Effect of empagliflozin in patients with heart failure across the spectrum of left ventricular ejection fraction.
Ejection fraction
Empagliflozin
Hospitalization
Sex
Heart failure
Journal
European heart journal
ISSN: 1522-9645
Titre abrégé: Eur Heart J
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8006263
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 Feb 2022
03 Feb 2022
Historique:
received:
18
08
2021
revised:
23
09
2021
accepted:
23
11
2021
pubmed:
9
12
2021
medline:
1
4
2022
entrez:
8
12
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
No therapy has shown to reduce the risk of hospitalization for heart failure across the entire range of ejection fractions seen in clinical practice. We assessed the influence of ejection fraction on the effect of the sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor empagliflozin on heart failure outcomes. A pooled analysis was performed on both the EMPEROR-Reduced and EMPEROR-Preserved trials (9718 patients; 4860 empagliflozin and 4858 placebo), and patients were grouped based on ejection fraction: <25% (n = 999), 25-34% (n = 2230), 35-44% (n = 1272), 45-54% (n = 2260), 55-64% (n = 2092), and ≥65% (n = 865). Outcomes assessed included (i) time to first hospitalization for heart failure or cardiovascular mortality, (ii) time to first heart failure hospitalization, (iii) total (first and recurrent) hospitalizations for heart failure, and (iv) health status assessed by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ). The risk of cardiovascular death and hospitalization for heart failure declined progressively as ejection fraction increased from <25% to ≥65%. Empagliflozin reduced the risk of cardiovascular death or heart failure hospitalization, mainly by reducing heart failure hospitalizations. Empagliflozin reduced the risk of heart failure hospitalization by ≈30% in all ejection fraction subgroups, with an attenuated effect in patients with an ejection fraction ≥65%. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals were: ejection fraction <25%: 0.73 (0.55-0.96); ejection fraction 25-34%: 0.63 (0.50-0.78); ejection fraction 35-44%: 0.72 (0.52-0.98); ejection fraction 45-54%: 0.66 (0.50-0.86); ejection fraction 55-64%: 0.70 (0.53-0.92); and ejection fraction ≥65%: 1.05 (0.70-1.58). Other heart failure outcomes and measures, including KCCQ, showed a similar response pattern. Sex did not influence the responses to empagliflozin. The magnitude of the effect of empagliflozin on heart failure outcomes was clinically meaningful and similar in patients with ejection fractions <25% to <65%, but was attenuated in patients with an ejection fraction ≥65%. How does ejection fraction influence the effects of empagliflozin in patients with heart failure and either a reduced or a preserved ejection fraction? The magnitude of the effect of empagliflozin on heart failure outcomes and health status was similar in patients with ejection fractions <25% to <65%, but it was attenuated in patients with an ejection fraction ≥65%. The consistency of the response in patients with ejection fractions of <25% to <65% distinguishes the effects of empagliflozin from other drugs that have been evaluated across the full spectrum of ejection fractions in patients with heart failure.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34878502
pii: 6455932
doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab798
pmc: PMC8825259
doi:
Substances chimiques
Benzhydryl Compounds
0
Glucosides
0
empagliflozin
HDC1R2M35U
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
416-426Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.
Références
Eur J Heart Fail. 2019 Oct;21(10):1279-1287
pubmed: 31523904
N Engl J Med. 2014 Apr 10;370(15):1383-92
pubmed: 24716680
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Jun 29;77(25):3217-3225
pubmed: 34167646
N Engl J Med. 2019 Oct 24;381(17):1609-1620
pubmed: 31475794
JAMA. 2019 Nov 12;322(18):1761-1762
pubmed: 31517955
Eur J Heart Fail. 2020 May;22(5):898-901
pubmed: 32115864
Eur Heart J. 2021 Mar 31;42(13):1203-1212
pubmed: 33420498
Circulation. 2021 Oct 19;144(16):1284-1294
pubmed: 34459213
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002 Oct 16;40(8):1414-21
pubmed: 12392830
JACC Heart Fail. 2019 Mar;7(3):228-238
pubmed: 30819379
N Engl J Med. 2019 Nov 21;381(21):1995-2008
pubmed: 31535829
Circulation. 2020 Feb 4;141(5):338-351
pubmed: 31736337
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 29;15(4):e0232280
pubmed: 32349122
Eur J Heart Fail. 2018 Aug;20(8):1230-1239
pubmed: 29431256
Circulation. 2021 Oct 12;144(15):1193-1195
pubmed: 34459212
J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Mar 30;6(4):
pubmed: 28360225
N Engl J Med. 2020 Oct 8;383(15):1413-1424
pubmed: 32865377
Eur Heart J. 2016 Feb 1;37(5):455-62
pubmed: 26374849
N Engl J Med. 1999 Sep 2;341(10):709-17
pubmed: 10471456
Circulation. 2020 Feb 4;141(5):352-361
pubmed: 31736342
JAMA Cardiol. 2021 Feb 1;6(2):148-158
pubmed: 33031522
N Engl J Med. 2021 Jan 14;384(2):117-128
pubmed: 33200892
N Engl J Med. 2021 Oct 14;385(16):1451-1461
pubmed: 34449189
N Engl J Med. 2021 Jan 14;384(2):129-139
pubmed: 33200891
N Engl J Med. 2014 Sep 11;371(11):993-1004
pubmed: 25176015
Eur J Heart Fail. 2019 Oct;21(10):1270-1278
pubmed: 31584231
Eur Heart J. 2020 Mar 21;41(12):1249-1257
pubmed: 31386109
Lancet. 2003 Sep 6;362(9386):777-81
pubmed: 13678871