Monitoring the binding and insertion of a single transmembrane protein by an insertase.


Journal

Nature communications
ISSN: 2041-1723
Titre abrégé: Nat Commun
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101528555

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 12 2021
Historique:
received: 10 06 2021
accepted: 11 11 2021
entrez: 7 12 2021
pubmed: 8 12 2021
medline: 11 1 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Cells employ highly conserved families of insertases and translocases to insert and fold proteins into membranes. How insertases insert and fold membrane proteins is not fully known. To investigate how the bacterial insertase YidC facilitates this process, we here combine single-molecule force spectroscopy and fluorescence spectroscopy approaches, and molecular dynamics simulations. We observe that within 2 ms, the cytoplasmic α-helical hairpin of YidC binds the polypeptide of the membrane protein Pf3 at high conformational variability and kinetic stability. Within 52 ms, YidC strengthens its binding to the substrate and uses the cytoplasmic α-helical hairpin domain and hydrophilic groove to transfer Pf3 to the membrane-inserted, folded state. In this inserted state, Pf3 exposes low conformational variability such as typical for transmembrane α-helical proteins. The presence of YidC homologues in all domains of life gives our mechanistic insight into insertase-mediated membrane protein binding and insertion general relevance for membrane protein biogenesis.

Identifiants

pubmed: 34873152
doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-27315-3
pii: 10.1038/s41467-021-27315-3
pmc: PMC8648943
doi:

Substances chimiques

Escherichia coli Proteins 0
Membrane Transport Proteins 0
YIDC protein, E coli 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

7082

Informations de copyright

© 2021. The Author(s).

