men living in household with children found meat more important but did not consume it more than other men. Domain analyses considering individuals within the highest RPM consumption quintile revealed that the oldest age group found meat significantly less important than the youngest group. In order to be able to lower RPM consumption at population level and to move towards healthier and climate-wiser diets, it is important to identify subgroups that consume much meat but also subgroups that find meat especially important. Such dietary transition may be especially challenging to subgroups that consume much meat and also consider it important. Actions to support the dietary transition in different population groups should be developed.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34871587
pii: S0195-6663(21)00743-1
doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105836
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

105836

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest None.

Auteurs

Laura Sares-Jäske (L)

Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, P.O. Box 30, FI-00271 Helsinki, Finland. Electronic address: laura.sares-jaske@thl.fi.

Liisa Valsta (L)

Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, P.O. Box 30, FI-00271 Helsinki, Finland.

Peppi Haario (P)

Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, P.O. Box 30, FI-00271 Helsinki, Finland.

Tuija Martelin (T)

Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, P.O. Box 30, FI-00271 Helsinki, Finland.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH