Comparison of National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Surgical Risk Calculator, Trauma and Injury Severity Score, and American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status to predict operative trauma mortality in elderly patients.
Journal
The journal of trauma and acute care surgery
ISSN: 2163-0763
Titre abrégé: J Trauma Acute Care Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101570622
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 03 2022
01 03 2022
Historique:
pubmed:
10
12
2021
medline:
8
3
2022
entrez:
9
12
2021
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) uses anatomical and physiologic variables to predict mortality. Elderly (65 years or older) trauma patients have increased mortality and morbidity for a given TRISS, in part because of functional status and comorbidities. These factors are incorporated into the American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA-PS) and National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Surgical Risk Calculator (NSQIP-SRC). We hypothesized scoring tools using comorbidities and functional status to be superior at predicting mortality, hospital length of stay (LOS), and complications in elderly trauma patients undergoing operation. Four level I trauma centers prospectively collected data on elderly trauma patients undergoing surgery within 24 hours of admission. Using logistic regression, five scoring models were compared: ASA-PS, NSQIP-SRC, TRISS, TRISS-ASA-PS, and TRISS-NSQIP-SRC.Brier scores and area under the receiver operator characteristics curve were calculated to compare mortality prediction. Adjusted R2 and root mean squared error were used to compare LOS and predictive ability for number of complications. From 122 subjects, 9 (7.4%) died, and the average LOS was 12.9 days (range, 1-110 days). National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Surgical Risk Calculator was superior to ASA-PS and TRISS at predicting mortality (area under the receiver operator characteristics curve, 0.978 vs. 0.768 vs. 0.903; p = 0.007). Furthermore, NSQIP-SRC was more accurate predicting LOS (R2, 25.9% vs. 13.3% vs. 20.5%) and complications (R2, 34.0% vs. 22.6% vs. 29.4%) compared with TRISS and ASA-PS. Adding TRISS to NSQIP-SRC improved predictive ability compared with NSQIP-SRC alone for complications (R2, 35.5% vs. 34.0%; p = 0.046). However, adding ASA-PS or TRISS to NSQIP-SRC did not improve the predictive ability for mortality or LOS. The NSQIP-SRC, which includes comorbidities and functional status, had superior ability to predict mortality, LOS, and complications compared with TRISS alone in elderly trauma patients undergoing surgery. Prognostic and Epidemiologic; Level III.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) uses anatomical and physiologic variables to predict mortality. Elderly (65 years or older) trauma patients have increased mortality and morbidity for a given TRISS, in part because of functional status and comorbidities. These factors are incorporated into the American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA-PS) and National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Surgical Risk Calculator (NSQIP-SRC). We hypothesized scoring tools using comorbidities and functional status to be superior at predicting mortality, hospital length of stay (LOS), and complications in elderly trauma patients undergoing operation.
METHODS
Four level I trauma centers prospectively collected data on elderly trauma patients undergoing surgery within 24 hours of admission. Using logistic regression, five scoring models were compared: ASA-PS, NSQIP-SRC, TRISS, TRISS-ASA-PS, and TRISS-NSQIP-SRC.Brier scores and area under the receiver operator characteristics curve were calculated to compare mortality prediction. Adjusted R2 and root mean squared error were used to compare LOS and predictive ability for number of complications.
RESULTS
From 122 subjects, 9 (7.4%) died, and the average LOS was 12.9 days (range, 1-110 days). National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Surgical Risk Calculator was superior to ASA-PS and TRISS at predicting mortality (area under the receiver operator characteristics curve, 0.978 vs. 0.768 vs. 0.903; p = 0.007). Furthermore, NSQIP-SRC was more accurate predicting LOS (R2, 25.9% vs. 13.3% vs. 20.5%) and complications (R2, 34.0% vs. 22.6% vs. 29.4%) compared with TRISS and ASA-PS. Adding TRISS to NSQIP-SRC improved predictive ability compared with NSQIP-SRC alone for complications (R2, 35.5% vs. 34.0%; p = 0.046). However, adding ASA-PS or TRISS to NSQIP-SRC did not improve the predictive ability for mortality or LOS.
CONCLUSION
The NSQIP-SRC, which includes comorbidities and functional status, had superior ability to predict mortality, LOS, and complications compared with TRISS alone in elderly trauma patients undergoing surgery.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE
Prognostic and Epidemiologic; Level III.
Identifiants
pubmed: 34882598
doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003481
pii: 01586154-202203000-00002
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
481-488Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2021 American Association for the Surgery of Trauma.
Références
Vespa J, Armstrong D, Medina L. Demographic turning points for the United States: population projections for 2020 to 2060. Curr Popul Rep . 2018:25–1144.
Halaweish I, Alam HB. Changing demographics of the American population. Surg Clin North Am . 2015;95(1):1–10.
Jiang L, Zheng Z, Zhang M. The incidence of geriatric trauma is increasing and comparison of different scoring tools for the prediction of in-hospital mortality in geriatric trauma patients. World J Emerg Surg . 2020;15(1):59.
Perdue PW, Watts DD, Kaufmann CR, Trask AL. Differences in mortality between elderly and younger adult trauma patients: geriatric status increases risk of delayed death. J Trauma . 1998;45(4):805–810.
Ross SW, Adeyemi FM, Zhou M, Minhajuddin AT, Porembka MR, Cripps MW, Phelan HA. One-year mortality in geriatric trauma patients: improving upon the geriatric trauma outcomes score utilizing the social security death index. J Trauma Acute Care Surg . 2019;87(5):1148–1155.
Adams SD, Holcomb JB. Geriatric trauma. Curr Opin Crit Care . 2015;21(6):520–526.
Evans DC, Gerlach AT, Christy JM, Jarvis AM, Lindsey DE, Whitmill ML, Eiferman D, Murphy CV, Cook CH, Beery PR 2nd, et al. Pre-injury polypharmacy as a predictor of outcomes in trauma patients. Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci . 2011;1(2):104–109.
Kozar RA, Arbabi S, Stein DM, Shackford SR, Barraco RD, Biffl WL, Brasel KJ, Cooper Z, Fakhry SM, Livingston D, et al. Injury in the aged. J Trauma Acute Care Surg . 2015;78(6):1197–1209.
Chawda MN, Hildebrand F, Pape HC, Giannoudis PV. Predicting outcome after multiple trauma: which scoring system? Injury . 2004;35(4):347–358.
Baker SP, O’Neill B, Haddon W Jr., Long WB. The injury severity score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care. J Trauma . 1974;14(3):187–196.
Boyd CR, Tolson MA, Copes WS. Evaluating trauma care: the TRISS method. Trauma Score and the Injury Severity Score. J Trauma . 1987;27(4):370–378.
Stewart N, MacConchie JG, Castillo R, Thomas PG, Cipolla J, Stawicki SP. Beyond mortality: does trauma-related injury severity score predict complications or lengths of stay using a large administrative dataset. J Emerg Trauma Shock . 2021;14(3):143–147.
Tohira H, Jacobs I, Mountain D, Gibson N, Yeo A. Systematic review of predictive performance of injury severity scoring tools. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med . 2012;20:63.
Gabbe BJ, Cameron PA, Wolfe R. TRISS: does it get better than this? Acad Emerg Med . 2004;11(2):181–186.
Moore L, Lavoie A, Turgeon AF, Abdous B, Le Sage N, Émond M, Liberman M, Bergeron É. Improving trauma mortality prediction modeling for blunt trauma. J Trauma . 2010;68(3):698–705.
Rogers FB, Osler T, Krasne M, Rogers A, Bradburn EH, Lee JC, Wu D, McWilliams N, Horst MA. Has TRISS become an anachronism? A comparison of mortality between the National Trauma Data Bank and Major Trauma Outcome Study databases. J Trauma Acute Care Surg . 2012;73(2):326–331; discussion 31.
Morris JA Jr. The effect of preexisting conditions on mortality in trauma patients. JAMA . 1990;263(14):1942–1946.
Mayhew D, Mendonca V, Murthy BVS. A review of ASA physical status – historical perspectives and modern developments. Anaesthesia . 2019;74:373–379.
Ringdal KG, Skaga NO, Steen PA, Hestnes M, Laake P, Jones JM, Lossius HM. Classification of comorbidity in trauma: the reliability of pre-injury ASA physical status classification. Injury . 2013;44(1):29–35.
Skaga NO, Eken T, Søvik S, Jones JM, Steen PA. Pre-injury ASA physical status classification is an independent predictor of mortality after trauma. J Trauma . 2007;63(5):972–978.
ACS NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator. 2021. Available at: https://riskcalculator.facs.org/RiskCalculator/PatientInfo.jsp . Accessed September 6, 2021.
von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Ann Intern Med . 2007;147(8):573–577.
Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform . 2009;42(2):377–381.
Morris RS, Milia D, Glover J, Napolitano LM, Chen B, Lindemann E, Hemmila MR, Stein D, Kummerfeld E, Chipman J, et al. Predictors of elderly mortality after trauma: a novel outcome score. J Trauma Acute Care Surg . 2020;88(3):416–424.
Zhao FZ, Wolf SE, Nakonezny PA, Minhajuddin A, Rhodes RL, Paulk ME, Phelan HA. Estimating geriatric mortality after injury using age, injury severity, and performance of a transfusion: the geriatric trauma outcome score. J Palliat Med . 2015;18(8):677–681.
Joseph B, Pandit V, Zangbar B, Kulvatunyou N, Hashmi A, Green DJ, O’Keeffe T, Tang A, Vercruysse G, Fain MJ, et al. Superiority of frailty over age in predicting outcomes among geriatric trauma patients. JAMA Surg . 2014;149(8):766–772.
Rogers FB, Osler TM, Shackford SR, Morrow PL, Sartorelli KH, Camp L, Healey MA, Martin F. A population-based study of geriatric trauma in a rural state. J Trauma . 2001;50(4):604–609.