Références

Cymer, F., von Heijne, G. & White, S. H. Mechanisms of integral membrane protein insertion and folding. J. Mol. Biol. 427, 999–1022 (2015).
pubmed: 25277655 doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2014.09.014
Pugsley, A. P., Francetic, O., Driessen, A. J. & de Lorenzo, V. Getting out: protein traffic in prokaryotes. Mol. Microbiol. 52, 3–11 (2004).
pubmed: 15049806 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2003.03966.x
Preuss, M., Ott, M., Funes, S., Luirink, J. & Herrmann, J. M. Evolution of mitochondrial oxa proteins from bacterial YidC. Inherited and acquired functions of a conserved protein insertion machinery. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 13004–13011 (2005).
pubmed: 15654078 doi: 10.1074/jbc.M414093200
Driessen, A. J. M. & Nouwen, N. Protein translocation across the bacterial cytoplasmic membrane. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 77, 643–667 (2008).
pubmed: 18078384 doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.77.061606.160747
Serdiuk, T. et al. Insertion and folding pathways of single membrane proteins guided by translocases and insertases. Sci. Adv. 5, eaau6824 (2019).
pubmed: 30801000 pmcid: 6385520 doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aau6824
Anghel, S. A., McGilvray, P. T., Hegde, R. S. & Keenan, R. J. Identification of Oxa1 homologs operating in the eukaryotic endoplasmic reticulum. Cell Rep. 21, 3708–3716 (2017).
pubmed: 29281821 pmcid: 5868721 doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.12.006
Urbanus, M. L. et al. Targeting, insertion, and localization of Escherichia coli YidC. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 12718–12723 (2002).
pubmed: 11821429 doi: 10.1074/jbc.M200311200
Dalbey, R. E., Kuhn, A., Zhu, L. & Kiefer, D. The membrane insertase YidC. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1843, 1489–1496 (2014).
pubmed: 24418623 doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2013.12.022
van der Laan, M., Bechtluft, P., Kol, S., Nouwen, N. & Driessen, A. J. M. F1F0 ATP synthase subunit c is a substrate of the novel YidC pathway for membrane protein biogenesis. J. Cell Biol. 165, 213–222 (2004).
pubmed: 15096523 pmcid: 2172039 doi: 10.1083/jcb.200402100
Facey, S. J., Neugebauer, S. A., Krauss, S. & Kuhn, A. The mechanosensitive channel protein MscL is targeted by the SRP to the novel YidC membrane insertion pathway of Escherichia coli. J. Mol. Biol. 365, 995–1004 (2007).
pubmed: 17113597 doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.10.083
Serdiuk, T. et al. YidC assists the stepwise and stochastic folding of membrane proteins. Nat. Chem. Biol. 12, 911–917 (2016).
pubmed: 27595331 pmcid: 5069129 doi: 10.1038/nchembio.2169
Samuelson, J. et al. YidC mediates membrane protein insertion in bacteria. Nature 406, 637–641 (2000).
pubmed: 10949305 doi: 10.1038/35020586
Serek, J. et al. Escherichia coli YidC is a membrane insertase for Sec-independent proteins. EMBO J. 23, 294–301 (2004).
pubmed: 14739936 pmcid: 1271765 doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600063
Chen, M. et al. Direct interaction of YidC with the Sec-independent Pf3 coat protein during its membrane protein insertion. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 7670–7675 (2002).
pubmed: 11751917 doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110644200
Kiefer, D. & Kuhn, A. YidC-mediated membrane insertion. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 365, https://doi.org/10.1093/femsle/fny106 (2018).
He, H., Kuhn, A. & Dalbey, R. E. Tracking the stepwise movement of a membrane-inserting protein in vivo. J. Mol. Biol. 432, 484–496 (2020).
pubmed: 31669168 doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2019.10.010
Yu, Z., Koningstein, G., Pop, A. & Luirink, J. The conserved third transmembrane segment of YidC contacts nascent Escherichia coli inner membrane proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 34635–34642 (2008).
pubmed: 18840604 pmcid: 3259860 doi: 10.1074/jbc.M804344200
Kumazaki, K. et al. Structural basis of Sec-independent membrane protein insertion by YidC. Nature 509, 516–520 (2014).
pubmed: 24739968 doi: 10.1038/nature13167
Kumazaki, K. et al. Crystal structure of Escherichia coli YidC, a membrane protein chaperone and insertase. Sci. Rep. 4, 7299 (2014).
pubmed: 25466392 pmcid: 4252904 doi: 10.1038/srep07299
Bai, L., You, Q., Feng, X., Kovach, A. & Li, H. Structure of the ER membrane complex, a transmembrane-domain insertase. Nature 584, 475–478 (2020).
pubmed: 32494008 pmcid: 7442705 doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2389-3
Pleiner, T. et al. Structural basis for membrane insertion by the human ER membrane protein complex. Science 369, 433 (2020).
pubmed: 32439656 pmcid: 7547852 doi: 10.1126/science.abb5008
Lewis, A. J. O. & Hegde, R. S. A unified evolutionary origin for SecY and YidC. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.20.422553 (2020).
Chen, Y., Soman, R., Shanmugam, S. K., Kuhn, A. & Dalbey, R. E. The role of the strictly conserved positively charged residue differs among the Gram-positive, Gram-negative and chloroplast YidC homologs. J. Biol. Chem. 289, 35656–35667 (2014).
pubmed: 25359772 pmcid: 4271247 doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.595082
Dufrene, Y. F., Martinez-Martin, D., Medalsy, I., Alsteens, D. & Muller, D. J. Multiparametric imaging of biological systems by force-distance curve-based AFM. Nat. Methods 10, 847–854 (2013).
pubmed: 23985731 doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2602
Bujalowski, P. J. & Oberhauser, A. F. Tracking unfolding and refolding reactions of single proteins using atomic force microscopy methods. Methods 60, 151–160 (2013).
pubmed: 23523554 pmcid: 3669651 doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2013.03.010
Bell, G. Models for the specific adhesion of cells to cells. Science 200, 618–627 (1978).
pubmed: 347575 doi: 10.1126/science.347575
Spoerri, P. M. et al. Conformational plasticity of human protease-activated receptor 1 upon antagonist- and agonist-binding. Structure 27, 1517–1526 e1513 (2019).
pubmed: 31422910 doi: 10.1016/j.str.2019.07.014
Zocher, M., Bippes, C. A., Zhang, C. & Muller, D. J. Single-molecule force spectroscopy of G-protein-coupled receptors. Chem. Soc. Rev. 42, 7801–7815 (2013).
pubmed: 23799399 doi: 10.1039/c3cs60085h
Winterfeld, S., Ernst, S., Borsch, M., Gerken, U. & Kuhn, A. Real time observation of single membrane protein insertion events by the Escherichia coli insertase YidC. PLoS ONE 8, e59023 (2013).
pubmed: 23527078 pmcid: 3602594 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059023
