Intracortical Somatosensory Stimulation to Elicit Fingertip Sensations in an Individual With Spinal Cord Injury.
Journal
Neurology
ISSN: 1526-632X
Titre abrégé: Neurology
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0401060
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 Feb 2022
15 Feb 2022
Historique:
received:
24
05
2021
accepted:
19
11
2021
pubmed:
10
12
2021
medline:
6
4
2022
entrez:
9
12
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The restoration of touch to fingers and fingertips is critical to achieving dexterous neuroprosthetic control for individuals with sensorimotor dysfunction. However, localized fingertip sensations have not been evoked via intracortical microstimulation (ICMS). Using a novel intraoperative mapping approach, we implanted electrode arrays in the finger areas of left and right somatosensory cortex and delivered ICMS over a 2-year period in a human participant with spinal cord injury. Stimulation evoked tactile sensations in 8 fingers, including fingertips, spanning both hands. Evoked percepts followed expected somatotopic arrangements. The subject was able to reliably identify up to 7 finger-specific sites spanning both hands in a finger discrimination task. The size of the evoked percepts was on average 33% larger than a finger pad, as assessed via manual markings of a hand image. The size of the evoked percepts increased modestly with increased stimulation intensity, growing 21% as pulse amplitude increased from 20 to 80 µA. Detection thresholds were estimated on a subset of electrodes, with estimates of 9.2 to 35 µA observed, roughly consistent with prior studies. These results suggest that ICMS can enable the delivery of consistent and localized fingertip sensations during object manipulation by neuroprostheses for individuals with somatosensory deficits. NCT03161067.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES
OBJECTIVE
The restoration of touch to fingers and fingertips is critical to achieving dexterous neuroprosthetic control for individuals with sensorimotor dysfunction. However, localized fingertip sensations have not been evoked via intracortical microstimulation (ICMS).
METHODS
METHODS
Using a novel intraoperative mapping approach, we implanted electrode arrays in the finger areas of left and right somatosensory cortex and delivered ICMS over a 2-year period in a human participant with spinal cord injury.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Stimulation evoked tactile sensations in 8 fingers, including fingertips, spanning both hands. Evoked percepts followed expected somatotopic arrangements. The subject was able to reliably identify up to 7 finger-specific sites spanning both hands in a finger discrimination task. The size of the evoked percepts was on average 33% larger than a finger pad, as assessed via manual markings of a hand image. The size of the evoked percepts increased modestly with increased stimulation intensity, growing 21% as pulse amplitude increased from 20 to 80 µA. Detection thresholds were estimated on a subset of electrodes, with estimates of 9.2 to 35 µA observed, roughly consistent with prior studies.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
These results suggest that ICMS can enable the delivery of consistent and localized fingertip sensations during object manipulation by neuroprostheses for individuals with somatosensory deficits.
CLINICALTRIALSGOV IDENTIFIER
BACKGROUND
NCT03161067.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34880087
pii: WNL.0000000000013173
doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000013173
pmc: PMC8865889
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03161067']
Types de publication
Clinical Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e679-e687Subventions
Organisme : NIBIB NIH HHS
ID : T32 EB003383
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© 2021 American Academy of Neurology.
Références
Front Syst Neurosci. 2018 Jun 04;12:24
pubmed: 29915532
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2013 May;21(3):500-7
pubmed: 23475375
Cortex. 2016 Jan;74:1-8
pubmed: 26587914
J Neural Eng. 2014 Oct;11(5):056024
pubmed: 25242377
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Jan 14;117(2):1191-1200
pubmed: 31879342
Exp Brain Res. 1992;89(1):204-13
pubmed: 1601098
J Neural Eng. 2014 Apr;11(2):026004
pubmed: 24503702
Front Hum Neurosci. 2009 Nov 30;3:59
pubmed: 20011220
PLoS One. 2017 May 10;12(5):e0176020
pubmed: 28489913
Front Syst Neurosci. 2015 Apr 10;9:47
pubmed: 25914630
Brain. 1982 Sep;105 (Pt 3):515-42
pubmed: 6286035
J Physiol. 2018 Mar 1;596(5):941-956
pubmed: 29285773
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Dec 8;112(49):15202-7
pubmed: 26504211
Cell. 2020 May 14;181(4):763-773.e12
pubmed: 32330415
J Neural Eng. 2013 Oct;10(5):056013
pubmed: 23985904
Cereb Cortex. 2019 Dec 17;29(11):4613-4627
pubmed: 30668644
Nat Neurosci. 2015 Jan;18(1):138-44
pubmed: 25420067
J Neural Eng. 2021 Mar 04;18(3):
pubmed: 32131064
J Neurosurg. 2021 Mar 26;:1-8
pubmed: 33770760
Science. 2021 May 21;372(6544):831-836
pubmed: 34016775
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Nov 5;110(45):18279-84
pubmed: 24127595
Front Integr Neurosci. 2009 Sep 01;3:20
pubmed: 19750199
Front Neurosci. 2019 Feb 13;12:1030
pubmed: 30814923
Nature. 2011 Oct 05;479(7372):228-31
pubmed: 21976021
J Neurophysiol. 2006 Aug;96(2):512-21
pubmed: 16835359
Neuroimage. 2018 Oct 1;179:337-347
pubmed: 29940282
J Neurophysiol. 1995 Jan;73(1):361-72
pubmed: 7714578
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Oct 22;116(43):21821-21827
pubmed: 31591224
Elife. 2021 Jul 27;10:
pubmed: 34313221
N Engl J Med. 2016 Nov 24;375(21):2060-2066
pubmed: 27959736
Elife. 2018 Apr 10;7:
pubmed: 29633714
J Clin Neurosci. 2019 May;63:116-121
pubmed: 30711286
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2008 Feb;16(1):32-6
pubmed: 18303803
Percept Psychophys. 2001 Nov;63(8):1279-92
pubmed: 11800457
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009 May;10(5):345-59
pubmed: 19352402
Sci Transl Med. 2016 Oct 19;8(361):361ra141
pubmed: 27738096