Milzman DP, Boulanger BR, Rodriguez A, Soderstrom CA, Mitchell KA, Magnant CM. Pre-existing disease in trauma patients: a predictor of fate independent of age and injury severity score. J Trauma . 1992;32(2):236–243; discussion 243-4.
Bergeron E, Rossignol M, Osler T, Clas D, Lavoie A. Improving the TRISS methodology by restructuring age categories and adding comorbidities. J Trauma . 2004;56(4):760–767.
Koo CY, Hyder JA, Wanderer JP, Eikermann M, Ramachandran SK. A meta-analysis of the predictive accuracy of postoperative mortality using the American Society of Anesthesiologists' physical status classification system. World J Surg . 2015;39(1):88–103.
Kuza CM, Matsushima K, Mack WJ, Pham C, Hourany T, Lee J, Tran TD, Dudaryk R, Mulder MB, Escanelle MA, et al. The role of the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification in predicting trauma mortality and outcomes. Am J Surg . 2019;218(6):1143–1151.
Hackett NJ, De Oliveira GS, Jain UK, Kim JY. ASA class is a reliable independent predictor of medical complications and mortality following surgery. Int J Surg . 2015;18:184–190.
Stocker B, Weiss HK, Weingarten N, Engelhardt K, Engoren M, Posluszny J. Predicting length of stay for trauma and emergency general surgery patients. Am J Surg . 2020;220(3):757–764.
Golden DL, Ata A, Kusupati V, Jenkel T, Khakoo NS, Taguma K, Siddiqui R, Chan R, Rivetz J, Rosati C. Predicting postoperative complications after acute care surgery: how accurate is the ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator? Am Surg . 2019;85(4):335–341.
Lang PO, Heitz D, Hédelin G, Dramé M, Jovenin N, Ankri J, Somme D, Novella JL, Gauvain JB, Couturier P, et al. Early markers of prolonged hospital stays in older people: a prospective, multicenter study of 908 inpatients in French acute hospitals. J Am Geriatr Soc . 2006;54(7):1031–1039.
Deluzio MR, Keshava HB, Wang Z, Boffa DJ, Detterbeck FC, Kim AW. A model for predicting prolonged length of stay in patients undergoing anatomical lung resection: a National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database study. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg . 2016;23(2):208–215.
Dimaggio C, Ayoung-Chee P, Shinseki M, Wilson C, Marshall G, Lee DC, Wall S, Maulana S, Leon Pachter H, Frangos S. Traumatic injury in the United States: in-patient epidemiology 2000–2011. Injury . 2016;47(7):1393–1403.
Choi M, Kang CM, Chong JU, Hwang HK, Yoon DS, Lee WJ. Rates of serious complications estimated by the ACS-NSQIP surgical risk calculator in predicting oncologic outcomes of patients treated with pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic head cancer. J Gastrointest Surg . 2019;23(6):1180–1187.
Vaziri S, Wilson J, Abbatematteo J, Kubilis P, Chakraborty S, Kshitij K, Hoh DJ. Predictive performance of the American College of Surgeons universal risk calculator in neurosurgical patients. J Neurosurg . 2018;128(3):942–947.
Wingert NC, Gotoff J, Parrilla E, Gotoff R, Hou L, Ghanem E. The ACS NSQIP risk calculator is a fair predictor of acute periprosthetic joint infection. Clin Orthop Relat Res . 2016;474(7):1643–1648.
Keller DS, Ho JW, Mercadel AJ, Ogola GO, Steele SR. Are we taking a risk with risk assessment tools? Evaluating the relationship between NSQIP and the ACS risk calculator in colorectal surgery. Am J Surg . 2018;216(4):645–651.
Kuza CM, Hatzakis G, Nahmias JT. The assignment of American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status classification for adult polytrauma patients: results from a survey and future considerations. Anesth Analg . 2017;125(6):1960–1966.
Bilimoria KY, Liu Y, Paruch JL, Zhou L, Kmiecik TE, Ko CY, Cohen ME. Development and evaluation of the universal ACS NSQIP surgical risk calculator: a decision aid and informed consent tool for patients and surgeons. J Am Coll Surg . 2013;217(5):833–42.e1-3.
Bertsimas D, Dunn J, Velmahos GC, Kaafarani HMA. Surgical risk is not linear: derivation and validation of a novel, user-friendly, and machine-learning-based Predictive OpTimal Trees in Emergency Surgery Risk (POTTER) calculator. Ann Surg . 2018;268(4):574–583.
Maurer LR, Bertsimas D, Bouardi HT, El Hechi M, El Moheb M, Giannoutsou K, Zhuo D, Dunn J, Velmahos GC, Kaafarani HMA. Trauma outcome predictor: an artificial intelligence interactive smartphone tool to predict outcomes in trauma patients. J Trauma Acute Care Surg . 2021;91(1):93–99.