Pluhackova, K., Wassenaar, T. A. & Böckmann, R. A. In Membrane Biogenesis. Methods in Molecular Biology (Methods and Protocols) Vol. 1033 (eds Rapaport, D. & Herrmann, J.) (Humana Press, 2013).
Wassenaar, T. A., Pluhackova, K., Böckmann, R. A., Marrink, S. J. & Tieleman, D. P. Going backward: a flexible geometric approach to reverse transformation from coarse grained to atomistic models. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 10, 676–690 (2014).
pubmed: 26580045 doi: 10.1021/ct400617g
Costescu, B. I. & Gräter, F. Time-resolved force distribution analysis. BMC Biophys. 6, 5 (2013).
pubmed: 24499624 pmcid: 3669045 doi: 10.1186/2046-1682-6-5
Evans, E. & Ritchie, K. Dynamic strength of molecular adhesion bonds. Biophys. J. 72, 1541–1555 (1997).
pubmed: 9083660 pmcid: 1184350 doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(97)78802-7
Evans, E. Probing the relation between force–lifetime–and chemistry in single molecular bonds. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 30, 105–128 (2001).
pubmed: 11340054 doi: 10.1146/annurev.biophys.30.1.105
Spoerri, P. M. et al. Structural properties of the human protease-activated receptor 1 changing by a strong antagonist. Structure 26, 829–838 e824 (2018).
pubmed: 29731231 doi: 10.1016/j.str.2018.03.020
Kedrov, A. et al. Structural dynamics of the YidC:ribosome complex during membrane protein biogenesis. Cell Rep. 17, 2943–2954 (2016).
pubmed: 27974208 pmcid: 5186731 doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.11.059
Imhof, N., Kuhn, A. & Gerken, U. Substrate-dependent conformational dynamics of the Escherichia coli membrane insertase YidC. Biochemistry 50, 3229–3239 (2011).
pubmed: 21401071 doi: 10.1021/bi1020293
Kumar, S., Ma, B., Tsai, C. J., Sinha, N. & Nussinov, R. Folding and binding cascades: dynamic landscapes and population shifts. Protein Sci. 9, 10–19 (2000).
pubmed: 10739242 pmcid: 2144430 doi: 10.1110/ps.9.1.10
Wang, T., Ingram, C. & Weisshaar, J. C. Model lipid bilayer with facile diffusion of lipids and integral membrane proteins. Langmuir 26, 11157–11164 (2010).
pubmed: 20459075 pmcid: 5814108 doi: 10.1021/la101046r
Borgia, A., Williams, P. M. & Clarke, J. Single-molecule studies of protein folding. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 77, 101–125 (2008).
pubmed: 18412537 doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.77.060706.093102
Alsteens, D. et al. Nanomechanical mapping of first binding steps of a virus to animal cells. Nat. Nanotechnol. 12, 177–183 (2017).
pubmed: 27798607 doi: 10.1038/nnano.2016.228
Johnson, K. C. & Thomas, W. E. How do we know when single-molecule force spectroscopy really tests single bonds? Biophys. J. 114, 2032–2039 (2018).
pubmed: 29742396 pmcid: 5961468 doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2018.04.002
Laskowski, P. R. et al. High-resolution imaging and multiparametric characterization of native membranes by combining confocal microscopy and an atomic force microscopy-based toolbox. ACS Nano 11, 8292–8301 (2017).
pubmed: 28745869 doi: 10.1021/acsnano.7b03456
Team, R. D. C. R: a language and environment for statistical computing (2019).
Piana, S., Lindorff-Larsen, K. & Shaw, D. E. Protein folding kinetics and thermodynamics from atomistic simulation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 17845 (2012).
pubmed: 22822217 pmcid: 3497772 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1201811109
Yu, H. et al. Energy landscape analysis of native folding of the prion protein yields the diffusion constant, transition path time, and rates. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 14452 (2012).
pubmed: 22908253 pmcid: 3437844 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1206190109
Jiang, F. et al. Defining the regions of Escherichia coli YidC that contribute to activity. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 48965–48972 (2003).
pubmed: 14506280 doi: 10.1074/jbc.M307362200
Thiaudiere, E., Soekarjo, M., Kuchinka, E., Kuhn, A. & Vogel, H. Structural characterization of membrane insertion of M13 procoat, M13 coat, and Pf3 coat proteins. Biochemistry 32, 12186–12196 (1993).
pubmed: 8218296 doi: 10.1021/bi00096a031
Abraham, M. J. et al. GROMACS: high performance molecular simulations through multi-level parallelism from laptops to supercomputers. SoftwareX 1-2, 19–25 (2015).
doi: 10.1016/j.softx.2015.06.001
de Jong, D. H. et al. Improved parameters for the martini coarse-grained protein force field. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 9, 687–697 (2013).
pubmed: 26589065 doi: 10.1021/ct300646g
Marrink, S. J., Risselada, H. J., Yefimov, S., Tieleman, D. P. & de Vries, A. H. The MARTINI force field: coarse grained model for biomolecular simulations. J. Phys. Chem. B 111, 7812–7824 (2007).
pubmed: 17569554 doi: 10.1021/jp071097f
Yesylevskyy, S. O., Schäfer, L. V., Sengupta, D. & Marrink, S. J. Polarizable water model for the coarse-grained MARTINI force field. PLoS Comput. Biol. 6, e1000810 (2010).
pubmed: 20548957 pmcid: 2883601 doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000810
Pluhackova, K., Wassenaar, T. A., Kirsch, S. & Böckmann, R. A. Spontaneous adsorption of coiled-coil model peptides K and E to a mixed lipid bilayer. J. Phys. Chem. B 119, 4396–4408 (2015).
pubmed: 25719673 doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.5b00434
Huang, J. et al. CHARMM36m: an improved force field for folded and intrinsically disordered proteins. Nat. Methods 14, 71–73 (2017).
pubmed: 27819658 doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4067
Klauda, J. B. et al. Update of the CHARMM all-atom additive force field for lipids: validation on six lipid types. J. Phys. Chem. B 114, 7830–7843 (2010).
pubmed: 20496934 pmcid: 2922408 doi: 10.1021/jp101759q
Jorgensen, W. L. & Madura, J. D. Temperature and size dependence for Monte Carlo simulations of TIP4P water. Mol. Phys. 56, 1381–1392 (1985).
doi: 10.1080/00268978500103111
Pluhackova, K. et al. A critical comparison of biomembrane force fields: structure and dynamics of model DMPC, POPC, and POPE bilayers. J. Phys. Chem. B 120, 3888–3903 (2016).
pubmed: 27035634 doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.6b01870
Sandoval-Perez, A., Pluhackova, K. & Böckmann, R. A. Critical comparison of biomembrane force fields: protein–lipid interactions at the membrane interface. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 13, 2310–2321 (2017).
pubmed: 28388089 doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.7b00001
de Jong, D. H., Baoukina, S., Ingólfsson, H. I. & Marrink, S. J. Martini straight: boosting performance using a shorter cutoff and GPUs. Comput. Phys. Commun. 199, 1–7 (2016).
doi: 10.1016/j.cpc.2015.09.014
Schrödinger, L. L. C. The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, Version~1.8 (2015).

Auteurs

Pawel R Laskowski (PR)

Department of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich, 4058, Basel, Switzerland.

Kristyna Pluhackova (K)

Department of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich, 4058, Basel, Switzerland.

Maximilian Haase (M)

Molecular Microbiology, Biology Institute, Universität Hohenheim, 70599, Stuttgart, Germany.

Brian M Lang (BM)

Department of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich, 4058, Basel, Switzerland.

Gisela Nagler (G)

Molecular Microbiology, Biology Institute, Universität Hohenheim, 70599, Stuttgart, Germany.

Andreas Kuhn (A)

Molecular Microbiology, Biology Institute, Universität Hohenheim, 70599, Stuttgart, Germany.

Daniel J Müller (DJ)

Department of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich, 4058, Basel, Switzerland. daniel.mueller@bsse.ethz.ch.

Articles similaires

Selecting optimal software code descriptors-The case of Java.

Yegor Bugayenko, Zamira Kholmatova, Artem Kruglov et al.
1.00
Software Algorithms Programming Languages
Photosynthesis Ribulose-Bisphosphate Carboxylase Carbon Dioxide Molecular Dynamics Simulation Cyanobacteria
T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory Lung Neoplasms Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras) Animals Humans

Pathogenic mitochondrial DNA mutations inhibit melanoma metastasis.

Spencer D Shelton, Sara House, Luiza Martins Nascentes Melo et al.
1.00
DNA, Mitochondrial Humans Melanoma Mutation Neoplasm Metastasis

Classifications MeSH